On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2001 01:56 pm, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On some versions of Linux/Solaris fstat(2) gives you a second granularity
of mtime/atime/ctime. On some other OS-es/versions you get mSec's.
Is there a way to ask APR what the
Is anyone using this file? I'm working on getting AIX builds to work with
shared objects, and I'd like to get APR's symbol exporting system to work
the way httpd's does. I'll probably end up changing the name to apr.exp
unless someone objects. Same goes for aprutil.exports -- aprutil.exp.
-aaron
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Is there a way to ask APR what the granularity is ?
All APR times are mSec.
Yes, but if the OS stores only seconds for the mtime, the APR time is
seconds*APR_USEC_PER_SEC, right? So while there are extra zeros at the
end, that doesn't
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 05:22:04PM -0700, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Is there a way to ask APR what the granularity is ?
Is it right to assume that the reason you need this is so that the httpd
will mark a message with a Date that is later than the Last-Modified, hence
avoiding problems
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 05:44:38PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
no!!! Because of this, we're returning APR_CHILD_NOTDONE when a
child exits due to a signal (like SIGSEGV)... thus Apache isn't able
to see that the segfault happened and the log message is broken.
The old code had this
On Friday 12 October 2001 07:52 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 05:22:04PM -0700, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Is there a way to ask APR what the granularity is ?
Is it right to assume that the reason you need this is so that the httpd
will mark a message with a Date
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 05:44:38PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
no!!! Because of this, we're returning APR_CHILD_NOTDONE when a
child exits due to a signal (like SIGSEGV)... thus Apache isn't able
to see that the segfault happened and the log
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 02:06:30PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 05:44:38PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
no!!! Because of this, we're returning APR_CHILD_NOTDONE when a
child exits due to a signal (like SIGSEGV)...
