Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sendrecv.c

2001-02-17 Thread Greg Stein
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:34:09PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... > +/* HP-UX can only send one header iovec and one footer iovec; try to > + * only allocate storage to combine input iovecs when we really have to > + */ >... > +/* XXX: BUHHH? wow, what a memory le

Re: SGI's Accelerating Apache project

2001-02-17 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Actually, this is a better forum to consider your suggestion - Original Message - From: "Jon Smirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 9:39 PM Subject: Re: SGI's Accelerating Apache project > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It would actually be quite int

Re: SGI's Accelerating Apache project

2001-02-17 Thread Brian Behlendorf
> From: "Jon Smirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > If there are licensing concerns with Mozilla's code in my experience the > > Mozilla lawyers will do whatever it takes to resolve the differences so that > > the code can be used. The Apache license and the Mozilla license should be compatible - that

Re: SGI's Accelerating Apache project

2001-02-17 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 01:01:01AM -0800, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > > From: "Jon Smirl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > If there are licensing concerns with Mozilla's code in my experience the > > > Mozilla lawyers will do whatever it takes to resolve the differences so > > > that > > > the code c

Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sendrecv.c

2001-02-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 09:34:09PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >... > > +/* HP-UX can only send one header iovec and one footer iovec; try to > > + * only allocate storage to combine input iovecs when we really have > > to > > + */

Re: Working platforms - HP-UX 11.00

2001-02-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Notes regarding HP-UX compilation with latest CVS snapshots > of httpd-2.0, apr, and apr-util: > > config.guess: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00 > uname: HP-UX B.11.00 U 9000/800 > HP's Ansi C compiler (non-free): HP C/HP-UX Version A.11.01.00 > MPM: prefork

Re: Working platforms - HP-UX 11.00

2001-02-17 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:40:38AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >... > > There were some compiler warnings, but I didn't really pay attention > > to those (seemed mostly harmless). > > I fixed some and also have an uncommitted patch to add > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED (forgive spelling mistakes here

Re: Working platforms - HP-UX 11.00

2001-02-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 08:40:38AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >... > > > There were some compiler warnings, but I didn't really pay attention > > > to those (seemed mostly harmless). > > > > I fixed some and also have an uncommitted patch to add > > -D

Re: SGI's Accelerating Apache project

2001-02-17 Thread rbb
> > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > It would actually be quite interesting to see APR ported to build against > > > STM and see what happens when the threaded MPM is thrown against APR/STM. > > > > Could this be taken even further and merge APR and NSPR into a single > > run-time lib

Re: SGI's Accelerating Apache project

2001-02-17 Thread Jon Smirl
I have forwarded copies of this mail thread to the NSPR developers. They don't seem to be around this weekend so it may be Monday before you hear from them. If Apache and Mozilla can come to agreement on merging run-times there is other interesting code in Mozilla as well. For example I already h

RE: Working platforms - HP-UX 11.00

2001-02-17 Thread Cliff Woolley
--- Jeff Trawick said: > (by the way, we don't build with the HP compiler on HP 10.20; need to > look lots further into which compiler I have access to and why it > doesn't like some seemingly benign declarations in APR) That doesn't surprise me... HP-UX's native compiler has been known to do some

Re: Working platforms - HP-UX 11.00

2001-02-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- Jeff Trawick said: > > (by the way, we don't build with the HP compiler on HP 10.20; need to > > look lots further into which compiler I have access to and why it > > doesn't like some seemingly benign declarations in APR) > > That doesn't surprise

Re: cvs commit: apr-util Makefile.in

2001-02-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Index: Makefile.in > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/Makefile.in,v > retrieving revision 1.40 > retrieving revision 1.41 > diff -u -r1.40 -r1.41 > --- Makefile.in 2001/02/16 10:17:10 1.4

Re: cvs commit: apr-util Makefile.in

2001-02-17 Thread Greg Stein
I've reversed those changes. On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 03:35:18PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Index: Makefile.in > > === > > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/Makefile.in,v > > retrieving revision 1.40 >

Re: cvs commit: apr-util Makefile.in

2001-02-17 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 04:10:55PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >... > --- Makefile.in 2001/02/01 21:54:22 1.32 > +++ Makefile.in 2001/02/17 16:10:54 1.33 > @@ -55,3 +55,6 @@ > >exports.c: $(EXPORT_FILES) > (cat $(EXPORT_FILES) | ../build/buildexports.sh ..) >