Re: Unified Python Support

Yeah we should have a release; we are overdue. On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 06:32 Michael A. Smith wrote: > I'd suggest that we do at least one release that has support for both > python 2 and 3 in the same codebase. This may open doors for folks trying > to transition from both avro-python3 (lang/py3)

[REPORT] Board report for Apache Avro Jan 2020

Hi folks! Here's the report for the quarter I submitted. Let me know if there are any last minute changes y'all would like to see. ## Description: Apache Avro is a data serialization system with a compact binary format. It is used for storing and transporting schema driven serialized data. T

Re: Including "fastavro" in release 1.9.2

unless the RM has an objection based on where they are in the RC creation process, I say go for it. (and if there is such an issue then let's get it ready for 1.9.3) On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:29 AM Ryan Skraba wrote: > > Hello! There's a long standing PR[1][2] that provides an impressive > perf

Re: [DISCUSS] version numbers and where changes should land

g > > > > > > > > > > > > Op wo 11 sep. 2019 om 18:17 schreef Ryan Blue > >: > > > > > > > > What would it look like if we *did* have to make an incompatible data > > > > format change after adopting "conventional"

Re: [DISCUSS] version numbers and where changes should land

in favor of switching to 10.x (dropping the 1. in front of > it). What's the added value in this? I'm just afraid of changing this, > would confuse a lot of downstream users. > > Also, a similar discussion was on the Spark devlist, I think Michael has > some valid points

[REPORT] Board report for Apache Avro Apr 2020

Hi folks! Here's the report for the quarter I submitted. Let me know if there are any last minute changes y'all would like to see. ## Description: Apache Avro is a data serialization system with a compact binary format. It is used for storing and transporting schema driven serialized data. T

Re: [REPORT] Board report for Apache Avro Apr 2020

7;m new to Apache Avro project. Is there > any guideline for how to become a member of Apache Avro? > > Thanks & be strong! > > On 2020/04/09 05:12:16, Sean Busbey wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > Here's the report for the quarter I submitted. Let me know

Re: Community governance

If we'd like an alternative to the dev@avro mailing list, there is a growing amount of infra support for using slack. in particular there is a bot for making sure you can send stuff to a mailing list for those who want a record. Andy, what kind of response would you see as proper? Is your concern

Re: [DISCUSS] Create a new mailing list for github notifications

I'd like a issues@avro or notifications@avro that has the detailed messages from Github and Jira. Great suggestion. I would prefer PR and jira issue creation / closure still go to the dev list, but I don't feel strongly about it since I will probably subscribe to both lists. On Thu, May 7, 2020

Re: [DISCUSS] Spec change for numeric defaults in schema JSON.

Sounds like a reasonable spec change. I think this would be our first breaking spec change? does that mean this is the time for us to hash out versioning the spec, or are we going to update all of our versions to 2.x? Can we get an idea on failure expectations for the SDKs we maintain? On Wed, Ju

Re: Namespace validation/requirements

> > I'm happy to make PR clarifying this. I'm a little bit concerned that if > validation doesn't exist in Java (and maybe other languages today) if we > make the spec stricter it could break users. How has the community handled > issues like this in the past? Something similar happened for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC2

+1 binding I think the nexus link was wrong. It was just the avro:avro jar for 1.10. looking at nexus I believe the staged repo for just his RC is this: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-1028/ I based my voting on the provided dist RC and this staged repo. * sign

[REPORT] Board report for Apache Avro June 2020

Hi folks! Here's the report for the quarter I submitted. Let me know if there are any last minute changes y'all would like to see. ## Description: Apache Avro is a data serialization system with a compact binary format. It is used for storing and transporting schema driven serialized data.

ASF policy check on CPAN published artifacts

Hi folks, At the board meeting this morning a question was raised asking if our CPAN published artifacts meet release guidance. Can anyone point me to what, if any, stuff we have for pushing things out to CPAN after a release? Like a guide or automated tooling or whatever?

[Announce] Please welcome Ryan Skraba to the Apache Avro PMC

Hi folks! On behalf of the Apache Avro PMC I am pleased to announce that Ryan Skraba has accepted our invitation to become a PMC member. We appreciate Ryan stepping up to take more responsibility in the project. Please join me in welcoming Ryan to the Avro PMC! As a reminder, if anyone would lik

[REPORT] Board report for Apache Avro Oct 2020

Hi folks! Here's the report for the quarter I submitted. Let me know if there are any last minute changes y'all would like to see. ## Description: Apache Avro is a data serialization system with a compact binary format. It is used for storing and transporting schema driven serialized data.

[DISCUSS] release candidates for 1.10.1 and 1.11.0

Hi folks! It's been a while since our last release. We've had some nice stuff land and we should get those contributions into releases so they are more widely available. Is there anything that I should consider a blocker on a 1.10.1 minor release off of branch-1.10? How about our next major rele

Re: Discuss regarding upcoming 1.7.8 release for Apache Avro

It would be useful to do a check of what's currently tagged in JIRA as being in 1.7 but isn't actually in git. I think I have stuff somewhere for doing this check, let me dig it out. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Suraj Acharya wrote: > Hi Community, > > I am wrapping up the license issue with

Re: Moving to jdk7 or jdk8

if we're talking about for the 1.9 release line, then I'm +1 on jumping to jdk8. I would prefer not to change the supported jdk version(s) for existing minor release lines. I don't think we should change the Hadoop version. On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 for moving. I'm

Re: Moving to jdk7 or jdk8

shouldn't move 1.8 or 1.7. >> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: >> >> > if we're talking about for the 1.9 release line, then I'm +1 on >> > jumping to jdk8. I would prefer not to change the supported jdk >> > versio

Re: Discuss regarding upcoming 1.7.8 release for Apache Avro

you able to find the script which will help with this? > I think all required changes have been completed and merged on branch-1.7. > > Suraj Acharya > > -Suraj Acharya > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > It would be useful to do a check of what&#

Re: Drop hadoop1 support in Avro 1.9

+1 sounds great. We can let user@avro know about the plan once we have the change in place, so there's still time if someone has a compelling reason staying on Avro 1.7 or 1.8 can't work for hadoop1 folks. On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Gabor Szadovszky wrote: > Hi All, > > It has already app

Re: Drop hadoop1 support in Avro 1.9

rg/jira/browse/AVRO-2059> to track it. > > I can do it for java but I guess, we have to do some update in the other > > languages as well. Shall I create subtasks for all the langs? > > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Sean Busbey > wrote: > > > >

Re: Discuss regarding upcoming 1.7.8 release for Apache Avro

AVRO-1719 > > AVRO-1683 > > AVRO-1656 > > > I will do that. And then use that as the base for the release. > > > > Suraj > > -Suraj Acharya > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Unfortunately I don't have it as a

[VOTE] Convert to gitbox

Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could start making use of pull requests. In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar to start is convert our repo to use gitbox. this means the writeable repository will be on github and some committer

Re: [VOTE] Convert to gitbox

+1 On 2017-08-29 11:29, "Sean Busbey" wrote: > Way back in May we had consensus[1] on using gitbox so that we could start > making use of pull requests. > > In the subsequent JIRAs to implement, it became clear that the entry bar to > start is convert our repo to u

Re: Ruby encoding performance

I'd love to get this change pushed in. If someone can spend some time reviewing and confirming perf changes that'll speed up my ability to merge it. On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Tim Perkins wrote: > A few months ago, I submitted a patch for Ruby encoding apache/avro#230 >

Re: Avro schema resolution

What's the rationale for not allowing it at all? Given that it's been in the spec so long I'm hesitant to remove it. I can't think of a time that we did a breaking change to the spec. Even if we check all of our implementations, there's no way to know if someone else has already created an impleme

[ANNOUNCE] new committer Nándor Kollár

Hi Folks! I'm very pleased to announce that Nándor Kollár has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache Avro project. Please join me in congratulating Nándor on this recognition of his great work thus far in our community! -busbey

Re: Licensing problem (LGPL in codebase!!)

Have these files made it into a release? On Dec 13, 2017 10:18, "Niels Basjes" wrote: > Zoltan, > > Because the copyright notice now says you own it I guess the best way to > approach this is is when you put up a pull request with all those files > files having a new license header. > That way i

Re: Licensing problem (LGPL in codebase!!)

In addition to Zoltan we'll need to confirm anyone else who has modified the files. On Dec 13, 2017 11:46, "Sean Busbey" wrote: > Have these files made it into a release? > > On Dec 13, 2017 10:18, "Niels Basjes" wrote: > >> Zoltan, >> >

Re: Licensing problem (LGPL in codebase!!)

gt; > > commit 9132015450a2ad6f56cd582b393e8f1b8df573c9 >> > >> Author: Thiruvalluvan M G >> > >> AuthorDate: Sun Apr 30 21:02:02 2017 +0530 >> > >> Commit: Thiruvalluvan M G >> > >> CommitDate: Sun Apr 30 23:31:29 2017 +0530 >

Re: Avro PHP lib

Hi Neal! That looks great. I'd say the big steps will be: 1) start a thread with a merge discussion. the subject line should look something like "[DISCUSS] code donation for php library" you should make clear in that thread if you think we ought to merge in your changes with the existing library

Re: Website to include current-event banner

Hi Roy! Please provide a patch on a JIRA issue and we'll take a look. Thanks for your interest. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Roy Lenferink wrote: > Hi all, > > I came to the Apache Avro project to update the website to add a banner for > the latest apache events. > This is as a follow up f

Re: Website to include current-event banner

ache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2171 > > 2018-04-17 21:26 GMT+01:00 Sean Busbey : > > > Hi Roy! > > > > Please provide a patch on a JIRA issue and we'll take a look. > > > > Thanks for your interest. > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Roy Lenfe

[DISCUSS] tech debt in our the website

Hi Folks! Today I tried to work through some helpful contributions to our website[1], and I ran smack into some pretty severe tech debt for our web presence. For starters, none of our documentation talks about how to build / deploy or contribute to the website. That's pretty bad. What's worse,

Re: Giving credit for contributions through Github Pull Requests

how about we create a PMC-controlled jira account to represent "pull request from someone without a jira ID"? then we can follow your suggestion of "encourage the contributor to create a jira id and assign to them" and we have a clear way to mark "you need to look at git or github to find the autho

Re: Giving credit for contributions through Github Pull Requests

butors, as compared with Jira: > > https://s.apache.org/mgf9 > > Thoughts? > > Doug > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 4:53 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > > > how about we create a PMC-controlled jira account to represent "pull > > request from someone without

Re: Giving credit for contributions through Github Pull Requests

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > So I guess this would be easier if we also said that contributions would > only now be accepted via pull request. Is that too onerous? Instead of > requiring everyone to have an Apache Jira account we require them to have a > GitHub account

Re: Giving credit for contributions through Github Pull Requests

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Maybe we should loosen the permissions on Avro's Jira so that any user can > assign an issue? That would make things a bit simpler. I doubt we'd see > much if any abuse. > locking down issue assigning happened ASF jira wide due to spammer a

Re: Who is the C# project leader?

This guidance on PRs helps tremendously, thanks! Do Brian and Milkenko agree that PR #307 supersedes PR #299 and PR #261? I ask because both are still open. I don't think there is currently someone acting as lead for C# / dotnet. Would one more of y'all be interested in acting in that role? I'm

Re: Who is the C# project leader?

losed PR #299 to reduce the confusion. > > > > > > I am willing to act as the lead, or help with maintenance/management, > of > > > the C# project. I've been making updates and releases of the C# part of > > the > > > project on my own for

Re: Revive Avro?

speaking of precommit builds, if someone wants to pick up and drive AVRO-1887 ("set up precommit checks via Apache Yetus") to completion, that would greatly ease the burden of testing out contributions. AFAICT the PMC is open to big shifts here, we're just bandwidth limited for things that aren't

Re: Jenkins

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 6:54 AM Niels Basjes wrote: > > > have a build matrix ... Java 10 and 11. ... easier to configure in, ... > > Travis ... native support. > > This is exactly why I asked about the preference for Jenkins. > Listening to these arguments I would tend to go to Travis as it > i

Re: Jenkins

//github.com/apache/avro/pull/344> to configure the precommit task > to run CI jobs, as Sean Busbey initially suggested. Initially I would like > to go for a Travis CI, as we have with Apache Airflow, but I think the Jenkins > of Apache itself <https://builds.apache.org/> might

[ANNOUNCE] New committer Daniel Kulp

Hi Folks! I'm very pleased to announce that Daniel Kulp has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache Avro project. Please join me in congratulating Daniel on this recognition of his great work thus far in our community!

[ANNOUNCE] New committer Ismaël Mejía

Hi Folks! I'm very pleased to announce that Ismaël Mejía has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache Avro project. Please join me in congratulating Ismaël on this recognition of their great work thus far in our community!

Re: C++ version for 1.9

1.9 is a major version change, so long as we release note the incompatible change this should be fine. Especially if the folks doing hte day-to-day maintenance of the C++ code want a newer standard. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:04 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > I’ve updated and merged the PR for moving

Re: Radical idea for 1.9.0

In the future please use "[DISCUSS]" at the start of your subject line for these kinds of proposals. that'll get more folks to see the discussion, e.g. when they filter this list. as a point of clarification, 1.9.0 is a major version change for the Avro project. the "1" is a file format version. t

[DISCUSS] what's the plan for releases?

Hi folks! First, I want to give a big thanks to everyone who's been slogging through the backlog of changes over the last few months. It's really exciting to see progress again. What are folks thinking about in terms of releases? I'm particularly interested in what the currently active contrib

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Avro works now with Java 11 too

Is this in a release or just project internal still? On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 3:41 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > > Hello, > > I just wanted to announce that we merged today the last fix to support > Java 11 in our build system. Notice that Avro is still Java 8 > compatible and will remain for long time

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.9.0 RC4

+1 (binding) -- Good: * signatures * checksums * tag/ref lines up with src artifact (except for one file mentioned below) * LICENSE/NOTICE spot check * apache rat says the license files for all the artifacts are fine (except it couldn't understand the gem; using the gem cli confirms it's also cor

[ANNOUNCE] Please welcome Fokko Driesprong to the Apache Avro PMC

Hi folks! On behalf of the Apache Avro PMC I am pleased to announce that Fokko Driesprong has accepted our invitation to become a PMC member on the Avro project. We appreciate Fokko stepping up to take more responsibility in the project. Please join me in welcoming Fokko to the Avro PMC! As a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.9.0 RC4

; > > published > > > > > > 5/8 > > > > > > (the same day as RC4 was announced but ~1week before vote passed). > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this the release build (presumably the same as RC4) or an earlier > > > >

[ANNOUNCE] Please welcome Ismaël Mejía to the Apache Avro PMC

Hi folks! On behalf of the Apache Avro PMC I am pleased to announce that Ismaël Mejía has accepted our invitation to become a PMC member. We appreciate Ismaël stepping up to take more responsibility in the project. Please join me in welcoming Ismaël to the Avro PMC! As a reminder, if anyone woul

sharp edges on moving to 1.9.0

What difficulties are folks running into when trying to move to 1.9.0 so far? -- busbey

Re: sharp edges on moving to 1.9.0

e, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:51 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > > What difficulties are folks running into when trying to move to 1.9.0 so far? > > -- > busbey -- busbey

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.9.1 RC1

please pull those artifacts off of nuget. We can only make approved releases available outside of the dev mailing list. On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:17 PM Brian Lachniet wrote: > > It sounds like an rc2 is imminent, but I went ahead and ran some basic > checks on the C# bindings. I didn't find any

[ANNOUNCE] Please welcome Brian Lachniet to the Apache Avro PMC

Hi folks! On behalf of the Apache Avro PMC I am pleased to announce that Brian Lachniet has accepted our invitation to become a PMC member. We appreciate Brian stepping up to take more responsibility in the project. Please join me in welcoming Brian to the Avro PMC! As a reminder, if anyone woul

[Announce] Please welcome Nándor Kollár to the Apache Avro PMC

Hi folks! On behalf of the Apache Avro PMC I am pleased to announce that Nándor Kollár has accepted our invitation to become a PMC member. We appreciate Nándor stepping up to take more responsibility in the project. Please join me in welcoming Nándor to the Avro PMC! As a reminder, if anyone wou

[DISCUSS] version numbers and where changes should land

Hi folks! historically, Avro version numbers have had the form: . . That is, the first number says wether or not we expect data serialization to be compatible, and the second to say wether we expect some library will be backwards incompatible however that's defined for the library's language.

Re: [DISCUSS] version numbers and where changes should land

ue, Sep 10, 2019 at 3:55 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > > +1 for changing the version strings to follow a more standard convention. > We don't have any breaking format changes, so I think it is expected that > the format compatibility version won't change. > > On Tue, Sep

DRAFT ASF Board Report - Apache Avro October 2019

Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 4:3. Community changes, past quarter: - Sean Busbey became PMC Chair - Brian Lachniet was added to the PMC on 2019-08-23 - Nándor Kollár was added to the PMC on 2019-08-29 - No new committers. Last addition was Tim Perkins on 2018-12-12. Releases, past quarter: -

Re: DRAFT ASF Board Report - Apache Avro October 2019

I went ahead and posted the report, with one minor change noted below. I can still edit it over the next few days if needed. On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:00 AM Sean Busbey wrote: > > ## Activity: > The Avro project slowly is improving on our gains from the last year. > > We've

[ANNOUNCE] new committer Michael Smith

Hi folks! I'm very pleased to announce that Michael Smith has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a committer on the Apache Avro project. Please join me in congratulating Michael on this recognition of their great work thus far in our community.

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1063) Ruby client should use multi_json rather than being locked down to yajl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13758038#comment-13758038 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1063: --- The main issue is that a patch was never submi

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1063) Ruby client should use multi_json rather than being locked down to yajl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13781273#comment-13781273 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1063: --- Overall looks good. I haven't gotten t

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1063) Ruby client should use multi_json rather than being locked down to yajl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13851347#comment-13851347 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1063: --- I tested this with a few different json provi

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1459) 'gem install avro' does not work for version 1.7.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904207#comment-13904207 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1459: --- What version of ruby / gems are you using? Is i

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1459) 'gem install avro' does not work for version 1.7.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13904771#comment-13904771 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1459: --- bq. Is there a specific reason why there a

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-1459) 'gem install avro' does not work for version 1.7.6

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-1459: -- Fix Version/s: 1.7.7 Unfortunately, I don't think the project currently has a primary Ruby maint

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1477) Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserialization With Bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13926096#comment-13926096 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1477: --- Hey Jesse, the getting started guide is pr

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-1477) Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserialization With Bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-1477: -- Attachment: AVRO-1477.2.cwiki.txt Unfortunately, I also don't have edit privileges on the

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-1477) Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserialization With Bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-1477: -- Attachment: (was: AVRO-1477.2.cwiki.txt) > Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserializat

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-1477) Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserialization With Bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-1477: -- Attachment: AVRO-1477.2.cwiki.txt > Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserialization With By

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1477) Add Documentation For Serialization and Deserialization With Bytes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13933903#comment-13933903 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1477: --- Thanks Doug! > Add Documentation For Serial

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1482) in specification, put "null" first in unions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13935517#comment-13935517 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1482: --- +1 looks good to me. > in specification, pu

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1063) Ruby client should use multi_json rather than being locked down to yajl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13939557#comment-13939557 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1063: --- Hi Neville! That issue is fixed as AVRO-1459 an

[jira] [Resolved] (AVRO-1376) not in union ["string","null"]

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey resolved AVRO-1376. --- Resolution: Not A Problem > not in union ["strin

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-1362) C# parser allows incorrect syntax for record fields of a named type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-1362: -- Component/s: (was: java) csharp Summary: C# parser allows incorrect syntax

[jira] [Created] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

Sean Busbey created AVRO-1485: - Summary: Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type. Key: AVRO-1485 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1485) Specification says Record field type can be record name but implementation allows any named type.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13940491#comment-13940491 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1485: --- That's covered already in the "

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1402) Support for DECIMAL primitive type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942426#comment-13942426 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1402: --- re: #1, what are the use cases we enable by set

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-1490) GenericDatumWriter throws exception for nullable schema fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-1490: -- Description: providing sample code and fix Sample Schema: {code} {"namespace": "Avro

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1490) GenericDatumWriter throws exception for nullable schema fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13955522#comment-13955522 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1490: --- Hi Johan! Your example schema doesn

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1402) Support for DECIMAL primitive type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13956555#comment-13956555 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1402: --- bq. If we do choose to storing scale per row,

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1534) Generate shema from a Java object

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14047178#comment-14047178 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1534: --- Take a look at [the Java reflection API|

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1124) RESTful service for holding schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14059681#comment-14059681 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1124: --- [~gwenshap], there's an unused static

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1544) Union of enum and null can result in NPE on validate if null is not first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14059982#comment-14059982 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1544: --- AVRO-997 is def not backwards compatible.

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1124) RESTful service for holding schemas

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14059984#comment-14059984 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1124: --- I noticed that all of the Named injection po

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1544) Union of enum and null can result in NPE on validate if null is not first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14060737#comment-14060737 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1544: --- +1 LGTM. Ran through without fix and test fa

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1544) Union of enum and null can result in NPE on validate if null is not first

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14083313#comment-14083313 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1544: --- I think the patch is ready to apply, but am s

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-997) Union of enum and null cannot be serialized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-997: - Status: In Progress (was: Patch Available) > Union of enum and null cannot be seriali

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-997) Union of enum and null cannot be serialized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-997: - Attachment: AVRO-997.patch Updated patch for current trunk; some parts OBE by other tickets, fixed some

[jira] [Updated] (AVRO-997) Union of enum and null cannot be serialized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated AVRO-997: - Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress) > Union of enum and null cannot be seriali

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1566) Use field default value to fill in missing values when serializing records

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14094602#comment-14094602 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1566: --- {noformat} + else: +self.write_

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1567) Avro java tools tests fail with IBM JVM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14107299#comment-14107299 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1567: --- There should be a mailing list discus

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1567) Avro java tools tests fail with IBM JVM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14112267#comment-14112267 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1567: --- {quote} After a complete clean (in my

[jira] [Commented] (AVRO-1126) Upgrade to Jackson 2+

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14131599#comment-14131599 ] Sean Busbey commented on AVRO-1126: --- Is anyone currently working on this ti

[jira] [Assigned] (AVRO-1585) Remove Jackson classes from public Schema API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey reassigned AVRO-1585: - Assignee: Sean Busbey > Remove Jackson classes from public Schema

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >