Congrats and welcome!!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 10:32 PM Vibhatha Abeykoon wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:07 AM Weston Pace wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:32 AM David Li wrote:
> > >
> > > Congrats & welcome, Yanghong!
> > >
> > > On Thu,
Congratulations!
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:07 AM Weston Pace wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:32 AM David Li wrote:
> >
> > Congrats & welcome, Yanghong!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, at 11:04, Daniël Heres wrote:
> > > Congratulations!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022,
+1 (non_binding).
Verified on M1 Mac. Thank you, Andrew.
On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 03:30, L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 12:14 PM QP Hou wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:16 AM Ashish wrote:
> >
> > > +1
My vote continues to be +1
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:44 AM Neal Richardson
wrote:
> +1
>
> Neal
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:15 PM Ashish wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:41 AM Gavin Ray wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, so that's what "non-binding" means in vote threads
> >
Congratulations!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 8:32 AM David Li wrote:
>
> Congrats & welcome, Yanghong!
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, at 11:04, Daniël Heres wrote:
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 17:02 Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> >> Congratulations, Yanghong!
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at
+1 to this proposal. It would be great to use the JSON type as a crash
dummy to work out the kinks in the process, but I think there are
meaningful benefits (Parquet round-tripping) to getting this work
under way.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:22 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Le 17/08/2022 à
+1 (binding)
Verified on M1 Mac.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 12:14 PM QP Hou wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:16 AM Ashish wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > validated on M1 Mac
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:03 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:16 AM Ashish wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> validated on M1 Mac
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:03 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Object
> > Store Implementation, version 0.5.0.
> >
> > This
+1
Neal
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 2:15 PM Ashish wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:41 AM Gavin Ray wrote:
>
> > Oh, so that's what "non-binding" means in vote threads
> > Those threads make a lot more sense now, thanks for the heads-up =)
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 12:31
+1 (non-binding)
validated on M1 Mac
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:03 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Object
> Store Implementation, version 0.5.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> dd58805b1c46691fcbe5b46412b2581ae3bd2a58 [1]
>
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:41 AM Gavin Ray wrote:
> Oh, so that's what "non-binding" means in vote threads
> Those threads make a lot more sense now, thanks for the heads-up =)
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 12:31 PM David Li wrote:
>
> > Non-binding votes are always welcome and
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Object
Store Implementation, version 0.5.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
dd58805b1c46691fcbe5b46412b2581ae3bd2a58 [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
The changelog is located at [3].
Please
Oh, so that's what "non-binding" means in vote threads
Those threads make a lot more sense now, thanks for the heads-up =)
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 12:31 PM David Li wrote:
> Non-binding votes are always welcome and encouraged! Was just trying to
> make sure we have the minimum 3 binding votes
Non-binding votes are always welcome and encouraged! Was just trying to make
sure we have the minimum 3 binding votes here but it turns out I can't count
and I make three.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, at 12:14, Gavin Ray wrote:
> If non-PMC can vote, I'll also give a huge +1
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at
hi Bill — you can unsubscribe by e-mailing dev-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 2:40 PM Bill Zhao wrote:
>
> unsubscribe
>
> Valentyn Kahamlyk 于2022年7月18日周一 16:56写道：
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm investigating the possibility of using Arrow Flight with graph
> > databases, and
Congratulations!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 18:09 Wes McKinney wrote:
> Congrats Weston!!
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 8:21 PM Krisztián Szűcs
> wrote:
> >
> > Congrats Weston!
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:41 AM Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Great news! Congratulations
If non-PMC can vote, I'll also give a huge +1
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 11:34 AM Matthew Topol
wrote:
> I'm not PMC but i'll give a +1 (non-binding) vote. I like the idea of
> integrating Substrait plans into Flight SQL if possible and it aligns
> with the arrow-adbc work.
>
> On Thu, Sep 8 2022
Congrats Weston!!
On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 8:21 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
>
> Congrats Weston!
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:41 AM Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi
> wrote:
> >
> > Great news! Congratulations Weston!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 1:42 PM Andy Grove wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats
Thanks all, I've updated the header with the proposed versioning scheme.
At this point I believe the core definitions are ready. (Note that I'm
explicitly punting on [1][2][3] here.) Absent further comments, I'd like to do
the following:
- Start a vote on mirroring adbc.h to arrow/format, as
I'm not PMC but i'll give a +1 (non-binding) vote. I like the idea of
integrating Substrait plans into Flight SQL if possible and it aligns
with the arrow-adbc work.
On Thu, Sep 8 2022 at 11:31:59 AM -0400, David Li
wrote:
My vote: +1 (binding)
Are any other PMC members available to take a
Congrats & welcome, Yanghong!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, at 11:04, Daniël Heres wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 17:02 Andy Grove wrote:
>
>> Congratulations, Yanghong!
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 5:03 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>>
>> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce
My vote: +1 (binding)
Are any other PMC members available to take a look?
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022, at 09:18, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Fair enough. For the record, my main concern with ad-hoc conventions
> such as "number of milliseconds expressed as an integer" is the poor
> usability and the
Congratulations!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022, 17:02 Andy Grove wrote:
> Congratulations, Yanghong!
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 5:03 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Yanghong Zhong
> > has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> > Arrow.
Congratulations, Yanghong!
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 5:03 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Yanghong Zhong
> has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> Andrew
>
This is a great discussion to have. Thank you for raising it.
We actually used to do fewer major releases and more minor releases (which
was done by backporting API compatible changes to an active_release
branch). However this took significant maintainer time (mostly my own, as I
recall), though
Hi,
Currently we have 2 major releases for arrow-rs and arrow-datafusion per
month. What then happens is that API breaking changes in Arrow will
necessarily require Datafusion to be modified ASAP for compatibility. Then
the changes in Datafusion will necessarily require Ballista to be modified.
I
On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Yanghong Zhong
has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
Andrew
27 matches
Mail list logo
