Re: Fwd: Re: Prototype for a new aries jpa impl

2015-04-07 Thread Giuseppe Gerla
Hi Christian I open a pull request with the first implementation. I also add 2 unit test. It seems an easy implementation. Wdyt? 2015-04-07 10:21 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider ch...@die-schneider.net: I am not yet sure how it would be implemented best. I guess you will have to experiment a

Re: Fwd: Re: Prototype for a new aries jpa impl

2015-04-07 Thread Christian Schneider
I am not yet sure how it would be implemented best. I guess you will have to experiment a bit. Why would ManagedEMF need to be a non static class? As far as I know non static classes are only possible as classes inside another class. Christian On 05.04.2015 11:44, Giuseppe Gerla wrote: Yes

Re: Fwd: Re: Prototype for a new aries jpa impl

2015-04-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi guys, Giuseppe, I like your first implementation. I gonna take a deeper look this afternoon. Regards JB On 04/07/2015 10:23 AM, Giuseppe Gerla wrote: Hi Christian I open a pull request with the first implementation. I also add 2 unit test. It seems an easy implementation. Wdyt?

[jira] [Created] (ARIES-1310) Use enumeration instead of String for transaction propagation type

2015-04-07 Thread Christian Schneider (JIRA)
Christian Schneider created ARIES-1310: -- Summary: Use enumeration instead of String for transaction propagation type Key: ARIES-1310 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1310

[jira] [Updated] (ARIES-1310) Use enumeration instead of String for transaction propagation type

2015-04-07 Thread Christian Schneider (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Schneider updated ARIES-1310: --- Component/s: Transaction Use enumeration instead of String for transaction

Re: Fwd: Re: Prototype for a new aries jpa impl

2015-04-07 Thread Giuseppe Gerla
Hi all I try to do some integration test deploying the new implementation with eclipselink and my test bundle. I make a change on the logic of PersistenceProvider service filter. To be abstract I don't want define the class of implementation in persistence.xml, so in this case I cannot filter