Oh, apxs doesn't know about this file. Yuck. I think that apache-1.3
As I've mentioned maybe a dozen times over the past six months, apxs does
not work in 2.0. It needs to be taught how to use config_vars.mk or,
at the very least, all of its current symbols need to be replaced with
those used
Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All variables are an approximation -- cosmic rays can change the value as
well, with only a slightly smaller probability than mid-increment time
slices in a non-test system.
hmmm... I've seen many fixes needed for several instruction
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
maybe the description of APR_INCOMPLETE should be made more vague
(slightly less useful to somebody trying to see what it means) to
cover different uses?
but programmers are one thing, and they can grep the source code if
they're
Roy T. Fielding at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, apxs doesn't know about this file. Yuck. I think that apache-1.3
As I've mentioned maybe a dozen times over the past six months, apxs does
not work in 2.0. It needs to be taught how to use config_vars.mk or,
at the very least, all of its
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:49:53PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes01/08/06 08:49:53
apr/locks/NetWare - New directory
Shouldn't it be netware? -- justin
apr/locks/NetWare has been renamed to apr/locks/netware
apr/threadproc/NetWare has been renamed to apr/threadproc/netware
Sorry, these got by me during the check in
Brad
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, August 06, 2001 9:52:27 AM
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:49:53PM -, [EMAIL
I assume that this is just a typo. However, I have no way to test it.
But it seems it wasn't tested as well as you might hope before it was
committed.
Greg
---
Index: srclib/apr/include//apr_portable.h
Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume that this is just a typo. However, I have no way to test it.
But it seems it wasn't tested as well as you might hope before it was
committed.
I'd assume that too. Let me see what happens if the typo is fixed.
It may be that a header file would
On 6 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#ifdef NETWARE
+uint64_t sec;
+uint64_t usec;
+
+NXGetTime(NX_SINCE_1970, NX_SECONDS, sec);
+NXGetTime(NX_SINCE_1970, NX_USECONDS, usec);
+*uuid_time = (sec * 1000) + (usec * 10) +
+
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There shouldn't be a reason to call connect again in the chunk
below since apr_wait_io_or_timeout should return success if we can
use the socket or error if we've timeout.
The purpose of the connect call is to find out whether or we have a
connection. It is much
The problem is that the second connect() call is failing with an
EALREADYCONNECTED.
The correct way to detect an error from connect, according to Single Unix, is
to do a poll
or select. If select/poll return with an error or they timeout, the connect
failed. If they return
successfully, then
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that the second connect() call is failing with an
EALREADYCONNECTED.
The correct way to detect an error from connect, according to Single Unix, is
to do a poll
or select. If select/poll return with an error or they timeout, the connect
Sorry for the confusion. I actually did mean to check it in with the
EnterDebugger() call there. I still have not had a chance to fully verify this
routine mainly because I haven't ported the test for it yet. So as a note to
myself, (which will cause the NetWare debugger to display so
I watched it fail on a FreeBSD machine.
For an example of code that uses a non-blocking accept:
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cs779/stevens2nd/lib/connect_nonb.c
Ryan
On Monday 06 August 2001 14:48, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that the second
apr_connect() is returning EISCONN instead of APR_SUCCESS
on a FreeBSD 4.2 machine.
barbee.
On 06 Aug 2001 17:48:21 -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
allegedly said:
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is that the second connect() call is failing with
an EALREADYCONNECTED.
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. I actually did mean to check it in with
the EnterDebugger() call there. I still have not had a chance to
fully verify this routine mainly because I haven't ported the test for
it yet. So as a note to myself, (which will
16 matches
Mail list logo
