On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 20:01, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 07.10.2010 01:36, schrieb Mike Meyer:
For the record - I'm against the change. RFC 2823 says the Reply-To
header is an originator field, and the list is *not* the originator of
the message.
the list *is* the originator
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 19:12, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 06.10.2010 21:40, schrieb Sander Temme:
Please make Reply-To default to the list. It's a discussion list,
with discussions taking place on-list. So responses should go to the
list.
ok, since we are 3 now who would
On 2010-10-07 at 04:55, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I think it is because people are tired
of the Reply-To discussion crap and are simply hoping not to have to
deal with it.
+1
Internet consensus is that there will be no consensus on this question.
Let's not waste time proving
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 20:01, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 07.10.2010 01:36, schrieb Mike Meyer:
For the record - I'm against the change. RFC 2823 says the Reply-To
header is an originator field, and the list is
The list already has a header with just the list address in it:
List-Post, as per RFC 2369. Adding another one is a waste.
Your mailer should have a reply facility that uses the List-Post
header. Put it in your UI, and start using it. Then you can quit
carrying whether or not the list uses
Two major consumers of apr are the httpd and svn projects. Many/most
of our subscribers are their subscribers. We know how httpd list
processing is configured... how is the svn dev@ list configured?
We do not munge Reply-To on dev@ or priv...@. I'm not subscribed to
users@, so I dunno.
Commit messages (which originate from the commit script) have a
Reply-To to redirect responses to the dev@ list, to keep discussion
off the commits@ list.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:44, William A. Rowe Jr.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:32, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Oh boo hoo, you can't reply to the list with just Reply. Get over it.
Hit reply to all and you'll be fine.
I just love it when people get all rude for no
... [query about svn lists]
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 17:29, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
We do not munge Reply-To on dev@ or priv...@. I'm not subscribed to
users@, so I dunno.
Commit messages (which originate from the commit script) have a
Reply-To to redirect responses to the dev@
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the list, so
if you just hit reply then post goes to list as it should be - why the heck
is that not true for the d...@apr list??
sure, I only need to take care of it, and hit
Am 06.10.2010 21:40, schrieb Sander Temme:
Please make Reply-To default to the list. It's a discussion list,
with discussions taking place on-list. So responses should go to the
list.
ok, since we are 3 now who would like to have it changed, and the rest
seems not to care about, how can we
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 01:12:28 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 06.10.2010 21:40, schrieb Sander Temme:
Please make Reply-To default to the list. It's a discussion list,
with discussions taking place on-list. So responses should go to the
list.
ok, since we are 3 now who
Am 07.10.2010 01:36, schrieb Mike Meyer:
For the record - I'm against the change. RFC 2823 says the Reply-To
header is an originator field, and the list is *not* the originator of
the message.
the list *is* the originator since it sends the mail to me, and not you
personally, so this is
Hi all,
with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the
list, so if you just hit reply then post goes to list as it should be -
why the heck is that not true for the d...@apr list??
sure, I only need to take care of it, and hit 'reply to list', but too
often I forget about
On 5 Oct 2010, at 23:46, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi all,
with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the list, so
if you just hit reply then post goes to list as it should be - why the heck
is that not true for the d...@apr list??
sure, I only need to take care of it, and
On 10/5/2010 5:46 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi all,
with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the list, so
if you just
hit reply then post goes to list as it should be - why the heck is that not
true for the
d...@apr list??
sure, I only need to take care of it, and
16 matches
Mail list logo
