On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:54:22AM -0800, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
>OK, make on Darwin finishes without errors. I get these libraries:
>
> [joliet-jake:~/Developer/Apache/apr] wsanchez% find . -name \*.dylib -o
> -name \*.a
> ./.libs/libapr.a
> ./.libs/libapr.dylib
> ./shmem/unix/mm/.libs/lib
>OK, make on Darwin finishes without errors. I get these libraries:
>
> [joliet-jake:~/Developer/Apache/apr] wsanchez% find . -name \*.dylib -o
> -name \*.a
> ./.libs/libapr.a
> ./.libs/libapr.dylib
> ./shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a
>
>Do I want to work on getting libmm to build dynamica
OK, make on Darwin finishes without errors. I get these libraries:
[joliet-jake:~/Developer/Apache/apr] wsanchez% find . -name \*.dylib -o
-name \*.a
./.libs/libapr.a
./.libs/libapr.dylib
./shmem/unix/mm/.libs/libmm.a
Do I want to work on getting libmm to build dynamically, or is it
expecte
> A key characteristic we need is to make sure that our assumption about
> const-ness compiles at all on the platform, whether or not gcc is
> being used. It is my understanding that certain platforms besides
> glibc-2.2+gcc-recent will fail the compile if the const-ness is
> wrong. IRIX was an e
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> fielding01/02/08 16:56:05
>
> Modified:.CHANGES apr_common.m4
> Log:
> Add APR_TRY_GCC_WARNING macro to dynamically test the iconv prototype
> if gcc is being used.
This turned out a little different than I imagined :)
A key characteristic we
> rbb 01/02/08 22:19:44
>
> Modified:buckets apr_brigade.c
>include apr_buckets.h
> Log:
> Allow brigades to buffer data natively with apr_brigade_write,
> apr_brigade_puts, etc. This uses a heap bucket to store the data at the
> end of the brigade. If th
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:56:14PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:12:28PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > trawick 01/02/08 14:12:28
> > >
> > > Modified:.configure.in
> > > Log:
> > > look in -lm for
Oh, I get it. LPW tries to install /usr/bin/HEAD and stomps
/usr/bin/head because it's HFS+.
Eit.
-Fred
Wilfredo Sánchez - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Software Foundation
On Thursday, February 8, 2001, at 04:14 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is the output from libwww-perl's head script, which should
have been installed as lwphead or HEAD to avoid this conflict.
Aw, hell.
[joliet-jake:~] wsanchez% file /usr/bin/head
/usr/bin/head: perl commands text
What kinda st
Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > on lines 278 and 283 you replace put with pupt for apr_os_exp_time_put
> > and apr_os_thread_put. i assume that's wrong, since i can't for the
> > life of me figure out what pupt would mean ;-)
>
> good
Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:12:28PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > trawick 01/02/08 14:12:28
> >
> > Modified:.configure.in
> > Log:
> > look in -lm for modf()
> >
> > This gets APR test programs linking on Tru64. It may res
> > 1) The #ifdef APR_ in xlate.c must be a #if
>
> Why is that? We generally use #ifdef FOO if FOO is sometimes defined
> and sometimes not (e.g., APR_ICONV_INBUF_CONST). We generally use #if
> FOO if FOO is always defined but sometimes to 1 and sometimes to 0
> (e.g., APR_HAS_XLATE).
Sorry,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
> Anybody recognize that usage output? Certainly looks
> Apache-ish, but I can't find it in APR.
It's a Perl script that's part of LWP:
pantheon: ~>HEAD -1
Unknown option: 1
Usage: HEAD [-options] ...
-muse method for the request (default
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:44:08PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > >
> > >> It looks like Greg has taken care of Subversion, but did anyone else see
> > >> Doug's commit message go by or did my mailer drop it on the floor?
> > >
> > > i committ
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 10:12:28PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> trawick 01/02/08 14:12:28
>
> Modified:.configure.in
> Log:
> look in -lm for modf()
>
> This gets APR test programs linking on Tru64. It may result in a
> double -lm on some platforms, as we autodet
> Apparently, shtool is invoking "head -1" which should be fine, because
> head *does* accept a -1 argument, but instead some other program with
> the above usage is being invoked and I can't figure out why this might
> be the case. Anybody recognize that usage output? Certainly looks
> Apach
At 05:03 PM 02/08/2001, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
Unknown option: 1
Usage: head [-options] ...
-muse method for the request (default is 'HEAD')
This looks like a Perl program, from the LWP package (get, head, post).
--
Greg Marr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm be
17 matches
Mail list logo