There are a few interesting topics that I think would make a good sync up
in the sync document. For personal reasons I can no longer host such
meetings on Thursdays for a while but I would like to propose one for next
Wednesday March 20, 2022 at 15:00 UTC. Please see the document for more
details
I just missed the call, but I watched the recording (thank you to Andrew
for posting [1]). Really interesting!
I'm diving into Arrow because I have some previous experience with
in-memory query engines. I'm following discussions around improving
performance and adding features so I can determine
I am not sure if everyone saw it in the agenda[1], but we plan to have a
meeting tomorrow. I'll plan to record it for anyone who can not make this
time.
15:00 UTC Wednesday March 9, 2022
Meeting Location: (in agenda)
Matthew Turner: focused on JIT and row representation, next Wednesday,
March
Interested in learning more about this. Can work through the code and
discuss on 17 March either 4:00 or 16:00 UTC.
Benson
On 3/3/22 12:03 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk
through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as
I noticed that Matthew Turner added a note to the agenda[1] for a walk
through of the JIT code. I would be interested in this as well -- would
anyone plan to be on the call and discuss it?
I don't think I have time to prepare that content prior
Andrew
[1]
I don't see any discussion items for today, so I won't plan on any call
today. If anyone still wants to have a call please let me know
Andrew
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:23 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC;
> Please add items if
I don't see any items on the agenda[1] for tomorrow's sync at 16:00 UTC;
Please add items if there is anything you would like to discuss.
If there are no agenda items, we'll cancel the call and continue
asynchronously as always
Andrew
[1]
Minutes from the call today. Recording can also be found in agenda[2]
Attendees: Andrew Lamb, Rich, Paddy Horan
Discussed proposal for more frequent releases [1]
Discussed arrow / arrow2
Decided to postpone multi-threaded execution walk through until someone
with specific questions was on the
As a reminder, we plan to hold a Rust sync up tomorrow Thursday December 22
at 16:00 UTC
The zoom link and agenda are at [1] for anyone who wants to attend
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#heading=h.czuqfj486ufq
On Thu, Dec 9,
Hi Benson, sorry for the confusion, I intend to meet at 16:00 UTC (e.g.
11:00 AM EST) in about 4 hours time from now; I have updated the
agenda accordingly
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:47 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
>
> On 12/9/21 12:16 AM,
The slides are very helpful. Is the timing correct, 4 UTC?
On 12/9/21 12:16 AM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code
walkthrough with
I plan to do the biweekly call tomorrow
We are experimenting a bit with the agenda[1] for this one.
After discussing any other agenda items people want, I plan to do a code
walkthrough with Matthew Turner and we'll discuss various parts of the
DataFusion and Arrow codebases and see where the
Due to lack of agenda items [1] this week , I do not plan on holding the
call
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:57 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11
>
Cannot host at 4:00 UTC on 28 October, but can host at 4:00 UTC on 11
November.
Benson
On 10/27/21 1:02 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I
will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow.
Andrew
[1]
We have some proposed agenda items[1] for the Rust sync[1] this week so I
will plan to see anyone who is interested tomorrow.
Andrew
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit#
[2]
Hi Ben,
Anyone is welcome to join the party.
--QP
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:02 AM Ben Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or
> welcome to anyone?
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > I agree --
Hi,
I'm new to Arrow. Is such a call specific to a small group of people or
welcome to anyone?
Thanks,
Ben
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 9:17 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it
> (and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect)
I agree -- since no one has added anything to the agenda, I will cancel it
(and leave a note in the agenda document to that effect)
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 1:23 AM QP Hou wrote:
> I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
> the meeting starts. Changing to monthly
I recommend skipping the meeting if there is no proposed item before
the meeting starts. Changing to monthly cadence also sounds like a
good idea. We can always change it back to bi-weekly or call of ad-hoc
meetings if there are more items that need to be discussed.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:43
Tomorrow October 14 would be the next 16:00 Rust sync up.
However, we don't seem to have anything on the agenda[1]
Would anyone like to propose topics? Or shall we skip this time ? Maybe
monthly would be a better cadence?
Andrew
[1]
Thanks Andrew for facilitating this meeting and very happy to "meet"
everyone on the call. Hope you have a great day / evening.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
>
> Attendees:
> Andrew Lamb
> Shen Yi Jie
> Matt Turner
> Zied BF
> Remi Dettai
>
Notes from the 16:00 UTC Call:
Attendees:
Andrew Lamb
Shen Yi Jie
Matt Turner
Zied BF
Remi Dettai
Rich
Ruihang
Jaiyu Liu
QP
Jorn Horstmann
Benson Muite
Introductions (20 minutes)
Discussion Items (10 minutes):
* Interest in python binding, though it is lagging behind
* Thoughts on boundaries
Attendees:
Ruihang
Benson
Discussion items:
Self-introduction
OpenVidu seemed to work
Data Fusion introduction
Speed of Arrow development process and intended use cases
Maybe get time zones of attendees?
On 9/30/21 6:58 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
Join link:
Join link:
https://mkutano.nairuby.org/#/soft-amaranth-alpaca
Sorry it is late. Meeting should be short, as it seems there is a
preference for one meeting.
On 9/29/21 10:59 AM, Benson Muite wrote:
Hi,
Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC tomorrow.
Update the
I still plan on holding a sync up at 16:00 UTC for anyone who would like to
attend
Zoom Link: https://influxdata.zoom.us/j/94666921249
Pre-meeting Agenda:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1atCVnoff5SR4eM4Lwf2M1BBJTY6g3_HUNR6qswYJW_U/edit
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:11 PM QP Hou wrote:
> I
I would prefer alternating meeting time to optimize for more
attendance and reduce meeting fatigue for those who can attend both.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 1:00 AM Benson Muite wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Will send a link to a BigBlueButton/OpenVidu instance at 3:45 UTC tomorrow.
>
> Update the google doc
Thank you!
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:17 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing
> solution that should just work in the browser.
>
> Benson
>
>
> On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am
Can host 4:00 UTC, will likely use a self-hosted video conferencing
solution that should just work in the browser.
Benson
On 9/22/21 11:15 PM, Andrew Lamb wrote:
The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at
4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could
The idea of time variation sounds great. As I am not typically available at
4:00 UTC I would appreciate it if someone else could please arrange that.
Thus, I propose the following as an initial call and we can adjust
schedules or technology as needed:
Date/Time: Alternating Thursdays at 16:00 UTC
+1 on time variation. Please add me to to the invite.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 9:49 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00
> UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in
> joining convenience.
>
> On
New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00
UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in
joining convenience.
On 9/20/21 6:45 AM, QP Hou wrote:
16 UTC works for me too.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf wrote:
HI everyone,
16 UTC works for me too.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf wrote:
>
> HI everyone,
>
> Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related to
> internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help
> newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least
HI everyone,
Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related to
internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help
newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to
grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute.
I
I would also vote for 16:00 UTC.
Remi
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen wrote:
> 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D
>
> On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote:
> > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC)
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb
> wrote:
4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D
On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote:
> I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC)
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least
> > a few.
> >
> >
I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC)
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least
> a few.
>
> I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. Previously
> the schedule was every other
It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at least
a few.
I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. Previously
the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I
realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia.
I have received a lot of great help since I started working on DataFusion. It
will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with community members
"face to face".
Best,
Yijie
On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote:
> I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face"
I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to face"
and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any way I
can :)
--
QP
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai wrote:
>
> I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least
> occasionally.
>
>
I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least
occasionally.
I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more *informal
*discussions could help us understand each other better in our asynchronous
work (design documents, issues, PRs).
I also agree that no
A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we stopped the
Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the topic).
I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls
I think a call could be valuable to:
1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors
41 matches
Mail list logo
