Re: APR with SCTP streams.

2005-11-15 Thread Preethi Natarajan
Hello, As per earlier discussion, I am trying to merge my changes with the latest APR trunk. I got this through svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/ I am not able to get the configure script from configure.in : complains about AC_PROG_LIBTOOL; I tried to work around that then

Re: cross-process, named mutex

2005-11-15 Thread Aaron Bannert
Could you post the code that is failing? -aaron On Nov 15, 2005, at 11:58 AM, Daniel May wrote: Neither apr_proc_mutex or apr_global_mutex seem to work under Linux. I created a simple single instance case where I created a named mutex in an test program and paused. I started a second in

Re: apr-util config, etc.

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Darroch
Justin: >>I do the same to get Berkeley DB to work with apr-util, with >> the -Wl,-R option. That seems to be sufficient to ensure that >> configure's test programs compile and execute. (For some reason, >> just having -L doesn't do it, and configure wrongly decides that >> BDB can't be foun

Re: apr-util config, etc.

2005-11-15 Thread Nick Kew
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 20:44, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On November 15, 2005 3:36:39 PM -0500 Chris Darroch (For the record, Chris and I have developed an apr_dbd_oracle driver which we'll soon be contributing to APR) > >At any rate, I've still got a problem on my hands, because > > t

Re: apr-util config, etc.

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 3:36:39 PM -0500 Chris Darroch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, understood, and sorry to recapitulate an old discussion. (Also apologies for the strange subject line -- too much proofreading of the body!) No need to apologize. I just wanted to indicate that we've thou

Re: apr-util config, etc.

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Darroch
Justin: >>My ultimate question, for the impatient, is whether adding >> -R to APRUTIL_LDFLAGS is an appropriate solution when using >> libraries that one expects not to have accompanying .la files. > > We've had this discussion several times. There's a group of developers who > believe we s

Re: [Fwd: Re: apr-util config, etc.]

2005-11-15 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On November 15, 2005 3:00:38 PM -0500 Chris Darroch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My ultimate question, for the impatient, is whether adding -R to APRUTIL_LDFLAGS is an appropriate solution when using libraries that one expects not to have accompanying .la files. We've had this discussion s

[Fwd: Re: apr-util config, etc.]

2005-11-15 Thread Chris Darroch
Hi -- I've encountered some issues with the apr-util build/configure system that I thought I might pass on for wiser minds than mine to review. The crux of the problem seems to be twofold. First, it's unclear to me what provision the apr-util build system has for libraries (such as commerc

RE: cross-process, named mutex

2005-11-15 Thread Daniel May
Neither apr_proc_mutex or apr_global_mutex seem to work under Linux. I created a simple single instance case where I created a named mutex in an test program and paused. I started a second instance and I was granted the mutex. The lock is not holding. Daniel -Original Message- From: