Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-08-29 Thread Micah Kornfield
his automatically by creating a cloned > > > Git repository for test. > > > > > > It's better that we have a Web site to show generated pages. > > > We can create > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/tree/asf-site/nightly > > > and use it

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-08-01 Thread Wes McKinney
site for this? (arrow-nightly.ursalabs.org?) > > > > dev/release/post-04-rubygems.sh: > > > > We may be able to use GitHub Package Registry[2] to upload > > RubyGems. We can use "pre-release" package feature of > > https://rubygems.org/ but it's not s

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-08-01 Thread Andy Grove
e to use GitHub Package Registry[2] to upload > RubyGems. We can use "pre-release" package feature of > https://rubygems.org/ but it's not suitable for > nightly. It's for RC or beta release. > > [2] https://github.blog/2019-05-10-introducing-github-package-registry/ >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-31 Thread Sutou Kouhei
.sh: We may be able to use GitHub Package Registry[2] to upload NuGet packages. dev/release/post-07-rust.sh: I don't have any idea. But it must be ran automatically. It's always failed. I needed to run each command manually. dev/release/post-08-remove-rc.sh: We'll be able to skip th

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-31 Thread Wes McKinney
tashes. I > > > >> > > > don't have time to create pull requests for them > > > >> > > > yet. Because I postponed some tasks of my main > > > >> > > > business. I'll create pull requests after I finished the > > > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-31 Thread Andy Grove
ed the > > >> > > > postponed tasks of my main business.) > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks. I'll follow up on the 0.14.1/0.15.0 thread -- since we > need to > > >> > > release agai

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-31 Thread Wes McKinney
; > >> > > > >> > > Thanks. I'll follow up on the 0.14.1/0.15.0 thread -- since we need to > >> > > release again soon because of problems with 0.14.0 please let us know > >> > > what patches will be needed to make another release.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-27 Thread Micah Kornfield
oblems related to dev/release/ in our normal >> > > > development process, release process will be less painful. >> > > > >> > > > The biggest problem for 0.14.0 RC0 is java/pom.xml related: >> > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4717 >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-17 Thread Micah Kornfield
gt; > > > It was difficult for me because I don't have Java > > > > knowledge. Release manager needs help from many developers > > > > because release manager may not have knowledge of all > > > > supported languages. Apache Arrow supports 10 over > > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-13 Thread Wes McKinney
ge. Release manager needs help from many developers > > > because release manager may not have knowledge of all > > > supported languages. Apache Arrow supports 10 over > > > languages. > > > > > > > > > For Bintray API limit problem, we'll be able t

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-13 Thread Andy Grove
he Arrow supports 10 over > > languages. > > > > > > For Bintray API limit problem, we'll be able to resolve it. > > I was added to https://bintray.com/apache/ members: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18698 > > > > I'l

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-10 Thread Wes McKinney
bintray.com/apache/ members: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-18698 > > I'll be able to use Bintray API without limitation in the > future. Release managers should also request the same thing. > This is good, I will add myself. Other PMC members should also add

Re: [DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-07 Thread Sutou Kouhei
e. Release managers should also request the same thing. Thanks, -- kou In "[DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions" on Sat, 6 Jul 2019 16:28:50 -0500, Wes McKinney wrote: > hi folks, > > As a reminder, particularly since we have many new community member

[DISCUSS] Release cadence and release vote conventions

2019-07-06 Thread Wes McKinney
hi folks, As a reminder, particularly since we have many new community members (some of whom have never been involved with an ASF project before), releases are approved exclusively by the PMC and in general releases cannot be vetoed. In spite of that, we strive to make releases that have unanimous