[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-02 Thread Wes McKinney
Hello all, I'd like to propose the 2nd release candidate (rc1) of Apache Arrow version 0.3.0. It covers a total of 263 resolved JIRAs [1] Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. The source release rc1 is hosted at [2]. This release candidate is based on commit d8db8f8a11a6c45645b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-02 Thread Wes McKinney
Addition to the list of checks: my C++/Python builds on Linux included building parquet-cpp master against the Arrow 0.3-rc1 tarball and building/testing the Python-Parquet adapter On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to propose the 2nd release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-02 Thread Bryan Cutler
+1 (non-binding) * Build Java with OpenJDK version "1.8.0_121" and ran unit tests * Build C++ and Python with gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) and ran unit tests for both * Ran Integration tests * Tested with SPARK-13534 On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Wes McKinney wrot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-03 Thread Uwe L. Korn
+1 (binding) I did check the following: - Build and tested C++ on Linux and macOS - Build and tested Java on Linux and macOS - Build and tested Python Linux and macOS with pandas 0.19 and pandas 0.20. (This failed for Pandas 0.18: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-944 but I don't think t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-03 Thread Gang(Gary) Wang
+1 (non-binding) LGTM, wonder why still rc1 ? Thanks. Gary On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to propose the 2nd release candidate (rc1) of Apache Arrow version > 0.3.0. It covers a total of 263 resolved JIRAs [1] Thanks to everyone who > contributed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-03 Thread Uwe L. Korn
It's rc1 because we started with rc0. 0-indexing ;) On Wed, May 3, 2017, at 06:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > +1 (non-binding) LGTM, wonder why still rc1 ? Thanks. > > Gary > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Wes McKinney wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I'd like to propose the 2nd release ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-03 Thread Gary Wong
Oh, Got it, Thank you for the clarification. :) On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Uwe L. Korn wrote: > It's rc1 because we started with rc0. 0-indexing ;) > > > On Wed, May 3, 2017, at 06:00 PM, Gang(Gary) Wang wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) LGTM, wonder why still rc1 ? Thanks. > > > > Gary > > > > O

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-03 Thread Julien Le Dem
+1 (binding) I ran the following: - verified signature - Build and tested C++ on macOS - Build and tested Java on macOS On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Gary Wong wrote: > Oh, Got it, Thank you for the clarification. :) > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Uwe L. Korn wrote: > > > It's rc1 beca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-05 Thread Wes McKinney
hi folks, With 3 binding +1 votes, 2 non-binding +1 votes, and no +0 or -1 votes, the vote passes. Since it's Friday afternoon on the East Coast, I will wait until Monday morning to send the release announcements and update the website. In the meantime, we need to: * Upload source artifacts to S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.3.0 - rc1

2017-05-06 Thread Uwe L. Korn
Hi all, I will also take care of uploading pyarrow 0.3 to https://pypi.org/ once parquet-cpp 1.1.0 is released. conda-forge packages are released for macOS and Linux, the Windows build is sadly broken but I hopefully found the problem without actually having access to Windows. Cheers, Uwe On Sa