Re: Added a Jira beginner's guide to the wiki.

2019-02-26 Thread Ahmet Altay
Thank you Daniel, this is great information. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:47 AM Daniel Oliveira wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In a recent thread in this list I mentioned that it might be nice to have > a short guide for our Jira on the wiki since there were some aspects of > Jira that I found a bit

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #2

2019-02-26 Thread Kenneth Knowles
+1 (binding) Ran run_rc_validation.sh and said "yes" to everything up to one mobile gaming example. I did not get to the Python tests towards the end of the script (it is the same as last RC anyhow? I did not verify this) On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:16 PM Charles Chen wrote: > Thank you, +1. I

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #2

2019-02-26 Thread Reuven Lax
+1 (binding) On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:16 PM Charles Chen wrote: > Thank you, +1. I tested Python 3 support in batch and streaming mode > (using wordcount and streaming wordcount) on both DirectRunner and > DataflowRunner. > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:54 AM Konstantinos Katsiapis < >

precommit tests: please ignore Python_pytest

2019-02-26 Thread Udi Meiri
Hi all, I'm testing running Python tests using pytest, and I've added a temporary Jenkins jobs that seems to be triggering for PRs, even though I set triggerPathPatterns to an empty list. (file ) Please

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #2

2019-02-26 Thread Charles Chen
Thank you, +1. I tested Python 3 support in batch and streaming mode (using wordcount and streaming wordcount) on both DirectRunner and DataflowRunner. On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 7:54 AM Konstantinos Katsiapis wrote: > +1. > (Same rational as my earlier post for RC1). > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at

Re: Beam Jenkins job summary available in .test-infra/jenkins/REAMDE.md

2019-02-26 Thread Mikhail Gryzykhin
This looks nice. Would also be great if we can add links to docs on how to re-run relevant job/tests on local machine. Regards, --Mikhail Have feedback ? On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:38 AM Mark Liu wrote: > Glad to hear that! > > Thanks, > Mark > > On Sat, Feb 16,

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #2

2019-02-26 Thread Konstantinos Katsiapis
+1. (Same rational as my earlier post for RC1). On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:19 AM Maximilian Michels wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * Verified checksums > * Ran quickstart WordCount tests local/cluster with the Flink Runner > > -Max > > On 26.02.19 10:40, Ahmet Altay wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #2

2019-02-26 Thread Maximilian Michels
+1 (binding) * Verified checksums * Ran quickstart WordCount tests local/cluster with the Flink Runner -Max On 26.02.19 10:40, Ahmet Altay wrote: Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 2.11.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #1

2019-02-26 Thread Ahmet Altay
Thank you all for the validations. I sent out RC2 with a fix to BEAM-6697. This affects Java artifacts but Python artifacts are same for both RCs. Please help with validating RC2. Thank you! On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:49 PM Charles Chen wrote: > +1. I tested Python 3 support in batch and

[VOTE] Release 2.11.0, release candidate #2

2019-02-26 Thread Ahmet Altay
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 2.11.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],