Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink 1.1.0 (RC2)

2022-08-02 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Boto wrote: > Hi Mridul, > > Thanks for checking.. > Do you have installed on your computer a docker environment? > This is needed for testcontainers that we use on testing.. > > Le me know if is that > > On 2022/07/29 15:11:21 Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > The t

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink 1.1.0 (RC2)

2022-07-29 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
The tests failed for me with [1] I also saw this at the top of build [2], but dont think it was related. Any pointers ? Thanks, Mridul [1] [INFO] Running org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.flume.FlumeSinkTest SLF4J: Failed to load class "org.slf4j.impl.StaticLoggerBinder". SLF4J:

Re: [DISCUSS][bahir-flink] Drop Java 7 support

2017-09-19 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Thanks for clarifying Robert ! Given this, I am +1 on removing support too. Regards, Mridul On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > Thanks all for the overwhelming support to drop Java7. > > @Mridul: I don't know for sure what the schedule for Flink 1.4

Re: [DISCUSS][bahir-flink] Drop Java 7 support

2017-09-16 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Do we know when Flink 1.4 is expected to be out ? Will we be making any intermediate Bahir release for flink before then ? If we are not making any, then dropping java 7 will have no impact for our users. On spark side, jdk 7 support has already been dropped. Regards, Mridul On Sat, Sep 16,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.2.0 (RC1)

2017-08-18 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Build works fine, signatures check out, tests run successfully. +1 for release. Btw, I dont recall RAT check failing build earlier, very nice touch to enforce it as part of build ! Regards, Mridul On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Dear

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
; The issue reported was for Spark extensions >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88 >> >> >> And I guess it is also applicable for Flink extensions >> >> >> But the issue is still open. >> >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Mrid

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-23 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
n, May 21, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Mridul Muralidharan <mridul...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> From the release tag, clean build and tests work fine, signatures match. >> >> The source at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/bahir-flink/1. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC5)

2017-05-22 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Hi, From the release tag, clean build and tests work fine, signatures match. The source at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/bahir-flink/1.0-rc5/ has additional files which are not in repo: Not in repo ./distribution/pom.xml.releaseBackup Not in repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir Flink extensions 1.0 (RC3)

2017-04-11 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
+1 for release. Tag checks out fine - full build and tests go through fine. Signatures validated. Regards, Mridul On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > Bahir Flink extensions 1.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.1.0 (RC1)

2017-02-07 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
ll prior Apache Bahir source distributions contained these release > build artifacts. > > I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88 to track it. > > Thanks, Christian > >> -------- >> Fr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC3)

2017-01-23 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
+1 Build succeeds and tests run fine from the tag. Signature's check out fine. Regards, Mridul On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Christian Kadner wrote: > Please vote to approve the third release candidate for Apache Bahir > version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.1 (RC1)

2016-10-21 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
+1 for release. Tests pass. Signatures checkout. Great work everybody ! Regards, Mridul On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > Bahir version 2.0.1 based on Apache Spark 2.0.1.

Re: Documentation for Bahir Flink extensions

2016-08-26 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
+1 sounds good. Regards Mridul On Friday, August 26, 2016, Luciano Resende wrote: > For the Spark extensions we currently have a README.md on each extension > project which helps users accessing github to easily find out how to use > the extension, and we also use that to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Bahir 2.0.0

2016-08-15 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Congratulations, great job everyone ! Regards Mridul On Monday, August 15, 2016, Luciano Resende wrote: > The Apache Bahir PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Bahir > 2.0.0 which is our first major release and provides the following > extensions for Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.0 (RC1)

2016-08-10 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
Continuing with my earlier mail : Signatures check out +1 for release. If we do cut another RC, would be great to include Prashant's doc changes - but agree that we dont want to block release on that. Regards, Mridul On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.0 (RC1)

2016-08-09 Thread Mridul Muralidharan
- Built from source successfully. - Tests run successfully. - README.md still has "Coming Soon." for sections 'Online Documentation' and 'A Note About Apache Spark Integration'. - md5 signatures validated - I did not find the key used to sign artifacts, so did not validate that. Queries: a) Do