On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 07:59:10AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The same thing is happening with
> >
> > SUBDIRS = lib
> >
> > all: $(SUBDIRS)
> >
> > $(SUBDIRS) :
> > cd $@; make
> >
> > It thinks lib is up-to-date and won't rebuild it, even
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 01:03:40PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -all: $(SUBDIRS)
> +all: build-subdirs
>
>.PHONY: all $(SUBDIRS) clean distclean maintainer-clean dist install \
>uninstall distdir
Shouldn't you add build-subdirs to .PHONY now?
> @@ -105,9 +105,11 @@
> > surely that's not too much process to cause more pain than the benefits
> > are worth, neh?
>
> There is a lot of resistance to using tags and branches the way you
> suggest Luke.
okay: i have to admit - i made a mistake in "oversimplifying" what i
suggested [full branching of an entire sub-t
sorry: this suggestion - a full tagging of an entire project - was a
mistake.
i repeat, i am NOT advocating that the use of branching like this is a
good idea. in fact, it is an extremely dangerous one. imo.
luke
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2001, G
> > > _however_ :)
>
> Saw that coming :-)
oh, darn :)
> > > once you _get_ to the point where cvs main is
> > > always-releasable, then using this multi-tag process could help make cvs
> > > main _remain_ always-releasable.
>
> We only need it releasable when we want to release :-)
>
> Serio
> ... i've worked in long-term branches.
>
> i do not recommend it.
afterthought. just to clarify, the above sentence is a serious
understatement.
luke
- Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
"i want a world of dreams, run by near-sighted visionaries"
"good. that's them
Hi,
I was wondering if there were any plans or if there should be any
plans for adding a relational database abstraction layer to apr (similar
to Perl's DBI)? I noticed there is dbm in apr-util but it doesn't
look like it's meant for relational databases.
john.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:52:08PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if there were any plans or if there should be any
> plans for adding a relational database abstraction layer to apr (similar
> to Perl's DBI)? I noticed there is dbm in apr-util but it doesn't
> look lik
