On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 13.10.2010 18:54, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
After 3+ days:
2 binding votes in favor (need at least one more)
3 non-binding votes in favor
no votes opposed
+1 for NetWare
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
[+ 1] Release apr 0.9.19 as GA
Thanks...
After 6 days, we have 3 binding votes for release of apr 0.9.19 and
none opposed. There's still time for objections, as we don't have
apr-util 0.9.19 approved yet, and I'll move
Am 13.10.2010 18:54, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
After 3+ days:
2 binding votes in favor (need at least one more)
3 non-binding votes in favor
no votes opposed
+1 for NetWare as .18 already since non-configure build isnt affected by
expat whoes ... :-)
I
[+ 1] Release apr 0.9.19 as GA
Tested on linux and win32
Regards
--
^TM
Am 13.10.2010 05:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those
On 09.10.2010 16:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it would be great to wrap this up
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it
On 11.10.2010 07:29, Sander Temme wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of
Seems that our 0.9.18 build is looking in the wrong place. This is a
regression: -1.
Has anyone else tested with bundled Expat?
I had tested with explicit --with-expat=bundled, I am seeing when
there is no system expat (and configure discovers the bundled expat)
it has the extra /lib/
I had tested with explicit --with-expat=bundled,
s/bundled/builtin/ -- i didn't have the typo in my actual build
On 11.10.2010 15:59, Eric Covener wrote:
Seems that our 0.9.18 build is looking in the wrong place. This is a
regression: -1.
Has anyone else tested with bundled Expat?
I had tested with explicit --with-expat=bundled, I am seeing when
there is no system expat (and configure discovers the
It has in it: where? It is ncluded in the path APRUTIL_LDFLAGS, but those
are actually not really used (only for make check and even there it works
with the wrong path).
My make check fails with the implicit builtin expat, similar to
Sander's report (although his really was on link of aprutil
OK, big sorry: it breaks when doing the normal in-tree build, but not
when doing out of tree. I didn't expect the simpler case to break :(
Working on fixing.
Regards,
Rainer
On 11.10.2010 18:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, big sorry: it breaks when doing the normal in-tree build, but not
when doing out of tree. I didn't expect the simpler case to break :(
... and it only seems to break on some platforms, like e.g. Darwin. On
Linux and Solaris it builds without
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temme san...@temme.net wrote:
[-1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
traveling this week, but grabbed necessary items for re-roll when I
saw this; will await a conclusion and re-TR
Any chance you can try the following patch to configure:
@@ -23541,7 +23541,7 @@
expat_include_dir=$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib
expat_ldflags=-L$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib
expat_libs=-lexpat
- expat_libtool=$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib/libexpat.la
+
On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net wrote:
[-1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
traveling this week, but grabbed necessary items for re-roll when I
saw this; will await a conclusion
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net wrote:
[-1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
traveling this week,
On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Any chance you can try the following patch to configure:
Yes, that makes the issue go away. Configure, make, make install and make
check all work with that.
S.
@@ -23541,7 +23541,7 @@
expat_include_dir=$top_builddir/$bundled_subdir/lib
On 10/11/2010 12:28 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:25 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/11/2010 12:14 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.10.2010 18:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sander Temmesan...@temme.net wrote:
[-1] Release
On 11.10.2010 19:29, Sander Temme wrote:
On Oct 11, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Any chance you can try the following patch to configure:
Yes, that makes the issue go away. Configure, make, make install and make
check all work with that.
S.
@@ -23541,7 +23541,7 @@
So r1021428 should be fine. Anyone who can test apr-util 0.9.18 plus patch
on AIX before Jeff does a reoll?
+1
Went back to AIX and ran w/o --with-expat=builtin and got Sander's
make failure.
Overlayed apu-conf.m4 from 0.9.x HEAD and repeated build and it worked.
--
Eric Covener
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it
On 09.10.2010 16:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it would be great to wrap this up
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 09.10.2010 16:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get
On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it would be great to
Tarballs/zips are at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/. As there are
enclosed security fixes (already available separately) and wrowe wants
to roll httpd 2.0 soon-ish to get those delivered to the bulk of our
0.9.x users, it would be great to wrap this up within 48 hours.
(Comments on timing
+/-1
[+1] Release apr 0.9.19 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
We'll have cycles to let this go the full 72 hours, I expect to leave the
httpd votes open that long. Although there will be a .19/.18 based tag
of httpd today, I intend to withdraw and reroll 2.0 with fresh 0.9 tags
+/-1
[+1] Release apr 0.9.19 as GA
[+1] Release apr-util 0.9.18 as GA
(non-binding)
AIX 6.1/ xlc / 32,64 no regression (DSO failures only)
HP 11.23/ aCC / IA64 / no regression (DSO failures only)
HP 11.23 / aCC / PARISC / all tests pass
Ubuntu 10.04 / gcc / IA32 all tests pass
SLES11 /
30 matches
Mail list logo
