On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:14:00 -0400
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >> niq, is that to be exported eventually?
No (since I still seem to owe you an answer - sorry).
> how about changing the _ex to _internal?
+1.
I thought so more-or-less as soon as I'd committed.
Didn't make the trivial change in case
Am 11.04.2011 21:14, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
how about changing the _ex to _internal?
sure, sounds better ...
Gün.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Jeff, Niq,
> Am 30.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...
Jeff, Niq,
Am 30.03.2011 01:26, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...
1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then
it should
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>
>> are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...
>> 1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then
>> it should be moved to a public header
>> 2. if you look
Am 30.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
are you really sure this is the right thing? /me doubt ...
1. its in an internal header - if we want to expoert that function then
it should be moved to a public header
2. if you look into apr_xml.c you can find:
APR_DECLARE(apr_xml_parser *) apr_xml_pa
Hi Jeff,
Am 30.03.2011 00:29, schrieb traw...@apache.org:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 29 22:29:05 2011
New Revision: 1086790
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1086790&view=rev
Log:
fix linkage of apr_parser_create_ex() on Windows
Submitted by: Carlo Bramini
PR: tiny part of 4617
