Re: MinGW status

2011-04-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > trunk: > > looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only > test failures are also broken with a Visual Foo build > > I build like this: > > # enable IPv6 export CPPFLAGS=-DIPV6_V6ONLY=27 ^ This is also required with Mi

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-04-11 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:14:00 -0400 Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> niq, is that to be exported eventually? No (since I still seem to owe you an answer - sorry). > how about changing the _ex to _internal? +1. I thought so more-or-less as soon as I'd committed. Didn't make the trivial change in case

MinGW status

2011-04-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
trunk: looks pretty good here other than the IPv6 detection; I think the only test failures are also broken with a Visual Foo build I build like this: # enable IPv6 export ac_cv_define_sockaddr_in6=yes export ac_cv_working_getaddrinfo=yes export ac_cv_working_getnameinfo=yes export ac_cv_func_ga

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-04-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 11.04.2011 21:14, schrieb Jeff Trawick: how about changing the _ex to _internal? sure, sounds better ... Gün.

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-04-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Jeff, Niq, > Am 30.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jeff Trawick: >> >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf  wrote: >>> >>> Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf: are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...

Re: svn commit: r1086790 - /apr/apr/trunk/xml/apr_xml_internal.h

2011-04-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Jeff, Niq, Am 30.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf: are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ... 1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then it should

Re: svn commit: r1086625 - in /apr/apr/branches: 1.3.x/include/apr.h.in 1.4.x/include/apr.h.in 1.5.x/include/apr.h.in

2011-04-11 Thread Guenter Knauf
Am 11.04.2011 19:33, schrieb Jeff Trawick: most of this commit helps in that way, but there's a tiny amount which diverges (more like trunk apr.hw than branches/* apr.hw)... I'll address that shortly with some additional sync; just don't be surprised ;) naaa ... :-) and sorry I didnt pay enough

Re: svn commit: r1086625 - in /apr/apr/branches: 1.3.x/include/apr.h.in 1.4.x/include/apr.h.in 1.5.x/include/apr.h.in

2011-04-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:25 AM, wrote: > Author: fuankg > Date: Tue Mar 29 15:25:00 2011 > New Revision: 1086625 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086625&view=rev > Log: > Backport Windows apr.h.in stuff from HEAD (r892148). the right way to go here for Windows gunk is to match apr.hw