Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.11.0

+1 (binding) Checked points: 1. Download links are fine 2. Checksum and signature are all fine 3. Contains LICENSE and NOTICE, it is fine On Sat, Oct 5, 2024 at 10:48 AM JunXu Chen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - Download links are valid > - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.10.0

+1 binding: Checked points: 1. download links are fine 2. Checksum and signature are fine 3. Included LICENSE AND NOTICE file 4. No binary source file On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:46 PM Ming Wen wrote: > +1 binding > > I checked: > 1. All links are correct > 2. Checksum and signature are correct >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.10.0

hi Abhishek Choudhary: -1 @Abhishek, I got this error when I tried to verify the gpg signature ··· $ gpg --verify apache-apisix-3.10.0-src.tgz.asc apache-apisix-3.10.0-src.tgz gpg: Signature made Mon 05 Aug 2024 01:22:19 PM CST gpg:using RSA key DC989D80930A699B64F4C5BC4D3AB184B6

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to remove the default configuration file

+1 Looks good to me This is much better regards. On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:55 PM Madhawa Kasun Gunasekara < madh...@apache.org> wrote: > How will users register custom plugins with this change? More information > on plugin development can be found here: > https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/

CVE-2024-32638: Apache APISIX: Forward-Auth Request Smuggling

Severity: low Affected versions: - Apache APISIX 3.8.0, 3.9.0 Description: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX when using `forward-auth` plugin. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.8.0, 3.9.0 . Users are recommended to up

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache APISIX 3.8.1

Hi, community: Release vote for Apache APISIX 3.8.1 has PASSED and closed now. 4 PMC +1 votes: - YuanSheng Wang - JunXu Chen - Peter Zhu - Zeping Bai Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/dddm5nt358hx34fw0xts6869bdop1vlt I will continue the release process. Thank you all for making

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache APISIX 3.9.1

Hi, community: Release vote for Apache APISIX 3.9.1 has PASSED and closed now. 3 PMC +1 votes: - YuanSheng Wang - Peter Zhu - Zeping Bai Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/6w846jnnk75skq9mdyz6zwnwgnr6z2cp I will continue the release process. Thank you all for making this happen

Re: [VOTE]Apache apisix-ingress-controller release version 1.8.2

hi: After discussing, Just use Linux next time, it is acceptable. regards. On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:48 AM YuanSheng Wang wrote: > Hi Ashish: > > I think we should regenerate > `apache-apisix-ingress-controller-1.8.2-src.tgz` again. > > I got many warning message when do `

Re: [VOTE]Apache apisix-ingress-controller release version 1.8.2

hi: +1 binding I checked： 1. Download links are OK. 2. Checksum and signature are OK. 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist. On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:48 AM YuanSheng Wang wrote: > Hi Ashish: > > I think we should regenerate > `apache-apisix-ingress-controller-1.8.2-src.tgz` agai

Re: [VOTE]Apache apisix-ingress-controller release version 1.8.2

Hi Ashish: I think we should regenerate `apache-apisix-ingress-controller-1.8.2-src.tgz` again. I got many warning message when do `unzip`, it make me confused about if it is a correct package. ``` tar -xvf apache-apisix-ingress-controller-1.8.2-src.tgz ... tar: Ignoring unknown extended header

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.8.1

hi: +1 (binding) I checked: 1. All download links are fine 2. Signature correct 3. LICENSE and NOTICE are fine 4. No binary file On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:06 PM Xin Rong wrote: > There is some problem with the installation steps listed in the > documentation linked in the original email. > P

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.9.1

hi: +1 binding I checked: 1. All download links are fine 2. Signature correct 3. LICENSE and NOTICE are fine 4. No binary file On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:36 PM Xin Rong wrote: > There is some problem with the installation steps listed in the > documentation linked in the original email. > Ple

Re: How do I setup high availability Apache APISIX clusters?

hi omer: https://github.com/apache/apisix/raw/master/docs/assets/images/apisix.png This is the best practice. it is easy to find it: https://github.com/apache/apisix?tab=readme-ov-file#apache-apisix-api-gateway regards. On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 9:32 PM Abhishek Choudhary < shreemaan.abhis...@g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.7.0

hi: +1 (binding) I checked: * download links are fine * checksum is fine * no binary file regards. On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 7:13 PM Xin Rong wrote: > Hello, Community, > > This is a call for the vote to release Apache APISIX version > > Release notes: > > https://github.com/apache/apisix/

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: APISIX: refactoring the admin API: make service the first-class resource

hi: This is a very big change for APISIX users. With the increasing number of APISIX users and the integration with the surrounding ecosystem, using service as the main object is more in line with the modern API gateway design. I prefer this new design. On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:17 PM Jinhua L

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.3.0

+1 binding I checked the change log LI Fabrice 于2023年4月27日 周四19:09写道： > +1 (non-binding) > > I checked： > 1. All links are correct except Release notes link. >1. https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/release/3.3/CHANGELOG.md#330 > has no 3.3 changelog > 2. Checksum and signature are correct

Re: Change: optimize the Consul discovery plugin to obtain precise service node info from Consul cluster

hi: I am not familiar with consul, but it seems that we should use ` /catalog/services`. ANSWER 1: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44240633/single-api-to-list-all-the-services-consul-cluster I advise to submit a question to the `consul` project: https://github.com/hashicorp/consul I think t

Re: [VOTE]Apache apisix-ingress-controller release version 1.6.0

+1 from my vote Check list: 1. All links are fine 2. Contains LICENSE and NOTICE 3. No unexpected binary 4. signature and checksum are fine On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 1:53 PM Zhiyuan Ju wrote: > Hi, > > +1 from me, I have checked: > > 1. All links are valid; > 2. Build successfully on M1 > 3. LIC

Re: [VOTE]Apache apisix-ingress-controller release version 1.6.0-rc1

+1 binding I checked: 1. all download links are fine; 2. checksum are correct 3. NOTICE and LICENSE files exist regards. On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 2:37 PM Chao Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding from me. > > I have checked: > > 1. All links are valid > 2. Signature and checksum are correct > 3.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.0.0

+1 binding On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:45 PM YuanSheng Wang wrote: > vote +1 > > I checked: > > 1. download links are fine > 2. checksum is fine > 3. succ to unzip source file > 4. succ to build APISIX from source > 5. run it successfully on Debain 11. > 6. Licens

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 3.0.0

vote +1 I checked: 1. download links are fine 2. checksum is fine 3. succ to unzip source file 4. succ to build APISIX from source 5. run it successfully on Debain 11. 6. License and Notice file are fine 7. no binary file On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:17 AM tzssangglass wrote: > Hello, Communit

Re: Proposal: Making APISIX intelligent

It is a nice feature, if we can do `QPS performance should exceed3.0.0-beta version by 30%`, it is cool. On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:46 PM tzssangglass wrote: > Background > In the early days, APISIX prided itself on its high performance, but as the > project grew, we would add more features to t

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Supporting interacting with etcd via gRPC

hi: Love this new feature, Nginx has been relatively lacking in gRPC support, and I am looking forward to this feature. On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 10:42 AM Jintao Zhang wrote: > SGTM! > > The processing of the entire request chain will be shorter. > And we don't need to be limited by grpc_gateway

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Consumer group

it is a nice new feature. Can't wait to try it. On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 10:57 AM Zhiyuan Ju wrote: > Hi, > > The description is clear to me, and the API design looks good! > > > Jinhua Luo 于2022年9月2日周五 11:45写道： > > > Background: > > > > With consumer groups, you can define any number of plugi

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Open source lua-resty-nonblocking-ffi

Jinhua: Why are you using ANNOUNCE directly? It is not the thing that is discussed and agreed upon in the community. This will confuse many folks in the community. You cannot announce results on behalf of the Apache APISIX community. If you want to do something, we should discuss it first. Then

Re: [DISCUSS]Do we need to create a new subproject of the Apache APISIX for profiling

I will vote it too. ^_^ On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 10:40 AM Zexuan Luo wrote: > > Do we need to create a new subproject of the Apache APISIX for profiling > > Yes, I will vote for it. I am looking forward to such a project! > > hui li 于2022年7月21日周四 15:51写道： > > > > The current Apache APISIX Prof

Re: [DISCUSS] A New Apache APISIX sub-project - A Profile Toolkit For Apache APISIX

to @SHeng "-1 binding The whole topic is actually not a thing determined by the community or the PMC." You are right, I agree with you. so I think we do not need to discuss this topic anymore, all right? It is meaningless. The next step, I think we should move to a new topic: "do we need to cre

Re: [DISCUSS] A New Apache APISIX sub-project - A Profile Toolkit For Apache APISIX

I think we have got a result. @yousa, if you're ready, you can submit a "Create an Apache subproject for .." vote. On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:53 PM Sheng Wu wrote: > -1 binding > > The whole topic is actually not a thing determined by the community or the > PMC. > This is wrong from an owner

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.13.2

+1 binding 1. download links are valid 2. Checksum and signature are valid On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:23 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > +1 (binding) I have checked: > > 1. All the links in the mail are correct; > 2. Checksum and signature are valid; > 3. The tar package can be unpacked successfully; >

Re: apache/apisix-go-plugin-runner项目受到 2 个存在安全缺陷开源组件的影响

cool job many thx Chever John and shirui On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 5:43 PM shirui zhao wrote: > It's fixed, thanks again for your feedback. > > — > Shirui Zhao > > > 2022年6月21日 21:33，shirui zhao 写道： > > > > Thanks for your feedback, I'll check it out. > > > > > >> 2022年6月21日 21:28，Chever John 写

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Go Plugin Runner 0.4.0

+1 binding Checked options: 1. download links are valid 2. Signature and checksum are valid On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 8:32 PM tzssangglass wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I have checked: > 1. All download links are OK; > 2. Signature and checksum are valid; > 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist and are

Re: [New video tutorial] APIs security with Apache APISIX

hi Bobur: You are so cute in the video. nice On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:04 PM Bobur Umurzokov wrote: > Hi, Everyone > > 👉I am happy to share with you another video tutorial about APIs security > with Apache APISIX * (* > https://youtu.be/hMFjhwLMtQ8 *) * publish

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new PMC: ZhengSong Tu

Congratulations! On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:51 AM Zeping Bai wrote: > Congratulations! > > > Thanks! > Zeping Bai @bzp2010 > > Ming Wen 于2022年6月6日周一 10:44写道： > > > Hello, community, > > The Project Management Committee(PMC) of Apache APISIX has voted passed > and > > invited ZhengSong Tu to be

Re: [DISCUSS] APISIX 3.0: DP and CP are deployed independently

hi: The APISIX user is easier to know how to deploy APISIX the right way. One more point: we'll implement it in APISIX 3.0, all LGTM. ^_^ On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 3:07 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > 1. Background > > 1.1 Problem to be solved > > For APISIX 1.* and 2.* versions, the DP (DataPlane) plan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Dashboard 2.13.0 Round 2

+1 binding I checked: * download links are fine * checksum is fine * NOTICE and LICENSE files are fine * no any binary file On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 12:18 PM Zhihuang Lin wrote: > +1 non-binding > > I checked: > > 1. All links are valid > 2. Signature is correct > 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files ex

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.14.1 Round 2

+1 binding I have checked: 1. All links are fine. 2. Checksum and signature are fine. 3. Include LICENSE and NOTICE files. On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 4:08 PM Wei Jiang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 1.All links are valid. > 2.Checksum & signature are valid. > 3.Building and Running successfully (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.14.1 Round 2

+1 binding Checked list: 1. all download links are fine; 2. checksum and signature are fine; 3. NOTICE and License file are fine; 4. Version is correct; 5. Unpacked successfully; On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 10:44 PM Jintao Zhang wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I have checked: > > 1. all links are corre

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.14.0

+1 binding Checked list: 1. All links are fine 2. Signature and checksum are fine 3. NOTICE and LICENSE files exist On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 11:24 AM shirui zhao wrote: > +1 non-binding > > I have checked: > 1. All links are OK > 2. Signature and checksum are correct > 3. NOTICE and LICENSE fi

Re: [VOTE]Apache apisix-ingress-controller patch version 1.4.1

+1 (binding) I checked: - Download links are valid - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid - The LICENSE and NOTICE files are good On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:33 PM Jintao Zhang wrote: > Hello, Community, > This is a call for the vote to release Apache APISIX Ingress controller > version 1.4.1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.13.1

+1 (binding) Checked list: 1. Download links are valid. 2. Checksum and signature are OK. 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist. On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:06 PM shirui zhao wrote: > +1 ( no opinion) > > I checked： > 1. Download links are OK. > 2. Checksum and signature are OK. > 3. LICENSE and NO

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Go Plugin Runner 0.3.0

+1 binding I checked: 1. download links are fine 2. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist 3. Signatures are fine On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 10:09 AM Qi Guo wrote: > +1 non-binding > > I have checked: > 1. All links are OK > 2. Checksum and signature are OK > 3. LICENSE and NOTICE files exist > > Baoyuan

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache APISIX plugin of serverless supports running in sanbox

It is very necessary to run dynamic Lua script code in a sandbox. Only then there is no chance for the user's serverless code to break the Lua runtime. Once this malicious code modifies Lua's runtime, it has a chance to affect all requests. On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 8:20 PM shirui zhao wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS][Change] Support set redirect server port under http_to_https mode in plugin redirect

I prefer this style, it's easier to read. "plugins": { "redirect": { "uri": "https://$host:9443$request_uri";, "ret_code": 301 } } On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 10:04 PM Kwanhur Huang wrote: > hi, the community > > Issue #4400

Re: Proposal: support external name service

Does the implementation of this feature need to update APISIX? On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 9:34 AM Jintao Zhang wrote: > I have seen some voices in the community, hoping that APISIX Ingress can > proxy external services e.g: [1], [2] > > For these two types of requirements, it is a relatively simpl

Re: [Proposal] Redesign the architecture of the plugin system

I've been thinking about this for a long time, but there's never been a proposal that's simple, feasible, and easier for users to use. On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 5:15 PM Bozhong Yu wrote: > Hi, Nicolas. > > I agree with your proposal that a way should be provided to allow the > plugin to support m

Re: [Proposal] Refactor the plugin code organization

hi folks: This change seems to be only useful for developers, right? On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:54 AM Fei Liang wrote: > deal all: > > > PROPOSAL > > Refactor the plugin code organization, make the plugin independent from > APISIX, and maintain the plugin independently. > > > BACKGROUND > >

Re: [Proposal] reCAPTCHA plugin: restrict access to an upstream service by verifying request captcha token to the Google reCAPTCHA service

On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 1:39 PM YuanSheng Wang wrote: > > { > > "plugins": { > > "recaptcha": { > > "apis":[ > > { > > "path":"/login", >

Re: [Proposal] reCAPTCHA plugin: restrict access to an upstream service by verifying request captcha token to the Google reCAPTCHA service

> { > "plugins": { > "recaptcha": { > "apis":[ > { > "path":"/login", > "methods":[ "POST" ], > "param_from":"header", > "param_name":"captcha" can we use this project? https://g

Re: Getting started with Apache APISIX @YouTube

many thx Bobur! Your job is cool. The content is very clear and helpful. On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 4:15 PM Sylvia wrote: > Thanks, Bobur! > > Have a quick look at this video, it's so cool and helpful. What great work! > > Bobur Umurzokov 于2022年3月3日周四 15:17写道： > > > Hi, > > > > Getting started wi

Re: Public APISIX roadmap

hi: We are preparing a roadmap for APISIX, which is expected to be sent out this week, and then we can discuss it. Please wait for more time. thx On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 4:09 PM ZhengSong Tu wrote: > Cool. If you change checklist to table type, add descriptions, links, > etc. to different t

Re: [DISCSSS] add UI form for plugins (traffic-split，authz-casbin )

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:20 PM Zhiyuan Ju wrote: > Hi, > > It’s hard indeed, but if it’s right to do this? > I can not sure it is the right thing. We need to collect more feedback from open source users. > > YuanSheng Wang 于2022年2月21日 周一22:11写道： > > > On M

Re: [DISCSSS] add UI form for plugins (traffic-split，authz-casbin )

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 5:27 PM Zhiyuan Ju wrote: > Hi, > > Before making UIs for each plugin, we need to know if it's really needed to > do this. You could first collect feedback from open source users, if they > use this plugin, what's the UX they need? > > We have many channels to collect feed

[Notice] Community Weekly Meeting (Feb 16, 2022)

Hi, here is the schedule for the coming Weekly Meeting. Schedule Date: on Wednesday, Feb 16, at 20:00 ~ 22:00 (UTC +8) Meeting Link: https://meeting.tencent.com/dm/VLjTH3CU3QVi Content: Apache APISIX is one of the active API Gateway projects in the world. Since open source on June 6, 2019, it h

Re: when etcd database space exceeded. apisix does not start properly

the read-only way is the right way. this is a draft PR: https://github.com/apache/apisix/pull/6202 zaunist is working on it. After this PR is merged, APISIX does not need to write etcd most of the time. welcome Jie123108 to join this PR, make it faster ^_^ On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 10:15 PM Ming

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove fixed token of admin API in APISIX

hi: We are trying to fix this issue. and we need to confirm one more thing: Do we need to release a new version of APISIX？ Here is the list: 1. master branch 2. `2.12`: the latest version of APISIX 3. `2.10`: the LTS version of APISIX I think it is a security issue. If your answer is YES too, t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new PMC: jintao zhang

Congratulations ^_^ On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:04 PM Bozhong Yu wrote: > Congratulations ! > > Tsangleslie 于2022年1月19日周三 15:52写道： > > > Congratulations ！🥳🥳🥳 > > > > Leslie Tsang > > leslie.ts...@icloud.com > > > > > On 19 Jan 2022, at 9:31 AM, Jintao Zhang > > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new PMC: zeping Bai

Congratulations to Zeping, welcome onboarding. ^_^ On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:30 AM bardolph shampine < bardolphshampine77...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congratulations to bzp2010 > > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, 23:57 tzssangglass wrote: > > > Congratulations to Zeping! > > > > *ZhengSong Tu* > > My GitHub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Dashboard 2.10.1

+1 (binding) I checked: * Download links are fine. * Checksum and signature are fine. * LICENSE and NOTICE files exist * Building on fedora successfully On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:51 PM Bozhong Yu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I checked： > 1. Download links are OK. > 2. Checksum and signature

Re: [Proposal] Drop the support of Tengine

agree +1 the Tengine is not active recently. On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 1:45 PM Bozhong Yu wrote: > Agree, +1 to drop the support of Tengine > > Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年12月21日周二 10:47写道： > > > > In the future, we may only support OpenResty 1.19+. > > > We don't have contributors who are familiar enough

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Bisakh Mondal

@Bisakh Congratulation ^_^ On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 10:10 AM JunXu Chen wrote: > Congratulation! > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 09:43, yeliang wang > wrote: > > > > Congrats! > > > > Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年12月19日周日 10:33写道： > > > > > Hi Community, > > > > > > Our contributor Bisakh Mondal[1] helps our co

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache APISIX Dashboard 2.10.0

many thx okaybase for your cool job ^_^ On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 2:48 PM Zhiyuan Ju wrote: > Thanks for your help! I just moved the package to > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/apisix/dashboard/2.10.0/ > > Best Regards! > @ Zhiyuan Ju > > > okaybase 于2

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal: APISIX support RocketMQ service plugin

bout this case. > > *ZhengSong Tu* > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass > Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix > > YuanSheng Wang 于2021年11月25日周四 上午9:03写道： > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:08 PM Zexuan Luo > wrote: > > > > > The

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal: APISIX support RocketMQ service plugin

ted an issue right now: https://github.com/yuz10/lua-resty-rocketmq/issues/4 he/she is apache member, so I think it is easier to work together. waiting for news. > > YuanSheng Wang 于2021年11月24日周三 下午10:30写道： > > > > Hi: > > > > > just like https://github.com/douj

Re: Release Apache APISIX 2.11.0 Round 2

> 4. Building on macOS 11.6 was successful. my macOS version is 12.0.1. On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:45 PM YuanSheng Wang wrote: > +1 > > I checked： > 1. Download links are OK. > 2. Checksum and signature are OK. > 3. LICENSE and NOTICE have existed. > 4. Building on m

Re: Release Apache APISIX 2.11.0 Round 2

+1 I checked： 1. Download links are OK. 2. Checksum and signature are OK. 3. LICENSE and NOTICE have existed. 4. Building on macOS 11.6 was successful. On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:13 PM ZhengSong Tu wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I checked： > 1. Download links are OK. > 2. Checksum and signature

Re: Here are some feedbacks from our developers

Need an example: how to write my first APISIX plugin How about this title? On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:33 PM Baoyuan wrote: > > I thought developers could use video and docs to share how to set up a > development environment, how to write the first line of code, how to > debug > > I very much ag

Re: [DISCUSS] proposal: APISIX support RocketMQ service plugin

Hi: > just like https://github.com/doujiang24/lua-resty-kafka I suggest to communicate with the rocketmq community and listen to their suggestions. If the rocketmq protocol is more complicated, we can use languages such as Java/Golang to implement a simple version first. On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 a

Re: [DISCUSS] Propose Apache APISIX Community Weekly Meeting

hi: I think the biweekly interval is better (personal guess). And we can discuss some proposals and important issues at this time. ^_^ The current communication is mainly in Chinese, and English communication can be added in the future. On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:13 PM yeliang wang wrote: > Ca

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Shivam Singh

Congratulations ^_^ On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 6:29 PM Shivam Singh wrote: > Thank you team ! > Best regards, > > Shivam Singh > <https://github.com/1502shivam-singh> > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 12:30 PM YuanSheng Wang > wrote: > > > Hi, community, &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Support smart prioritization in route matching

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:16 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > So far, we can match routes with hosts/remote_addrs/vars. How can we > compare two routes, one has vars and the other has hosts? > there is no way for this case. > > YuanSheng Wang 于2021年11月22日周一 下午3:07写道： > > &g

Re: [REMINDER] CFP for FOSS Backstage closes soon!

I just submitted one. ^_^ On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 11:53 PM Zhiyuan Ju wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a reminder for the FOSS Backstage event, welcome to submit your > talks before the closing time :) > > Best Regards! > @ Zhiyuan Ju > > > -- Forwarded message ---

Re: [DISCUSS] Support smart prioritization in route matching

hi: This is indeed an easier way to understand. I like this proposal very much. In this case, Route1 should have a higher priority than Route2. = { "name": "route1", "uri": "/_graphql", "vars": [ ["graphql_operation", "==", "query"], ["graphql_name",

[ANNOUNCE] New committer Shivam Singh

Hi, community, The Project Management Committee(PMC) of Apache APISIX has voted and invited Shivam Singh to be a committer. We are pleased to announce that he has accepted. -- *MembPhis* My GitHub: https://github.com/membphis Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix

Re: [DISCUSS] Use apisix-openresty instead of openresty

+1 `apisix-base` is better. On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 3:45 PM wei jin wrote: > I think `apisix-base` will be better than `apisix-openresty`. > > Zexuan Luo 于2021年9月28日周二 下午3:38写道： > > > What about using the name `apisix-base` instead of `apisix-openresty`? > > > > Joey Ma 于2021年9月27日周一 下午2:03写道

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.10.0

+1 (binding) I check: 1. All download links are fine; 2. Checksums and PGP signatures are fine; 3. LICENSE and NOTICE exist; 4. Build and run success on Debian. On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 12:42 AM Ayush das wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I have checked the following: > 1. Download links are OK. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Use apisix-openresty instead of openresty

I love the new way ^_^ On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 6:58 PM leslie Tsang wrote: > +1 > > > wei jin 於2021年9月26日 18:56寫道： > > > > Hi, community, > > > > The current APISIX image depends on the official version of openresty, > but > > APISIX needs to support more functions. > > > > For example, to int

Re: [DISCUSS/ANNOUNCEMENT] A new look to Apache APISIX website

cool job. 👍 On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 8:43 PM Shivam Singh wrote: > Hi community, > > I am psyched to announce to you all that the new redesigned and better > version of our website is in the final days of review and just short of a > single PR to be merged in the Apache APISIX website project. >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apply for a docker hub account to realize automatic push dashboard images to docker hub

+1 On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:52 AM Zeping Bai wrote: > +1 agree > > wei jin 于2021年9月10日周五 上午8:53写道： > > > Currently, when `apisix-dashboard` is building docker images, it cannot > be > > automatically pushed to docker hub. > > > > I hope to be able to automatically push to docker hub through g

Re: [DISCUSS] the blog about how to contribute to an OpenSource project without coding

big 👍 approved your PR. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 10:55 AM Ming Wen wrote: > Sure, any contribution is welcome. > It would be better if you have time to translate the article into English > > Thanks, > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > 赵若妃 于2021年9月9日周四 下午1:27写道： > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Support of geoip2 module for Openresty.

hi: https://github.com/anjia0532/lua-resty-maxminddb We can use this library, it is a solution that supports hot reloading and does not need to rebuild OpenResty. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 4:10 PM kushal kothari wrote: > Hi community, > > Understanding the GeoIP data for an incoming request is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Dashboard 2.8.0

I checked: Checked items: - All links are fine; - Signature and Checksum are fine; - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine; On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 6:28 PM Xiran Liu wrote: > Thanks zhiyuan, let me update it. > > update the edit-key command: > > when importing key manually, please pay attention to use th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Go Plugin Runner 0.2.0

+1 binding Check list: - Download links are fine - Checksums is fine - Signature is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE files On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 12:07 AM Ayush das wrote: > +1 non-binding > > I have checked: > - Download links are valid > - Checksums valid > - Signatures valid > - LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Relase Apache APISIX Python Plugin Runner 0.1.0

+1 binding Check list: - Download links are fine - Checksums is fine - Signature is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE files On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 3:29 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > Anyway, > +1 binding > > I checked: > - Download links are valid > - Checksums is valid > - Signature is vali

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX 2.9

+1 (binding) I checked: - Download links are valid - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid - LICENSE and NOTICE files - Build successfully on Debian 8.3.0-6 arm64 On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 8:57 PM JinChao Shuai wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - Download links are valid > - Checksums and

Re: [VOTE] Relase Apache APISIX Go Plugin Runner 0.1.0

+1 binding checked list: * download links are fine * checksum is fine * signature is fine * LICENSE and NOTICE files exist; ``` $ gpg --verify apisix-go-plugin-runner-0.1.0-src.tgz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in 'apisix-go-plugin-runner-0.1.0-src.tgz' gpg: Signature made Sun 11 Jul 2021 10:08:3

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Relase Apache APISIX Java Plugin Runner 0.1.0

cool ^_^ On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 10:50 AM Zexuan Luo wrote: > Hi, community, > Release vote for Apache APISIX Java Plugin Runner 0.1.0 has PASSED and > closed now. > > 3 PMC +1 votes: > - YuanSheng Wang > - Chao Zhang > - JunXu Chen > > > Vote thread: > &g

Re: [VOTE] Relase Apache APISIX Java Plugin Runner 0.1 Round 2

+1 checked list: * download links are fine * Checksums and signatures are fine On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 3:28 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > Hello, Community, > This is a call for the vote to release Apache APISIX Java Plugin > Runner version 0.1. > > Release notes: > > > https://github.com/apache/apisix

Re: [VOTE] Relase Apache APISIX 2.7 Round 2

+1 binding checklist: * download links are fine * signatures are fine * LICENSE and NOTICE files are good * build success on Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS ```shell ext-plugin-proto 0.1.1-0 is now installed in /home/resty/ins_pkg/deps (license: Apache License 2.0) Stopping after installing dependencies for

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Establish APISIX Go plugin runner

cool ^_^ On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 8:07 PM Ming Wen wrote: > hello, > hello, > The vote[1] for the new Apache APISIX Go runner GitHub repo was passed, and > the result is as follows: > > 6 binding +1: > - Junxu Chen > - zeping bai > - Joey Ma > - wei jin > - peter zhu > - chao zhang > > 2 non-bind

Re: [DISCUSS] Unbind the relationship in admin api

the `admin_api_object_bind` should be a URI argument, it can be specified by the API caller. On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:56 PM ZhengSong Tu wrote: > yes, this looks more accurate > > Zexuan Luo 于2021年5月24日周一 下午9:09写道： > > > `admin_api_object_bind ` is confusing. We always bind the objects. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache APISIX Dashboard 2.6.1 Round 2

+1 binding I checked: - All download links are valid - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid - LICENSE is OK - NOTICE is OK On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 4:34 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > +1 > > I checked: > - All links are valid > - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid > - LICENSE and NOTICE files ar

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache APISIX 2.6

nice ^_^ On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 5:03 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > Hi, community, > Release vote for Apache APISIX 2.6 has PASSED and closed now. > > 4 PMC +1 votes: > - Li Ling > - Chao Zhang > - Zhiyuan Ju > - JunXu Chen > > > Vote thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1c3c7a9e031cb64f3

Re: Proposal: inptroduce moesif plugin

nice feature +1 If @ZhengSong Tu needs any help, please let me know. ^_^ On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 8:03 AM Ming Wen wrote: > +1 > and cc to moesif engineer, we can work together to implement this plugin. > > Thanks, > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > ZhengSong Tu 于20

Re: [VOTE][New Subproject] Establish APISIX java plugin runner

+1 LGTM On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:26 PM 周健 wrote: > +1 > > Joey Ma 于2021年5月11日周二 下午6:06写道： > > > +1 for me. > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:06 PM ZhengSong Tu > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Dev Team: > > > > > > We would like to start a new proposal ablot creating APISIX java plugi

Re: [Icon Design]: creating our own uniform Apache APISIX flavoured icons for plugins

Are these icons all red? The red looks too bright. On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 12:52 PM Ayush das wrote: > Hey all devs! > I just need some suggestions of yours on my designed icons for plugins > > currently we are using Konga based icons. > > Here are my designs: > > a. drop shadow(x,-y) > < > h

Re: [Proposal] support using other languages to write plugin for APISIX

It is an easier way to support more languages through out-of-process RPC network communication. Nice proposal, I think we can make a try. ^_^ On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 11:52 AM Zexuan Luo wrote: > I am glad to hear that there is another option. > We can use flatbuffers as the codec instead of c

Re: Export Prometheus metrics in a new address

+1 for this too On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 2:59 PM Sheng Wu wrote: > SkyWalking tracer has its own configuration about target. > > Chao Zhang 于2021年4月3日 周六上午11:28写道： > > > Are there any other types of data that also should be kept sensitive > > like Prometheus metrics? > > If so, we may have a gen

Re: Investigate the necessity of building SkyWalking LUA metrics/meter APIs

grpc gateway? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Zexuan Luo 于2021年3月21日 周日13:35写道： > > > > > > > > > > > Another solution is wrapping the C++ implementation of th

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

at 7:20 PM Zexuan Luo wrote: > I think the first type is not necessarily as we already have dns discovery. > > We can use: > > ``` > { > "upstream_host": "httpbin.org", > "type":"roundrobin", > "service_name"

Re: Investigate the necessity of building SkyWalking LUA metrics/meter APIs

LGTM > The biggest advantage of ALS, is replacing the physical local access log file. The APISIX has a plugin `http-logger`, I think APISIX is easy to report those data to SkyWalking. And I think we can try to use `gRPC` to report data. What do you think? @ming @spacewander On Fri, Mar 19, 20

  1   2   3   4   5   >