Re: RTC on 0.9.x? was Re: svn commit: r161087 - in apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x: CHANGES include/apr_reslist.h misc/apr_reslist.c

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Paul Querna wrote: > > I believe APR 0.9.x is under CTR. I was also under the impression that all branches of APR were CTR. However, I agree that discussion on API changes would be good, even in a CTR system. That has always been the basic idea with CTR -- you can commit wi

RTC on 0.9.x? was Re: svn commit: r161087 - in apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x: CHANGES include/apr_reslist.h misc/apr_reslist.c

Paul Querna wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:38 PM 4/12/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: pquerna Date: Tue Apr 12 11:38:21 2005 New Revision: 161087 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161087 Log: Backport apr_reslist_timeout_set and apr_reslist_invalidate. These functions

Re: svn commit: r161087 - in apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x: CHANGES include/apr_reslist.h misc/apr_reslist.c

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 01:38 PM 4/12/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: pquerna Date: Tue Apr 12 11:38:21 2005 New Revision: 161087 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161087 Log: Backport apr_reslist_timeout_set and apr_reslist_invalidate. These functions have been in 1.x f

Re: svn commit: r161087 - in apr/apr-util/branches/0.9.x: CHANGES include/apr_reslist.h misc/apr_reslist.c

At 01:38 PM 4/12/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Author: pquerna >Date: Tue Apr 12 11:38:21 2005 >New Revision: 161087 > >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=161087 >Log: > >Backport apr_reslist_timeout_set and apr_reslist_invalidate. > >These functions have been in 1.x for a long time.