On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:43:54AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> jerenkrantz01/12/07 16:43:54
>
> Modified:.STATUS
> Log:
> Grumble, grumble. One problem fixed, another created.
...
> -* Try doing --with-dbm=db2 when you have db3 available. No go.
> - Justi
> +* add misc/version.c and related machinery once the pattern is
> + layed out in APR.
I know we have discussed the location before, but misc/ is a horrible
name, and I had a few people point it out to me at ApacheCon. So,
although it is the best I have, I would like to ask people
> wrowe 01/01/12 20:23:31
>
> Modified:.STATUS
> Log:
> Vote on some things so we get this out the door!
>
>RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
>
> +* This vote ends on Wednesday!
> + Source code layout needs to be decided for apr and apr-util. There
> +
--- Greg Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason that I asked for a bucket return value was so that we could split
> the brigade at point P3/4, and get a pointer to B4 back (the start of the
> copy). We split at point P6/7 and get P7 back (the bucket after the last to
> copy).
Oooohhh y
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 01:14:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> I'll buy this. I can see this being somewhat useful. Part of me thinks
> this should be implemented as a brigade_seek function. The calling code
> would then be responsible for calling ap_bucket_split and
> ap_brigade_spli
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'll buy this. I can see this being somewhat useful. Part of me thinks
> > this should be implemented as a brigade_seek function. The calling code
> > would then be responsible for calling ap_bucket_split and
> > ap_brigade_split, but I am not sure if I agree w
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll buy this. I can see this being somewhat useful. Part of me thinks
> this should be implemented as a brigade_seek function. The calling code
> would then be responsible for calling ap_bucket_split and
> ap_brigade_split, but I am not sure if I agree with that
> > Okay, so that wasn't the best example, since a compression or encoding
> > filter would
> > have to read the data to compress or encode it anyway. Bah. What I was
> > really
> > trying to get at was something more like the byterange filter. Why is it
> > that an
> > ap_brigade_split_offs
> > This is now apr-util, so it should be something generally useful outside of
> > the
> > server for other bucket brigade apps.
>
> +1.
>
> I'm going to go ahead with a patch to do as I proposed before (change from
> split_any
> to brigade_split and delete copy_any). We can debate it furthe
--- "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about a better example, a binary result filter from a known filetype.
> E.g. we
> have this .gif image that we know from the header we will play with a certain
> range of bytes in the body, so ap_brigate_split_offset forward to that par
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 09, 2000 12:52 PM
>
> > On the other hand, brigade_split_offset does seem useful to me. Consider a
> > filter
> > that does some sort of compression or encoding that requires the data to be
> > split
> > into blocks of a
> On the other hand, brigade_split_offset does seem useful to me. Consider a
> filter
> that does some sort of compression or encoding that requires the data to be
> split
> into blocks of a predetermined length, regardless of what's actually in those
> blocks.
Okay, so that wasn't the best exa
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> No, ap_bucket_copy_any should not be named ap_brigade_copy. The whole
> idea behind a copy_brigade function is inherently flawed.
I had sort of thought the same thing myself, but I figured I might as well ask
anyway.
> In order to be able to use the copy_any functi
> No sweat... I'll do this this afternoon. One question, though... should
> ap_bucket_copy_any() also change to ap_brigade_copy()? The same issues apply
> to it
> as apply to _split_any().
No, ap_bucket_copy_any should not be named ap_brigade_copy. The whole
idea behind a copy_brigade functio
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +* turn ap_bucket_split_any() into ap_brigade_split().
> + Message-ID: ???
> + Status: Greg +1
> + Note: awaiting code from Cliff Wooley for this
No sweat... I'll do this this afternoon. One question, though... should
ap_bucket_copy_any()
15 matches
Mail list logo
