On 11/12/2013 10:33 AM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 11/12/2013 10:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:00:18 -0800 (PST)
Arsen Chaloyan wrote:
Anyway, if it turns out the change has to be #ifdef-ed, which is most
likely, then testing _MSC_VER only is not enough or appropriate.
Pl
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:00:18 -0800 (PST)
Arsen Chaloyan wrote:
> Anyway, if it turns out the change has to be #ifdef-ed, which is most
> likely, then testing _MSC_VER only is not enough or appropriate.
> Please note, if one uses VS2013 (_MSC_VER == 1800), it doesn't
> necessarily mean that the Pla
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Subj sez it all.
>>
>> I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
>>
>
> I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
>
> Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x
Index: network_io/unix/sockaddr.c
===
--- network_io/unix/sockaddr.c (revision 1541061)
+++ network_io/unix/sockaddr.c (working copy)
@@ -672,6 +672,10 @@ APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_getnameinfo(char **h
char tmphostname[256];