I mostly agree!
I would be very, very surprised if someone ever wrote code where the
correct behaviour relied on *failing* to resolve two schemas because
the spec says so!
I also think the Java implementation is doing the right and convenient
thing. I've typically used new record names for new s
This may be an example of Postel's Law, where neither the implementation
nor the spec are wrong. An implementation is allowed to accept more than
the the strictest interpretation of the spec. Within reason, we prefer
that folks can read data rather than get an error when trying. (We also
want th
Hello! I've been going through some code that should be cleaned up if
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2492 is applied (removing
one of the deprecated record schema constructores).
In the meantime, I have a question about names in general. I noticed
in the spec:
https://avro.apache.or
