Hi,
Maybe the patch is required as an attachment? Here it is.
Can it be included in apr?
Regards,
Eric
--- apr.orig/poll/unix/select.c 2009-10-02 18:24:00.0 +0200
+++ apr/poll/unix/select.c 2011-07-07 14:55:29.0 +0200
@@ -149,6 +149,14 @@
break;
}
On 07/06/2011 03:58 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/06/2011 02:52 PM, Eric van der Maarel wrote:
Hi,
Recently I proposed a fix for the select version of apr_pollset_poll
implementation, that prevents cpu going to 100% when all clients have
disconnected
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr
On 07/06/2011 02:52 PM, Eric van der Maarel wrote:
Hi,
Recently I proposed a fix for the select version of apr_pollset_poll
implementation, that prevents cpu going to 100% when all clients have
disconnected
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201106.mbox/browser). It
actually prov
Hi,
Recently I proposed a fix for the select version of apr_pollset_poll
implementation, that prevents cpu going to 100% when all clients have
disconnected
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201106.mbox/browser).
It actually provides the select impl. of poll with the ability to is
On 05/29/2011 10:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
Can you outline the idioms you refer to that prefer a select()
implementation?
iow, how different are they from
apr_socket_create
set socket nonbloc
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
>> Can you outline the idioms you refer to that prefer a select()
>> implementation?
>>
>> iow, how different are they from
>>
>> apr_socket_create
>> set socket nonblocking with no timeout
>> apr
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, wrote:
> Can you outline the idioms you refer to that prefer a select()
> implementation?
>
> iow, how different are they from
>
> apr_socket_create
> set socket nonblocking with no timeout
> apr_socket_connect()
> apr_pollset_poll()
That's all serf is doing. Wi
On , Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this behavior? Anybody have any clever
> workarounds? -- justin
Using apr_pollset_create_ex() with APR_POLLSET_SELECT allows serf to
be happy on
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this behavior? Anybody have any clever
> workarounds? -- justin
Using apr_pollset_create_ex() with APR_POLLSET_SELECT allows serf to
be happy on Win32.
Besides connect() failing, there is at least one other failu
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> WSAPoll() is available with Vista/2008 Server and later. It should be
> used automatically by APR without rebuilding your code (via a run-time
> check for presence of the Windows API).
>
> As far as WSAPoll() and this issue... MS doc says
>
>
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Eric van der Maarel
wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 10:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Eric van der Maarel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Further investigation reveals a difference between running Tomcat on
>>> Linux and Windows. From the To
On 05/05/2011 10:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Eric van der Maarel
wrote:
Hi,
Further investigation reveals a difference between running Tomcat on
Linux and Windows. From the Tomcat Poller thread the apr_pollset_poll()
is called. When a client in the pollset has d
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Eric van der Maarel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Further investigation reveals a difference between running Tomcat on
> Linux and Windows. From the Tomcat Poller thread the apr_pollset_poll()
> is called. When a client in the pollset has disconnected, under Linux
> this call re
Hi,
Further investigation reveals a difference between running Tomcat on
Linux and Windows. From the Tomcat Poller thread the apr_pollset_poll()
is called. When a client in the pollset has disconnected, under Linux
this call returns (in the rtnevents member of the descriptors resultset)
49
Hi, I'm in a team with Richard.
We already noticed that Stefan Ruppert's original patch didn't do the
trick. We've also applied the other diffs from rev. 1089433, to no
avail. It seems we are not in the situation that 1089433 fixes. When we
encounter the problem, we never have num == 0 or poll
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the reply.
I will apply the patch and see if it solves our problem.
Regards,
Richard
On 28 apr. 2011, at 15:33, "Jeff Trawick" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Richard van der Laan
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We use GraniteDS and server push based on APR from Tomcat
On 4/28/2011 9:32 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> This is what you need, right? (sorry, in a rush at the moment)
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1089433
>
> IIRC, wrowe mentioned holding off this Windows change/fix/whatever to
> 1.5.x and doc it for 1.4.x. IMO it is okay to
On 04/28/2011 03:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Richard van der Laan
wrote:
Hi,
Anybody with a similar experience and/or solution?
This is what you need, right? (sorry, in a rush at the moment)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1089433
IIRC,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Richard van der Laan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We use GraniteDS and server push based on APR from Tomcat native 1.1.20 in
> JBoss-4.2.3.
> When we connect to the server with a client flex app which sets up the comet
> connection and then stop the client (e.g. stop the brows
Hi,
We use GraniteDS and server push based on APR from Tomcat native 1.1.20 in
JBoss-4.2.3.
When we connect to the server with a client flex app which sets up the comet
connection and then stop the client (e.g. stop the browser running the app)
the server's CPU utilization becomes 100%. This happe
20 matches
Mail list logo
