To tag apr 1.4.3/-util 1.3.11?

2011-04-08 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd. Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2 with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly on the tasks of rebuilding a VM to which I had lost the admin password (damn 'password constraints'). I would like to

Re: To tag apr 1.4.3/-util 1.3.11?

2011-04-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:02 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd. Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2 with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly on the tasks of rebuilding a VM to which

Re: To tag apr 1.4.3/-util 1.3.11?

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd. Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2 with Visual Studio 2010 - mostly on the tasks of rebuilding a VM to which I had lost the admin password

Re: To tag apr 1.4.3/-util 1.3.11?

2011-04-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd. Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday and today on 2008R2 with Visual Studio 2010 -

process.h

2011-04-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:29 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 4/8/2011 9:07 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 08.04.2011 08:02, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: Jeff, I've lost your thread, probably because it's half at httpd. Just so you know, I did get to spend my hours yesterday

Re: signal.h on Windows

2011-04-08 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 08.04.2011 17:29, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.: oh, and another bad thingy I found with APR on Windows is that ugly redefining of all the SIG* defines in apr_private.h - it simply doesnt work as it should, that means it only depends on the order of includes: if signal.h is included before

Re: process.h

2011-04-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Am 08.04.2011 17:45, schrieb Jeff Trawick: process.h has a cute history 1.4.x: APR_HAVE defined in apr.hw/apr.h.in; the include is performed in apr.hw if defined so apr.h.in needs to add the include if defined for