Re: [Discuss] Deprecating Plasma

+1 from the user´s side: my current team uses Arrow for daily tasks, and keeping unmaintained code is an invitation to break the package anytime On 2022-09-26 16:08, Wes McKinney wrote: +1 On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 11:59 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: +1 In "[Discuss] Deprecating Plasma" on

I need C++ tutoring

Hi! I'm looking for an instructor who can explain me how to correctly write a C++ function. I know some Rcpp and I need to translate a function to cpp11 (R). I have some funds to pay for tutoring. What I'm experiencing is described here:

Re: [VOTE] C++: switch to C++17

+1 On 2022-08-24 12:50, Weston Pace wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:24 AM Keith Kraus wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li wrote: +1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at

R package: Why using cpp11 instead of Rcpp?

Hi! Which was the practical reason to use cpp11 for the R package? I ask because now I'm in the process of creating a fork of fixest that uses cpp11 mostly due to license legal stuff, but I'm having major problems trying to "translate" this function

Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'

+1 On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La wrote: > Hello all, > > In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git< > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/> and GitHub< > https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name> >

Re: [DISCUSS] Annual rotation of Arrow PMC chair

I disappeared here in September, but yes +1 On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:45 PM Neal Richardson wrote: > +1 one to all of that. I enthusiastically endorse Kou, if he's interested! > > Neal > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 4:40 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > I second that -- thank you Wes for doing the

Re: [VOTE] Restart the Julia implementation with new repository and process

+1 On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:18 PM Neal Richardson wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Neal > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 6:54 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:17 AM Andy Grove > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Benjamin

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Nic Crane

CONGRATULATIONS !! THIS IS GREAT NEWS On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:40 PM Niranda Perera wrote: > Congrats Nic! :-) > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 12:17 PM Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi < > percy.camilo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Happy for you Nic, congrats! > > > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:06 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 5.0.0 - RC1

+1 I AGREE On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:04 AM Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 PM Matt Topol wrote: > > > > So, looking at the error message in the Go integration tests and looking > at > > the stack trace, I was able to confirm the bug. I'm not sure why it > showed > > up

Re: Accidental push to master

I think that a 2nd commit + push with the reverse shall be the best fix On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 12:41 AM Weston Pace wrote: > Well it did not take long for me to make a mistake. I accidentally > pushed a commit to master instead of my remote when creating a PR. > What is the best way to remedy

Re: [Discuss] If and how we should integrate geospatial data (specs) in Arrow

Dear Jon Thanks for sending this. Based on previous projects, WKB works well with SQLite, DuckDB and others, at the expense of creating heavier size columns compared to PostGIS. In order to experiment with, it can be interesting to use the CENSO 2017 shape files:

Re: Debian packaging for Arrow

This is a great idea, thanks a lot! Will you use PPA? Let me know to test these binaries On Fri, Jun 11, 2021, 5:27 AM Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi Arrow community! > > I am a Debian Developer looking to package Arrow officially in Debian as > a dependency for a specific tool I want to get into

Re: [NIGHTLY] Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-06-06-0

I agree with all the comments above. Some of those builds are "multiples" of each other, for example all the "manylinux2014" builds share the exact same problem. On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:57 AM Jonathan Keane wrote: > Yes, I absolutely agree that more triaging, visibility, and info into > these

Re: Moving automated nightly build e-mails to a separate mailing list

> Having a separate list sounds like a good idea to me. > > > Could we enable HTML emails on that list? > > > See jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-12822 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 10:12 AM Mauricio

Re: Moving automated nightly build e-mails to a separate mailing list

hi I agree with this, and being the person who has been digging into nightly errors, I can move this to a weekly email to builds@ On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 11:14 AM Wes McKinney wrote: > hi folks, > > In an effort to increase the signal-to-noise ratio on dev@, I suggest > that we move the

Nighty Builds Report

These include ‘Mirror sync in progress’ and other errors that shall be ignored: github-centos-8-amd64, github-debian-buster-amd64, github-ubuntu-bionic-amd64, github-ubuntu-focal-amd64, github-ubuntu-groovy-amd64, and github-ubuntu-hirsute-amd64. Best, Mauricio Vargas S. mavarga...@uc.cl

Re: Nightly Builds Repors 2021-05-17

18, 2021 at 8:16 AM Krisztián Szűcs > > wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Mauricio for collecting the issues! > > > > > > I'm placing a couple automatization ideas inline: > > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:32 AM Mauricio Varg

Nightly Builds Repors 2021-05-17

*NIGHTLY BUILDS REPORT* 2021-05-17 *New reported errors* *GitHub* *Build: *github-test-conda-python-3.8-spark-master Error type: Internal Progress: No work has yet been done on this issue. First time issued:

Re: Long title on github page

his project and want to find an end-to-end application, > > rather than a developer toolkit that they can use to build > > applications. Perhaps we should be more explicit and use > > "computational development toolkit" instead of "platform". > > > &

Re: Long title on github page

tion system > >>>>> > >>>>> Several others (Flink, Hadoop, ...) just have "[Mirror of] Apache > >> " > >>>>> as the description. > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 for Nate's suggestion "Apache Arrow is

Re: Long title on github page

best for description to limit mentions of specific > >>> features. There are some high level features mentioned in the > >>> description now ("computational libraries and zero-copy streaming > >>> messaging and interprocess communication"), but now in 2021 s

Re: Long title on github page

How about 'Apache Arrow is a cross-language development platform for in-memory data. It enables systems to process and transport data efficiently, providing a simple and fast library for partitioning of large tables'? Sorry the delay, long election day On Sun, May 16, 2021, 2:27 PM Nate

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Ian Cook

congratulations !!! On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 8:53 AM Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > Congrats Ian! > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:10 PM Ying Zhou wrote: > > > > Congrats Ian! > > > > > On Apr 28, 2021, at 7:01 PM, paddy horan > wrote: > > > > > > Congrats Ian! > > > > > > > > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jonathan Keane

congrats !! On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:47 AM Daniël Heres wrote: > Congrats! > > Op wo 28 apr. 2021 om 23:21 schreef David Li : > > > Congrats Jonathan! > > > > -David > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 16:55, Jorge Cardoso Leitão wrote: > > > Congratulations and thank you for your contributions

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 4.0.0 - RC3

+1 I've been using the development version for assignments and I had 0 problems On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:12 PM Ian Cook wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Verified C++ source on Windows 10 with only known failures[1] that > seem to be caused by using Visual Studio 2019. > > [1]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 4.0.0 - RC0

+1 On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache > Arrow version 4.0.0. This is a release consisting of 671 > resolved JIRA issues[1]. > > This release candidate is based on commit: >