Re: APR_MKDIR() attempt #2

2001-01-10 Thread Branko Čibej
Mo DeJong wrote: I sent this patch in some time ago, but I did not hear anything back so I though I would post it again. This patch fixes the build in the case where apr is compiled in a build dir that is not the src dir. This only matters when another module uses the RUN_SUBDIR_CONFIG_NOW() macro.

Re: APR_MKDIR() attempt #2

2001-01-10 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 12:14:28PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote: > I sent this patch in some time ago, but > I did not hear anything back so I though > I would post it again. This patch fixes > the build in the case where apr is > compiled in a build dir that is not > the src dir. This only matters when

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Greg Stein
Yay! I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't going to try and remove it, though :-) Cheers, -g On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:01:33AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > bjh 01/01/09 17:01:33 > > Modified:.Makefile.in configure.in > Log: > Li

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Brian Havard
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:17:16 -0800, Greg Stein wrote: >Yay! > >I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't >going to try and remove it, though :-) Yeah, libtool has a few nice features. I just wish it didn't slow the build to a crawl. For me, APR now takes over 5x as l

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Sascha Schumann
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Brian Havard wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:17:16 -0800, Greg Stein wrote: > > >Yay! > > > >I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't > >going to try and remove it, though :-) > > Yeah, libtool has a few nice features. I just wish it didn't slow

Re: cvs commit: apr Makefile.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Brian Havard
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 12:57:36 +0100 (CET), Sascha Schumann wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Brian Havard wrote: > >> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:17:16 -0800, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> >Yay! >> > >> >I always hated that thing. I did enough damage last night, that I wasn't >> >going to try and remove it, though

Sockopt patch

2001-01-10 Thread David Reid
I've stuck the latest version of the patch at http://httpd.apache.org/~dreid/sockopt_diff If I don't hear any negatives I'll commit when I get back from my course on Saturday morning. david

Re: cvs commit: apr APRVARS.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
Oops... I meant to follow up to the list... trying again. Note also that upgrading to libtool 1.3.4 and libtool 1.3.5 didn't help. Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That patch is just plain wrong. Usable as a stopgap, but not something to be > committed. > > I was dead tired last night a

Re: cvs commit: apr APRVARS.in configure.in

2001-01-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oops... I meant to follow up to the list... trying again. > > Note also that upgrading to libtool 1.3.4 and libtool 1.3.5 didn't > help. Double loser... I didn't blow away ltmain.sh after upgrading, and ltmain.sh is where the bug was. libtool 1.3.4 h

Re: cvs commit: apr/user/unix .cvsignore Makefile.in

2001-01-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > gstein 01/01/09 03:06:29 > > Libtool-ize APR. > Index: Makefile.in > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/shmem/unix/Makefile.in,v > retrieving revision 1.14 > retrieving revision 1.15 > diff -

Re: cvs commit: apr/user/unix .cvsignore Makefile.in

2001-01-10 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > gstein 01/01/09 03:06:29 > > > > Libtool-ize APR. > > Index: Makefile.in > > === > > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/shmem/unix/Makefile.in,v > > retr

Re: cvs commit: apr/user/unix .cvsignore Makefile.in

2001-01-10 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 02:52:05PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > gstein 01/01/09 03:06:29 > > > > > > Libtool-ize APR. > > > Index: Makefile.in > > > =