On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for
Windows?
(I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script)
Actually, now they are.
On 10/2/2010 4:10 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:41 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for
Windows?
(I don't think those are the .zip files created
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 01.10.2010 04:44, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Gun - let's simply fix 1.3 and 1.5.x - tell me you are done - and I will
svn rm the
expat/ from 1.4 branch, cp it from the 1.5.x branch. but let's do
thatwith builds
Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for Windows?
(I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script)
On 10/1/2010 7:10 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Bill, are you able to prepare the apr-util 1.3.10 source packages for Windows?
(I don't think those are the .zip files created by the roll script)
Actually, now they are. The svn export --native-eol crlf works on any platform,
zip works on any
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
1.3.x branch looks good to me; I've had a trawl through bugzilla and
can't find any low-hanging fruit there either.
Regards, Joe
On 9/30/2010 11:05 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
1.3.x branch looks good to me; I've had a trawl through bugzilla and
can't find any
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 11:05 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
1.3.x branch
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 11:05 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any
On 9/30/2010 6:42 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Yep, looks like NetWare fixes for expat are in 1.5.x but not 1.3.x. I
will probably wait for Günter to say something on the status there.
That seems sensible, but the trees should be the same, probably applying
his patches to 1.3 would be sufficient
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:47 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 6:42 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Yep, looks like NetWare fixes for expat are in 1.5.x but not 1.3.x. I
will probably wait for Günter to say something on the status there.
That seems sensible, but the
Am 01.10.2010 02:51, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:47 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/30/2010 6:42 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Yep, looks like NetWare fixes for expat are in 1.5.x but not 1.3.x. I
will probably wait for Günter to say something on the
Am 01.10.2010 04:38, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Hmmm?
apr-util-1.4 isn't released. We are shipping this from
www.apache.org/dist/apr/ ???
I know, but if I now modify 1.4 apr then I can no longer build 1.4 apu
with any apr ...
Joe, cant you just also update 1.4 apu right now?
Gün.
On 9/30/2010 9:41 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 01.10.2010 04:38, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Hmmm?
apr-util-1.4 isn't released. We are shipping this from
www.apache.org/dist/apr/ ???
I know, but if I now modify 1.4 apr then I can no longer build 1.4 apu with
any apr ...
Joe, cant you
Am 01.10.2010 04:44, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Gun - let's simply fix 1.3 and 1.5.x - tell me you are done - and I will svn rm
the
expat/ from 1.4 branch, cp it from the 1.5.x branch. but let's do thatwith
builds
already fixed instead of patching 2x, ok?
I am done.
Gün.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:04:59PM -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/28/2010 10:22 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
I have been trying to
On 9/29/2010 3:11 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Bumping to a later 1.95.x+patches seems feasible actually, yeah, nice
idea. I'm going to try to get this done today; I'll probably break the
Win32 build (at least!) so help might be required!
And I'll unbreak Win32 this evening - thanks much, here's
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:10:07AM -0500, William Rowe wrote:
On 9/29/2010 3:11 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
Bumping to a later 1.95.x+patches seems feasible actually, yeah, nice
idea. I'm going to try to get this done today; I'll probably break the
Win32 build (at least!) so help might be
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 28 september 2010 13:05
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: intent to TR apr-util 1.3.10 sometime Thursday
any concerns about the timing
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
I have been trying to backport security fixes for CVE-2009-3720 and
CVE-2009-3560 to the bundled copy of expat but am getting nowhere.
On 9/28/2010 10:22 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 07:05:09AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
any concerns about the timing?
any additional fixes people would like to see in that release?
I have been trying to backport security fixes for CVE-2009-3720 and
CVE-2009-3560 to the
22 matches
Mail list logo
