Re: Link errors in apr_atomic with VS2013

2013-11-12 Thread Gregg Smith
On 11/12/2013 10:33 AM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 11/12/2013 10:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:00:18 -0800 (PST) Arsen Chaloyan wrote: Anyway, if it turns out the change has to be #ifdef-ed, which is most likely, then testing _MSC_VER only is not enough or appropriate. Pl

Re: Link errors in apr_atomic with VS2013

2013-11-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:00:18 -0800 (PST) Arsen Chaloyan wrote: > Anyway, if it turns out the change has to be #ifdef-ed, which is most > likely, then testing _MSC_VER only is not enough or appropriate. > Please note, if one uses VS2013 (_MSC_VER == 1800), it doesn't > necessarily mean that the Pla

Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?

2013-11-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Subj sez it all. >> >> I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one... >> > > I'm happy to take care of the RM work. > > Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x

[RFC] additional apr_getnameinfo error checking

2013-11-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
Index: network_io/unix/sockaddr.c === --- network_io/unix/sockaddr.c (revision 1541061) +++ network_io/unix/sockaddr.c (working copy) @@ -672,6 +672,10 @@ APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_getnameinfo(char **h char tmphostname[256];