Yeah, that could be one use case. In the end it's just an extra metadata
field that users can do with as they please. It's hard to think of one
mechanism that would work for all intents.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Avia Efrat wrote:
> First, I agree with both of you about not adding this cur
The support for satisfying a requirement according to a capability type was
just added as part of
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/commit/df2b916e624719e5f77e29c1e893c55f88e15862
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:30 PM, Tal Liron wrote:
> I think you are talking about requirements? Some of t
First, I agree with both of you about not adding this currently to the ARIA
core, as it is not certain that it is intended as a part of 1.0
As for I meant by backwards-compatibility, I'll try to give an example:
Suppose there is a cloud-provider database node type: cp.nodes.complexdb,
which corres
> On Aug 9, 2017:9:12 AM, at 9:12 AM, Tal Liron wrote:
>
> Why just to add functionality? (You should use inheritance in that case.) A
> new version of a type might as well also remove functionality, or really
> change everything as you said,
>
> In any case, TOSCA 1.0 doesn't tell us what to d
Why just to add functionality? (You should use inheritance in that case.) A
new version of a type might as well also remove functionality, or really
change everything as you said,
In any case, TOSCA 1.0 doesn't tell us what to do with versions, so at this
point we should indeed do nothing in ARIA
Currently, the support for substitution mapping is extremely limited. the
substitution_mapping section is parsed and validated, but nothing more.
However, supporting this feature (and hence, allowing for service
composition) is of high priority. Currently, we are at the the designing
phase - going
Actually, I can see the version field used as a backwards-compatibility
mechanism that will enable to keep the same node type, while adding
functionality. (maybe even modifying functionality, but that is more
complex).
In general, I agree that the 1.0 spec is not clear about using this version
fie