William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Portable Runtime
Project are proud to announce the General Availability of
version 1.3.2 of the APR Apache Portable Runtime library.
So what do folks think of adverting on the
As mentioned earlier, I am trying to install Apache 2.2.9
onto z/OS 1.9. Had some difficulties, seem to have solved.
However, a few questions...
I started with the page
http://people.apache.org/~trawick/apache-2-on-os390.html
which describes a process for installing Apache 2.0 onto
OS/390.
Steve Comstock wrote:
As mentioned earlier, I am trying to install Apache 2.2.9
onto z/OS 1.9. Had some difficulties, seem to have solved.
However, a few questions...
I started with the page
http://people.apache.org/~trawick/apache-2-on-os390.html
which describes a process for installing
Branko Čibej wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
As mentioned earlier, I am trying to install Apache 2.2.9
onto z/OS 1.9. Had some difficulties, seem to have solved.
However, a few questions...
I started with the page
http://people.apache.org/~trawick/apache-2-on-os390.html
which describes a
I'm not setup to regenerate the docs/ dir from xdocs atm, so this is
just xdocs --
This list is based on FreeBSD ports tree, and my previous employer
(Ticketmaster).
svn diff
Index: projects.xml
===
--- projects.xml
I'm attaching the patch which adds support for Berkeley DB 4.7.
apr-util-support-db-4.7.patch
Description: Binary data
So the configure seemed to go OK. Following the instructions,
I issue:
/usr/lpp/zApache/httpd-2.2.9 make
and the result, after three hours:
Making all in srclib
Making all in apr
.
.
.
WARNING CCN3068 ./dso/unix/dso.c:139 Operation between types void* and int
is not allowed.
WARNING
Steve Comstock wrote:
So two questions to the community:
1) What causes this?
missing prototypes
2) How do I fix it?
you can replace srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util with apr/apr-util 1.3.2
packages. Better yet, build and install apr/apr-util 1.3.2 first and
then point ./configure of httpd
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
So two questions to the community:
1) What causes this?
missing prototypes
2) How do I fix it?
you can replace srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util with apr/apr-util 1.3.2
packages. Better yet, build and install apr/apr-util 1.3.2 first and
So I go to
http://apr.apache.org/download.cgi
and download apr-1.3.2.tar.gz
But I'm confused:
1. Should I delete the srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util
directories I built just yesterday? Remember, the
configure took me over five hours to build what I
have (and it doesn't work)
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:45 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
1. Should I delete the srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util
directories I built just yesterday? Remember, the
configure took me over five hours to build what I
have (and it doesn't work)
You don't need to delete it, but
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 09:26 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Given that this runs for such a long time, it would
really be better to do it on the hardware, rather than an emulator.
Otherwise, it may take you weeks before you find out what's going on :-(
One more note here. If you would like to see
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:24 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
I'm attaching the patch which adds support for Berkeley DB 4.7.
Thank you. Committed to trunk and 1.3.x.
--
Bojan
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:16 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
This list is based on FreeBSD ports tree, and my previous employer
(Ticketmaster).
I'm pretty sure open source folks won't mind being linked from this APR
page, but are Ticketmaster OK with it?
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 14:45 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
1. Should I delete the srclib/apr and srclib/apr-util
directories I built just yesterday? Remember, the
configure took me over five hours to build what I
have (and it doesn't work)
You don't
Steve Comstock wrote:
but that's one reason I'm so pissed: apparently the version shipped
with httpd is not the correct version. This would never be tolerated
in the mainframe world.
I beg your pardon? What is the correct version? As I see from our
posts, you're for all practical purposes
Branko Čibej wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
but that's one reason I'm so pissed: apparently the version shipped
with httpd is not the correct version. This would never be tolerated
in the mainframe world.
I beg your pardon? What is the correct version? As I see from our
posts, you're for all
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 19:03 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
but that's one reason I'm so pissed: apparently the version shipped
with httpd is not the correct version. This would never be tolerated
in the mainframe world.
1.3.0 was the best version at the time of the httpd-2.2.9 release, so
httpd
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 19:41 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Why wasnt apr-1.3.2
included in the httpd-2.2.9 tarball, I guess is what I'm
asking.
Simply release timing, nothing else.
In fact, you'll find that many Linux and BSD distributions ship httpd
and APR/APU packages separately, so they can
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Steve Comstock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find it very surprising a bundled version of a
subsystem would not be a good fit for a platform, especially
if there is an appropriate fit available. Why wasnt apr-1.3.2
included in the httpd-2.2.9 tarball, I guess is
Steve Comstock wrote:
Why wasnt apr-1.3.2
included in the httpd-2.2.9 tarball, I guess is what I'm
asking.
If you look at the release dates, you'll see that 1.3.2 was released just
this Friday, mostly due to feedback from good users like yourself who
provide detailed information. httpd 2.2.9
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Steve Comstock wrote:
Why wasnt apr-1.3.2
included in the httpd-2.2.9 tarball, I guess is what I'm
asking.
If you look at the release dates, you'll see that 1.3.2 was released just
this Friday, mostly due to feedback from good users like yourself who
provide
Steve Comstock wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
Also the local utility refused to lay in the cable to power up my pet
PDP-10 ...
Ah, well, if you're going to call a PDP-10 a mainframe... :-)
I'm so sorry, I completely forgot TOPS-10 subsisted on a 6-bit ASCII
subset, no EBCDIC that I can
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 23:24 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
I can ask, I see no reason why not, its not like its a secret they use
ASF software.
That would be great, thanks.
--
Bojan
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:16 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
This list is based on FreeBSD ports tree, and my previous employer
(Ticketmaster).
I'm pretty sure open source folks won't mind being linked from this APR
page, but are Ticketmaster OK with it?
I can ask, I
Hey Craig,
Long time, do you have any objects to linking to ticketmaster here --
http://apr.apache.org/projects.html
Stas et al already linked to it long ago in
http://perl.apache.org
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL
26 matches
Mail list logo
