> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 April 2002 20:05
> To: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Get dependency generation working with VPATH
>
>
> Since this is a fairly large patch, I'll post it first to give
> people a chance to comment.
>
> This attempts to get "ma
Since this is a fairly large patch, I'll post it first to give
people a chance to comment.
This attempts to get "make depend" working when using VPATH. Since
we rely on $(srcdir) to always be defined, I'm adding srcdir and
VPATH to all Makefiles. This also has the (good) side-effect of
making th
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I committed this second part as with that testatomic passes here
> on my Linux/SMP box.
It passed for me beforehand on my non-SMP linux box, but it still passes
afterward, so +1 on that commit.
--Cliff
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> The mutex-based apr_atomic.c code looks like it hasn't really been
> finished, but with this patch, the "testatomic" passes except for a "no
> surprise" result which I presume is supposed to happen. (without the
> patch ATOMIC_HASH coul
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:36:08PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joe Orton wrote:
Sure - I'd just hope the change could be made for the time being, until
someone gets round to that, since currently APR won't build on
combinations of modern glibc/kernel.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:36:08PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> > Sure - I'd just hope the change could be made for the time being, until
> > someone gets round to that, since currently APR won't build on
> > combinations of modern glibc/kernel.
>
> Whic
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On 18 Apr 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Since APR_EOF is one of the errors you might get back from
apr_file_read(), I agree with Jeff. This:
while (apr_file_read(file, buffer, &len) != APR_SUCCESS)
{
...
}
is probably preferable. You'll most l
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 10:40:12AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Since APR_EOF is one of the errors you might get back from
> apr_file_read(), I agree with Jeff. This:
>
> > > while (apr_file_read(file, buffer, &len) != APR_SUCCESS)
> > >
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Joe Orton wrote:
> Sure - I'd just hope the change could be made for the time being, until
> someone gets round to that, since currently APR won't build on
> combinations of modern glibc/kernel.
Which combinations? It works fine for me on glibc 2.2.5 / linux 2.4.18.
Granted,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:38:31AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >There are issues with use of asm/atomic.h on Linux: according to the
> >kernel gurus here this is a header for internal use of the kernel,
> >and shouldn't be used from userspace.
> >
> >The problems are, if I unde
> Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just my 2cents; you'll do want you want.
That did *not* come out right... :)
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A socie
Joe Orton wrote:
There are issues with use of asm/atomic.h on Linux: according to the
kernel gurus here this is a header for internal use of the kernel,
and shouldn't be used from userspace.
The problems are, if I understand them correctly:
- with newer kernel/glibc combinations (e.g the RHL7.3 bet
Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AFAIK no one else has described the same problem, so I'd be
> hesistant about making it the default on systems that define
> SA_NOCLDWAIT and aren't tru64. We may tickle something that we
> may not want to be messing with.
Can somebody besides me and Da
AFAIK no one else has described the same problem, so I'd be
hesistant about making it the default on systems that define
SA_NOCLDWAIT and aren't tru64. We may tickle something that we
may not want to be messing with.
Just my 2cents; you'll do want you want.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> This patch loo
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>2. What's the idiomatic apr read till eof? From grepping the source
> >>code, I see apr_file_eof is hardly ever used. Is something wrong with:
> >>
> >> while (!apr_file_eof(fp
Dave Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
> I have run into a problem on Compaq Tru64 with cgi processes
> being reaped when using with mpm worker.
>
> I had always thought the signal(SIGCHLD,SIG_IGN) would always
> cause child processes to quietly go away but
This patc
On 18 Apr 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Since APR_EOF is one of the errors you might get back from
apr_file_read(), I agree with Jeff. This:
> > while (apr_file_read(file, buffer, &len) != APR_SUCCESS)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
is probably preferable. You'll most l
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
2. What's the idiomatic apr read till eof? From grepping the source
code, I see apr_file_eof is hardly ever used. Is something wrong with:
while (!apr_file_eof(fp)) {
rc = apr_file_read(fp, buf, &nbytes);
.
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> without this patch, while(!apr_file_eof(...)) spins for unbuffered
> fh. ...
Committed... Thanks!
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2. What's the idiomatic apr read till eof? From grepping the source
> code, I see apr_file_eof is hardly ever used. Is something wrong with:
>
> while (!apr_file_eof(fp)) {
> rc = apr_file_read(fp, buf, &nbytes);
> ...
>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> There are issues with use of asm/atomic.h on Linux: according to the
> kernel gurus here this is a header for internal use of the kernel,
> and shouldn't be used from userspace.
>
> The problems are, if I understand them correctly:
>
>
There are issues with use of asm/atomic.h on Linux: according to the
kernel gurus here this is a header for internal use of the kernel,
and shouldn't be used from userspace.
The problems are, if I understand them correctly:
- with newer kernel/glibc combinations (e.g the RHL7.3 beta) this stuff
r
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> Hi,
> currently to do a vpath build you have to create certain directories in
> directory that you wish to build in, ie:
> build/
> srclib/{apr,apr-util,pcre,expat-lite}
> docs/conf
>
> This patch enables you to create a clean directory a
At 10:29 PM 4/17/2002, you wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
While we consider Stas' ideas for a portable tmpdir, we should also consider
breaking apart path strings (such as env('PATH'), or LIB or INCLUDE paths
as well.) These semantics change considerably from Win32 to unix and
other platforms.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
While we consider Stas' ideas for a portable tmpdir, we should also
consider
breaking apart path strings (such as env('PATH'), or LIB or INCLUDE paths
as well.) These semantics change considerably from Win32 to unix and
other platforms. I dunno what NetWare does here,
25 matches
Mail list logo
