Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2016-01-09 Thread Jake Farrell
+1 -Jake On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb > packaging for > Apache Aurora 0.11.0. > > > http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.11.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/ > > The Aurora

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2016-01-08 Thread Bill Farner
Folks, I respectfully ask that we keep this thread on the topic of the vote at hand. PMC members - please vote. We need to make progress and release packages for our latest release. On Friday, January 8, 2016, Jake Farrell wrote: > I pushed the api bindings for 0.8 to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2016-01-08 Thread Matthias Bach
Hi, Am 27.12.2015 um 00:21 schrieb ben...@gmail.com: > I've been producing a set of Mesos debs that are not derived from the > Mesosphere packages, with the goal of having a set of debs that follow > Debian conventions and packaging policies as closely as I can get them. Great work. This are far

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2016-01-08 Thread Jake Farrell
I pushed the api bindings for 0.8 to repository.a.o [1] after a one off vote for that specific binary artifact, but we never incorporated that as part of our official release process. we need to look into making the convenience binaries (deb, rpm, jar) easier to package and assemble for a vote at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2016-01-06 Thread Bill Farner
I'll be posting the requested change for the dependency issue. As it stands, we don't have enough binding votes for this release. Anyone with a binding vote - i'd greatly appreciate your participation. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Mauricio Garavaglia < mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-28 Thread Mauricio Garavaglia
+1 non-binding, with the amended "Installing Mesos" section in the install guide. On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 12:19 PM, John Sirois wrote: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > > > +1 to proposing this on the mesos dev list! > > > > +1 -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-28 Thread John Sirois
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Bill Farner wrote: > +1 to proposing this on the mesos dev list! > +1 - it would be wonderful to have mesos support deb (and rpm) directly as part of its release process. > > On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 3:21 PM, ben...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-27 Thread Bill Farner
+1 to proposing this on the mesos dev list! On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 3:21 PM, ben...@gmail.com wrote: > I've been producing a set of Mesos debs that are not derived from the > Mesosphere packages, with the goal of having a set of debs that follow > Debian conventions and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-26 Thread ben...@gmail.com
I've been producing a set of Mesos debs that are not derived from the Mesosphere packages, with the goal of having a set of debs that follow Debian conventions and packaging policies as closely as I can get them. For instance, rather than a single mesos.deb containing everything, there are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-23 Thread Bill Farner
Note that i've lengthened this vote to accommodate the holidays. Please consider verifying these debs using the recently-added install guide: https://github.com/apache/aurora/blob/master/docs/installing.md On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Bill Farner wrote: > I propose that

[VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-23 Thread Bill Farner
I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb packaging for Apache Aurora 0.11.0. http://people.apache.org/~wfarner/aurora/distributions/0.11.0/deb/ubuntu-trusty/ The Aurora deb packaging includes the following: --- The CHANGELOG is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Aurora 0.11.0 debs

2015-12-23 Thread Zameer Manji
John, I think you you have found a bug either in the installation guide or in our packages. We can either amend the "Installing Mesos" section to include installing this package or we can fix our packages to list this dependency. I'm not sure on how packages should behave, so I am not sure on