t; Regards,
> Raúl
>
> El sáb, 25 may 2024 a las 2:02, Jonathan Keane ()
> escribió:
> >
> > Over my time with the project I've had access to the github repository
> > ursacomputing/crossbow to be able to manually trigger crossbow jobs. I
> find
> > it in
Over my time with the project I've had access to the github repository
ursacomputing/crossbow to be able to manually trigger crossbow jobs. I find
it incredibly helpful when working on the extended R CI to be able to
iterate more quickly than waiting for the comment bot.
But also over the time
Congrats and welcome, Bryce.
-Jon
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:47 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Congratulations Bryce, and keep up the good work!
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
> Le 18/03/2024 à 03:21, Nic Crane a écrit :
> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Bryce Mecum has
> >
Thanks for this Nic.
And just to clarify: the latest here is the latest _release_ of Apache
Arrow with this new set up. Prior to this the build available on R-universe
were effectively dev builds (commits to main), but with this new tag,
R-universe will only have (or at least default to having)
Congratulations and welcome!
-Jon
;
> > Congratulations, Jonathan!
> >
> >
> > From: Dane Pitkin
> > Sent: Monday, October 16, 2023 11:52 AM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC member: Jonathan Keane
> >
>
>
> > [1] https://arrow.apache.org/docs/r/articles/developers/docker.html
> >
> > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 08:13, Divyansh Khatri <
> divyanshkhatri...@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > please see this and help me resolve the issue
> > &
+1
-Jon
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:26 PM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <
felipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:49 PM Dewey Dunnington
> wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 2:14 PM Matt Topol
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 1:05 PM
For development of the R package with docker containers, the link [1] that
Nic sent in this same thread is the place to go. In addition to that
docker-focused one, there are a handful of others that might prove useful
to you in getting your development environment setup [2].
If you run into any
+1
-Jon
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 3:54 AM Joris Van den Bossche <
jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 10:44, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > But I also reiterate my plea that these existing parsers get fixed so as
> > to entirely validate the
> I would understand this objection more if DuckDB hasn't been relying on
> being able to pass PyArrow expressions for 18 months now [1]. Unless, do
we
> just think this isn't widely used enough that we don't care?
This isn't a pro or a con of specifically adopting the PyArrow expression
+1, I'm very glad to see what will hopefully be a _slightly smoother_
experience for new contributors + issue reporters
-Jon
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 7:05 PM David Li wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022, at 20:01, Andy Grove wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 5:50 PM L. C. Hsieh
Congratulations! Your contributions to the project have been immeasurable.
-Jon
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:12 PM Vibhatha Abeykoon
wrote:
> Congrats Nic!
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 5:30 AM Ashish wrote:
>
> > Congrats !
> >
> > On Wednesday, October 26, 2022, Anja wrote:
> >
> > >
+1 (non binding)
-Jon
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:52 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão
wrote:
>
> Sorry, I got a bit confused on what we were voting on. Thank you for the
> clarification.
>
> +1
>
> Best,
> Jorge
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:53 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > Le 08/06/2022 à 20:55,
want to encourage
> database driver libraries to add new APIs that emit the Arrow C
> interface, we need to make it easier to generate the C interface
> without requiring a new library dependency.
>
> [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/gnz1kz2rj3rb8rh8qz7l0mv8lvzq254w
>
> On M
This isn't Java related directly, but for the R bindings we have to
support at least 10.13.6 to be on CRAN, so bumping up to 10.13 would
be fine for that too.
-Jon
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 9:24 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Sorry, I put "C++" in the title but this really affects Java via JNI.
>
Thanks for working on this. I've heard people asking about something
like this from a number of different fronts on top of the obvious use
case in geoarrow | other geospatial libraries. I think a minimal piece
of Arrow that other packages could depend on without needing to bring
in all of arrow
I too am +1 (nonbinding) to marking it as stable
-Jon
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 1:05 PM Neal Richardson
wrote:
> +1 from me too to mark it as stable. De facto it is stable: there have been
> no modifications to
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/c/abi.h since
> the
>
+0 most things validate, though I haven't been able to run the C++
tests successfully
Thank you for the huge effort Krisztián.
I verified the signature + checksums on [3].
I've run the following (on macOS 12.1):
The binary verification — successful.
I've also run the source verification on:
*
This doesn't address the large number of row groups ticket that was
raised, but for some visibility: there is some work to change the row
group sizing based on the size of data instead of a static number of
rows [1] as well as exposing a few more knobs to tune [2]
There is a bit of prior art in
Meeting notes:
# Participants
Nic
Weston
David
Eduardo
Benson
Rok
Antoine
Alenka
James
Matt
Micah
# 6.0.1 patch release
The RC1 for 6.0.1 is on its way and will have a vote shortly
# Flight SQL
David wanted to talk about Flight SQL from Dremio. We are close, would
like someone to
I am also +1 for all of the same reasons both Neal and Philip mention.
Lowering that barrier to participation for getting help + having that
information more easily findable will make it easiest for folks to use
and adopt Arrow. I will add personally I didn't realize I already do
this when working
+1
-Jon
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 2:26 PM Mauricio Vargas
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:18 PM Neal Richardson
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Neal
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:54 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:17 AM
Notes for the meeting, it was relatively short and sparsely attended
this fortnight:
Attendees:
* David Li
* Jonathan Keane
* Nic Crane
* Neal Richardson
Topics discussed
* Compute IR proposal: There's been some discussion, check it out
* CRAN resubmission, we have the fixes we need, will send
Hello everyone,
Our biweekly sync call is tomorrow (3 August) at 12:00 noon Eastern time.
For today's call, let's please us this Google Meet URL (different from the
usual one):
https://meet.google.com/vbq-yufg-zwr?authuser=0
All are welcome to join. Notes will be shared with the mailing list
Hello,
There is an emerging spec[1] for how to store geospatial data in Arrow
+ pass through parquet files in the geopandas world. There is even a
new R package that implements a wrapper to do the same in R[2]. These
both define a serialization[3] for storing geospatial data as an Arrow
table
+1
-Jon
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:30 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Eduardo Ponce wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM Joris Peeters
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Joris Van
rovide their opinion for the qualitative
> > metrics? What is a "good enough" coverage?
> > * How do we summarize the results into a binary decision: upgrade vs not
> > upgrade?
> > * ...
> >
> > In the end, it might not be worthwhile to go through
I've been digging a bit to try and put numbers on those users the Neal
mentions. Specifically, we know that requiring C++17 will mean that R
users on windows using versions of R before 4.0.0 will not be able to
compile/install arrow. Although R version 3.6 is no longer supported
by CRAN [1], many
Yes, I absolutely agree that more triaging, visibility, and info into
these would be massively helpful for tracking some of these down.
The conda-osx-py* builds seem to all be related to this LLVM mismatch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12738 which I've clarified
more on that ticket.
I also very much agree with all of the sentiments above.
One of the things that I'm hoping this new site/dashboard/whatever we
come up with will have is some more information / context around the
failures that hopefully will help make them less overwhelming and have
a higher signal to noise
Thanks for the comments + tickets Krisztián all of those sound like
good enhancements to this process.
On the point of:
>> Error type: Internal
> I find it really useful to categorize the errors, especially if we
> have an error out of our direct reach.
> I can't think of an easy way to automate
Yeah, piggybacking on what Weston said: is the line that we want to draw is
code point, combining character sequences, or graphemes [1]. IME, most
people would want/assume that combining characters would stay combined in
reversals (using Weston's example: "tréma" becoming "aḿert" (though this
+1 (non-binding)
Verified wheels, sources, and binaries on macOS 11.2 using the verification
script (except for Java Integration, Glib, and Ruby). Like Antoine I ran
into the same issue with Ruby.
I also installed Arrow and the R package locally + ran some adhoc tests
using some of our
be expected given
> > > the current status of jfrog) but I attempted to install the CentOS 7
> > > RPM and got the following error when I ran `sudo yum update` after
> > > installing the arrow repo rpm.
> > >
> > >
> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/cen
I'm still working on my verification, but as part of that noticed that
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12316 which we thought changed
the default memory allocator didn't fully accomplish that. Nothing is
broken per se, but jemalloc is still the default on macOS. I've made
I think this proposal is great and will help a lot when scanning
through Jira issues.
I wonder if it's possible to automate this? I'm thinking something
along the lines of: If it's a Type = Bug, could have a yes/no or
checkbox where we ask "is this a bug reproducible in the most recent
arrow
Thank you everyone who attended, here are the notes.
Attendees:
Jonathan Keane
Colin Alworth
David Sanders
Micah Kornfield
Rok Mihevc
Projjal Chanda
Eduardo Ponce
Krill Lykov
Discussion:
- 4.0 release
- zstd compression for the java library (has PR that is approved
I'm experiencing the same here.
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:06 AM Kirill Lykov
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know about the others but I cannot join because someone needs to
> let me in.
> Might be it the problem also for other people?
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:53 PM Neal Richardson <
>
Jonathan Keane created ARROW-8734:
-
Summary: [R] Compilation error on macOS
Key: ARROW-8734
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8734
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Bug
Jonathan Keane created ARROW-8726:
-
Summary: segfault with a mis-specified partition
Key: ARROW-8726
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8726
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type
41 matches
Mail list logo
