Re: i18n codepage guidance needed

2011-04-13 Thread Branko Čibej
On 12.04.2011 21:37, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 4/12/2011 11:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. >> wrote: >>> I have one dev question for my apr_fnmatch() refactoring >>> >>> Today we lowercase the two characters (and don't support case-insensi

Re: i18n codepage guidance needed

2011-04-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/12/2011 2:46 PM, Bert Huijben wrote: > And Turkish has the same problem the other way around. (the German > example is not in the normal 7 bit ascii, while the Turkish 'I' is) Thanks! It might be OK in the end, since there is no possible upper/lower match. tolower(c)/toupper(c) should be ret

Re: i18n codepage guidance needed

2011-04-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/12/2011 11:56 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. > wrote: >> I have one dev question for my apr_fnmatch() refactoring >> >> Today we lowercase the two characters (and don't support case-insensitive >> range matches at all, I won't change this apr-s

Re: i18n codepage guidance needed

2011-04-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > I have one dev question for my apr_fnmatch() refactoring > > Today we lowercase the two characters (and don't support case-insensitive > range matches at all, I won't change this apr-specific quirk).  But IIRC > there are language with

i18n codepage guidance needed

2011-04-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
I have one dev question for my apr_fnmatch() refactoring Today we lowercase the two characters (and don't support case-insensitive range matches at all, I won't change this apr-specific quirk). But IIRC there are language with multiple lower case representations of the same upper case character,