Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-19 Thread Ismaël Mejía
-1 for the CVE reported in AVRO-2865. It is not a severe CVE but better to include the fix since many projects depend on maven-plugin. I will prepare a new RC and publish it here beginning of next week. In the meantime please help us test and report any extra issues you may see. Regards, Ismaël

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-16 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Kind reminder, We have so far 2 PMCs +1 Please vote, help us with testing and validation in particular in less maintained languages. On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:50 AM Ryan Skraba wrote: > > There's an issue to track the C# build issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2847

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-15 Thread Ryan Skraba
There's an issue to track the C# build issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2847 Relaunching the job will usually end up fixing it. I couldn't reproduce it on a local Window VM so it might be only happening on travis. It should be unrelated to the release 1.10.x Best regards, Ryan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-14 Thread RumeshKrishnan Mohan
Hi Team, Is someone aware of the build issue ? Looks like all the build failures for the last couple of days. + dotnet build --configuration Release Avro.sln > 90 Restore completed in 2.89 sec for > C:\Users\travis\build\apache\avro\lang\csharp\src\apache\codegen\Avro.codegen.csproj. > 91

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-14 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Thanks Ismaël for running the release. I've just tested an all looks good. +1 (binding) Cheers, Fokko Op za 13 jun. 2020 om 13:23 schreef Ryan Skraba : > The only change necessary to compile Parquet with the 1.10.0 RC1 > artifacts was to add `public` to > the parquet-avro pom.xml so that field

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-13 Thread Ryan Skraba
The only change necessary to compile Parquet with the 1.10.0 RC1 artifacts was to add `public` to the parquet-avro pom.xml so that field members are generated with public access (the default is now private). Or we could rewrite the test classes to use getters! (Just for info, if you want to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-12 Thread Michael Heuer
Hello Ryan, If you don't mind me asking, what were the changes you found necessary for Parquet to work with Avro 1.10? The only reason I lurk on this mailing list is in the vain hope that Parquet and Avro and Spark will work together nicely at some point. michael > On Jun 12, 2020, at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-12 Thread Ryan Skraba
Hello! I checked the signature and SHA512 sums of the artifacts. Internally we have a large library of internal code that uses Avro 1.9, and it all recompiled and tests succeeded without modification. We have some other code that definitely breaks with 1.10 because of AVRO-2278 (getting an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Been playing around with it a bit and it looks OK. Dan > On Jun 11, 2020, at 4:53 AM, Ismaël Mejía wrote: > > Kind reminder two days have passed, please check and vote! > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:29 AM Andy Le wrote: >> >> Hey Ryan, >> >> Thank you for your clear explanation. >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-11 Thread Tim Perkins
Downloaded the Ruby gem and tested with several other Ruby libraries that depend on Avro: avro-builder, avromatic, avro_turf, avro-resolution_canonical_form [x] +1 Release this as Apache Avro 1.10.0 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Do not release this because... On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 4:54 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-11 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Kind reminder two days have passed, please check and vote! On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:29 AM Andy Le wrote: > > Hey Ryan, > > Thank you for your clear explanation. > > +1 for me :D > > Thank you. > > > On 2020/06/10 14:39:10, Ryan Skraba wrote: > > Hey Anh, a release requires 3 PMC votes, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-10 Thread Andy Le
Hey Ryan, Thank you for your clear explanation. +1 for me :D Thank you. On 2020/06/10 14:39:10, Ryan Skraba wrote: > Hey Anh, a release requires 3 PMC votes, but "unofficial" opinions are > welcome and taken into account. My opinion is unofficial too! > > Just reply with a +1 if you think

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-10 Thread Ryan Skraba
Hey Anh, a release requires 3 PMC votes, but "unofficial" opinions are welcome and taken into account. My opinion is unofficial too! Just reply with a +1 if you think the artifacts are good to go or -1 if you've found a bug, regression, security issue, or something that should block these

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-10 Thread Anh Le
Hi, How can I make a vote on this? Best Regards. On Tue, 9 Jun 2020, 22:28 Ismaël Mejía, wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to propose the following RC1 to be released as the official Apache > Avro 1.10.0 release. > > The commit id is 1301a045396cf0e6ca7f12c9e4053b4f81237887 > > * This

[VOTE] Release Apache Avro 1.10.0 RC1

2020-06-09 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Hi everyone, I'd like to propose the following RC1 to be released as the official Apache Avro 1.10.0 release. The commit id is 1301a045396cf0e6ca7f12c9e4053b4f81237887 * This corresponds to the tag: release-1.10.0-rc1 * https://github.com/apache/avro/releases/tag/release-1.10.0-rc1 The release