brigade/bucket splitting (was: Re: cvs commit: apr-util STATUS)x

On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:14:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... > I'll buy this. I can see this being somewhat useful. Part of me thinks > this should be implemented as a brigade_seek function. The calling code > would then be responsible for calling ap_bucket_split and > ap_brigade_spli

Re: [PATCH] Buckets: add copy function, ap_bucket_split_any(), etc

> > > Thoughts? > > > > Any error condition should return NULL in ap_brigade_split_offset. > > Also note that we generally don't want to validate arguments and return > APR_EINVAL. The assumption is the caller passes legal arguments. > > len > brigade-len shouldn't be an error -- it should just

Re: [PATCH] ap_brigade_split_any

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Greg Stein wrote: > I'm not sure where this semantic was introduced. (I'll blame Ryan :-) > > The intent isn't to create *another* brigade. It is to split a bucket > *within* a brigade. The specific operation that we want to provide for is > within the byterange filter: > >

Re: [PATCH] ap_brigade_split_any

I'm not sure where this semantic was introduced. (I'll blame Ryan :-) The intent isn't to create *another* brigade. It is to split a bucket *within* a brigade. The specific operation that we want to provide for is within the byterange filter: 1) split a bucket at points P1 and P2 2) copy buckets

Re: [PATCH] Buckets: add copy function, ap_bucket_split_any(), etc

On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 03:24:08PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Question: In the bucket split functions, a sanity check is performed on the > > point > > passed in: if point is < 0 or > len, APR_EINVAL is returned. What should > > be the > > brigade-splitting equivalent of that? Shoul

RE: Showstoppers: Alpha 9

I'm +1 on everything below ... including adding src/ to apr since neither Ryan or I feel real strongly about it. Either way, with or without src/, we should be able to pick-n-choose our packaging, and either way we will stumble somewhere. Let's move forward, and thanks for the offer to clean up t

Re: Showstoppers: Alpha 9

[ let's all smack OtherBill for breaking Ryan's and my replies :-) ] On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 01:45:48PM -0800, Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote: >... I wrote: > > Does nobody read the STATUS file? Didn't I put all this in there and state > that it would get cleared up by tonite for our release tomor

Re: testfile

> > If this doesn't work on some platform, then that platform is just > > broken. > > Uh oh, not another platform slipping off the RyanApproved(tm) list :) No, just a platform we need to provide a work-around for, which I did below. This is still a broken platform however. :-) Ryan ___

Re: testfile

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If this doesn't work on some platform, then that platform is just > broken. Uh oh, not another platform slipping off the RyanApproved(tm) list :) >Please try forcing APR to use select() instead of poll() to do > the actual waiting. This is accomplished by just

RE: new APR package

> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:57 AM > > Greg Stein wrote: > > > > Okay... we seem to have some general agreement to make a "non-core" > > APR package that contains the "purely portable" items. With that in > > mind, here are my rough

Re: new APR package

&&@[EMAIL PROTECTED] missing reply-to again.. -- #kenP-(} Ken Coar Apache Software Foundation "Apache Server for Dummies" "Apache Server Unleashed" --- Begin Messag

RE: src/ directory (was: Re: apr-util comments)x

> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:01 AM > > > From: Greg Stein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 7:38 AM > > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:26:05AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > > > the only way

Re: Showstoppers: Alpha 9

Replying to the correct address now. On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > 1. is sdbm an -internally- packaged function, as is mm? (my 2c says yes) > >If so, it has no business being distributed in > > httpd-2.0/include/apr-util, > >since we certainly wouldn't distribute

Re: testfile

> > It hangs on 3.4. I need to get somewhere quickly or I'd try it on > > Linux now. Frankly, that use of poll looks questionable and I am > > guessing that FreeBSD doesn't wake up a poll in that situation. > > It works on Linux, of course. I still suspect that this use of poll > just doesn't

Showstoppers: Alpha 9

Ok, two showstoppers exist for A9, in my (convoluted) mind; 1. is sdbm an -internally- packaged function, as is mm? (my 2c says yes) If so, it has no business being distributed in httpd-2.0/include/apr-util, since we certainly wouldn't distribute mm.h either. Same goes with apu_confi

[wrowe@rowe-clan.net: RE: The iconv solution?]

[resending...] - Forwarded message from "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: The iconv solution? To: "'Greg Stein'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 12:18:27 -0600 This is done. Attics to be purged at 12:00

Re: URI, XML

On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:32:49PM -0800, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > I was just wondering if URI and XML are going to get get moved out of apache > before > the Alpha such that the files can be removed from the httpd-2.0 repository > before > tagging. It might not be worth it for just a few files