Thank you Wes, I will keep that in mind for the next release. I also
noticed I was adding the result prefix incorrectly while I was going
through older results threads yesterday. I have since added a calling
votes section in our release procedure documentation to reflect this.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021
A couple of nitpicks with the result thread:
* I counted 4, not 3 binding votes
* the usual result subject line starts with “[RESULT][VOTE]” which makes
vote results easier to locate when searching.
Thank you for being the release manager!
On Sat, Aug 14, 2021 at 9:56 PM QP Hou wrote:
> The vo
The vote has passed with three +1 votes. Thank you to all who helped
with the release verification.
We have published new versions of datafusion and ballista to crates.io as well:
https://crates.io/crates/datafusion/5.0.0
https://crates.io/crates/ballista/0.5.0
https://crates.io/crates/ballista-c
+1 (bniding)
i verified the RC on aarch64-macos
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 at 23:29, Jorge Cardoso Leitão
wrote:
> +1
>
> Great work everyone!
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 22:19 Daniël Heres wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding). Looking good.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 07:49 QP Hou wrote:
> >
> > > G
+1
Great work everyone!
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 22:19 Daniël Heres wrote:
> +1 (non binding). Looking good.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 07:49 QP Hou wrote:
>
> > Good call Ruihang. I remember we used to have this toolchain file when
> > we were still in the main arrow repo. I will take a look i
+1 (non binding). Looking good.
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 07:49 QP Hou wrote:
> Good call Ruihang. I remember we used to have this toolchain file when
> we were still in the main arrow repo. I will take a look into that.
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:36 PM Wayne Xia wrote:
> >
> > Hi QP,
> >
> > W
Good call Ruihang. I remember we used to have this toolchain file when
we were still in the main arrow repo. I will take a look into that.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 5:36 PM Wayne Xia wrote:
>
> Hi QP,
>
> When running this script I noticed that this might be because I was not
> using a stable toolc
Hi QP,
When running this script I noticed that this might be because I was not
using a stable toolchain when testing.
Those failures occur with nightly (which is my default toolchain). And
everything works fine after switching to stable 1.54.
So I think it's ok from my side to vote +1.
BTW, I thi
Hi Ruihang,
Thanks for helping with the validation. It would certainly be helpful
if you could share the error log with me.
I have also prepared an updated version of the verification script at
https://github.com/houqp/arrow-datafusion/blob/qp_release/dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh.
This
+1 (binding)
Verification process:
- Checked shasum
- Ran cargo test --all
- Ran Ballista integration tests
- Manually verified Cargo.toml dependencies for Ballista
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:20 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I verified the signature, checked shasums and ran `cargo t
Thanks, QP!
I verified the signature and checked shasum, but got 3 failed case while
testing:
- execution_plans::shuffle_writer::tests::test
- execution_plans::shuffle_writer::tests::test_partitioned
- physical_plan::repartition::tests::repartition_with_dropping_output_stream
I set up env `ARROW
+1 (binding)
I verified the signature, checked shasums and ran `cargo test --all`
Andrew
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 2:03 AM QP Hou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Datafusion
> Implementation,
> version 5.0.0.
>
> RC3 fixed a cargo publish issue discovered in R
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Datafusion Implementation,
version 5.0.0.
RC3 fixed a cargo publish issue discovered in RC1.
This release candidate is based on commit:
deb929369c9aaba728ae0c2c49dcd05bfecc8bf8 [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]
13 matches
Mail list logo
