Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-23 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 08 Sep 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> Enabling a particular crypto library by default would only be done if >> --with-crypto was requested. The global default (no crypto) wouldn't >> change. But if you enable the crypto featu

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-09 Thread Graham Leggett
On 08 Sep 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Enabling a particular crypto library by default would only be done if > --with-crypto was requested. The global default (no crypto) wouldn't > change. But if you enable the crypto feature you could avoid having > to specify a particular implement

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 8 Sep 2012, at 13:46, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >> Also, on platforms where OpenSSL is installed in a usual location, you only >> need >> >> --with-crypto --with-openssl >> >> Why does it work like this? APR-Util supports either NSS or Ope

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-08 Thread Graham Leggett
On 8 Sep 2012, at 13:46, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Also, on platforms where OpenSSL is installed in a usual location, you only > need > > --with-crypto --with-openssl > > Why does it work like this? APR-Util supports either NSS or OpenSSL > libraries (or presumably others in the future) and force

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > A) would you like a bugzilla? Not necessary... > > b) I agree about the default. I'll give folks a chance to comment about defaulting to OpenSSL before changing anything. > > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-08 Thread Benson Margulies
A) would you like a bugzilla? b) I agree about the default. On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Benson Margulies > wrote: > > I've explained it. Is the following a bug? > > > > Step 1: > > > > ./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-cry

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-08 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I've explained it. Is the following a bug? > > Step 1: > > ./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-crypto > > include/apu.h:#define APU_HAVE_CRYPTO0 > > Step 2: > > ./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-crypto --with-op

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-08 Thread Benson Margulies
I've explained it. Is the following a bug? Step 1: ./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-crypto include/apu.h:#define APU_HAVE_CRYPTO0 Step 2: ./configure --with-apr=/opt/apr-1.4.6 --with-crypto --with-openssl=/usr include/apu.h:#define APU_HAVE_CRYPTO1

Re: crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-07 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Thursday 06 September 2012, Benson Margulies wrote: > I'm trying to build httpd 2.4.3 on OSX Mountain Lion with > mod_session_crypto. > > I'm failing. I think that the reason is the following error from > the configure process for apr-util: > > > configure:36291: checking for crypt_r > config

crypt_r versus macosx

2012-09-05 Thread Benson Margulies
I'm trying to build httpd 2.4.3 on OSX Mountain Lion with mod_session_crypto. I'm failing. I think that the reason is the following error from the configure process for apr-util: configure:36291: checking for crypt_r configure:36291: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -DDARWIN -DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MAS