Re: httpd-2.0/apr/apr-util Code Freeze

2001-03-07 Thread Jeff Trawick
"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can we begin a code freeze, excepting _minor_ build and code fixes, until > we have > a stable tarball ready to share? I have win32 folks trying to make > apache2.0a9 build, > this just doesn't make any sense. Once Ryan's patch is in, let'

Re: httpd-2.0/apr/apr-util Code Freeze

2001-03-07 Thread rbb
I'm tagging and rolling right now. The tree currently builds on Windows and Linux, and I believe based on Jeff's recent commits, I have to believe that it compiles everyplace else. It also works on OS/2 and BeOS AFAIK. Tag and roll coming in the next hour or so. Ryan On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Will

Re: httpd-2.0/apr/apr-util Code Freeze

2001-03-07 Thread Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
william, the apache project is, i assume, suffering from the effects of many developers using cvs at the same time? if so, can i recommend reading the description of how to ease the pain of #3 below, described in http://advogato.org/article/247.html it outlines how to use cvs to do one or more s

Re: httpd-2.0/apr/apr-util Code Freeze

2001-03-07 Thread rbb
There are a couple of bugs in the STATUS file that I started hunting today. Can we shoot for a tarball roll of sometime on Thursday or Friday? I agree, the no-freeze model just doesn't work in this environment. Ryan On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Folks, > > I'm going to

httpd-2.0/apr/apr-util Code Freeze

2001-03-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Folks, I'm going to propose something radical. Although Jeff's recent commit points out a potentially serious problem (discrepancy between the file size and file offset types) in the Win32 APR, which I will look at today, this server appears rather stable, and buildable, and rbb will have 't

Re: mm.h and -I/usr/local/include problems

2001-03-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On our machine (BS2000) there is a mm.h in /usr/local/include and it is > > conflicting with the APR one in srclib/apr/shmem/unix/mm. We need to use > > CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" for the configure be

Re: mm.h and -I/usr/local/include problems

2001-03-07 Thread rbb
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > On our machine (BS2000) there is a mm.h in /usr/local/include and it is > conflicting with the APR one in srclib/apr/shmem/unix/mm. We need to use > CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" for the configure because the basic > /usr/include only gives

mm.h and -I/usr/local/include problems

2001-03-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, On our machine (BS2000) there is a mm.h in /usr/local/include and it is conflicting with the APR one in srclib/apr/shmem/unix/mm. We need to use CFLAGS="-I/usr/local/include" for the configure because the basic /usr/include only gives a very reduced set of includes. The problem is due to that