On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:11:59PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> parameters. I would like to fix that mistake for apr_poll now, as long
> as we are changing the implementation.
Getting back to this conversation for a brief second, I think the
additional parameter with the fd count is unneeded (but f
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 July 2002 09:44
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:11:59PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > parameters. I would like to fix that mistake for apr_poll now, as long
> > as we are changing the implementation.
>
> Getting back to this conversation
Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check is a lot more than two files, and the port to Windows could be
> kind of tough. The problem is that it requires fork() for a lot of what
> it does, and although I haven't looked at the code in great depth, the
> parts I have looked at just look very U
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 July 2002 16:06
> Okay, I have looked at two different test suite options.
>
> 1) Check -- GPL licensed. Doesn't work on Windows.
> http://check.sourceforge.net/
>
> 2) CuTest -- Zlib license. Doesn't currently work on Unix, but I
The following patch, for which I have to give much credit for the
inspiration to the OpenSSL guys, allows one to simply do a --with-egd
when doing a configure, which will cause the probe of a set of
pre-determined sockets for egd. One can still do a --with-egd=blah
with this patch.
Looking for com
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:11:59PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > parameters. I would like to fix that mistake for apr_poll now, as
long
> > as we are changing the implementation.
>
> Getting back to this conversation for a brief second, I th
> > Okay, I have looked at two different test suite options.
> >
> > 1) Check -- GPL licensed. Doesn't work on Windows.
> > http://check.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > 2) CuTest -- Zlib license. Doesn't currently work on Unix, but I
> > have patches already. I'll be submitting them later today
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:11:59PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > parameters. I would like to fix that mistake for apr_poll now, as
> long
> > > as we are changing the implementation.
> >
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't you take a look at the test framework that was cooked up
> in subversion?
>
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/subversion/tests/
>
> It is currently only used for subversion, but I think you will be able
> to leverage that code wi
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 July 2002 16:47
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why don't you take a look at the test framework that was cooked up
> > in subversion?
> >
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/subversion/tests/
> >
> > I
"Victor J. Orlikowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following patch, for which I have to give much credit for the
> inspiration to the OpenSSL guys, allows one to simply do a --with-egd
> when doing a configure, which will cause the probe of a set of
> pre-determined sockets for egd. One can
Marcus Comstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These are policy questions, so they have to be discussed a bit more.
> For the moment, only inexact translation is offered by apr_xlate
> anyway, so there's no need to rush.
Agreed.
Sorry, folks, I accidentally CC'd a Subversion message to the APR list
a moment ago. Here is the message I *meant* to CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Marcus Comstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... avoid the call to iconv_open if both charsets are the same.
> (That's not just an optimization, at least
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 July 2002 15:46
>> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 12:11:59PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
parameters. I would like to fix that mistake for apr_pol
14 matches
Mail list logo
