Re: Proposal: Add permanent url to community metrics dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Mikhail Gryzykhin
@Aizamat Code is not generalized and is project specific in some places. But it is small and pretty straightforward so can be ported easily. Whole thing can be started locally with a single docker command, so it's easy to try it out. On Fri, May 17, 2019, 19:33 Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy wrote: > Hi

Re: Proposal: Add permanent url to community metrics dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
Hi Mikhail, I think this dashboard is amazing, and would love to have an easy access to it. So here is my non binding +1. On the side note, how easy is to recreate it for other Apache projects? ;) Thanks, Aizhamal *From: *Mikhail Gryzykhin *Date: *Fri, May 17, 2019 at 6:49 PM *To: *dev Hello

Re: Proposal: Add permanent url to community metrics dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Pablo Estrada
We've talked about this offline. I love these dashboards, and use them often. I'm in favor of doing this, but I'll let others chime in before explicitly voting. Another reason why I am in favor of this is that you've always been responsive and willing to add improvements to it, so I can imagine th

Proposal: Add permanent url to community metrics dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Mikhail Gryzykhin
Hello everyone, Some time ago we started community metrics dashboard. However we never had added a permanent URL for it. This is really inconvenient to use, since only available way to access dashboard is by IP-address. In this tread I'd like to: 1. V

Re: Postcommit kiosk dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Mikhail Gryzykhin
Hi Kyle, Currently available dashboard documentation is located on cwiki and github . I'll start a separate thread with voting on getting it a permanent url. Initia

Re: Postcommit kiosk dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Kyle Weaver
Hmm just wasn't working on my desktop; maybe a proxy issue. How about giving this a permanent URL and maybe some documentation? Thanks On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:28 PM Pablo Estrada wrote: > The dashboard's here: > http://104.154.241.245/d/8N6LVeCmk/post-commits-status-dashboard?orgId=1 > > Or

CassandraIOTest failing in presubmit

2019-05-17 Thread Alex Amato
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7355?filter=-2 Error Message com.datastax.driver.core.exceptions.NoHostAvailableException: All host(s) tried for query failed (tried: localhost/127.0.0.1:9042 (com.datastax.driver.core.exceptions.TransportException: [localhost/ 127.0.0.1:9042] Cannot con

Re: [VOTE] Remove deprecated Java Reference Runner code from repository.

2019-05-17 Thread Daniel Oliveira
It's been 72 hours and this vote has passed. There are 10 approving votes, 5 of which are binding: * Lukasz Cwik * Ahmet Altay * Pablo Estrada * Robert Bradshaw * Maximilian Michels There are no disapproving votes. With that decided, I'll get someone to merge the change on Monday (I'm hesitant t

Re: Postcommit kiosk dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Pablo Estrada
The dashboard's here: http://104.154.241.245/d/8N6LVeCmk/post-commits-status-dashboard?orgId=1 Or are you looking for something else in particular? Best -P. On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 4:18 PM Kyle Weaver wrote: > Whatever happened to this dashboard? Having to manually maintain multiple > lists of

Re: Postcommit kiosk dashboard

2019-05-17 Thread Kyle Weaver
Whatever happened to this dashboard? Having to manually maintain multiple lists of long links is a pain, and error-prone to boot. (Sorry for resurrecting a month-old thread) Kyle Weaver | Software Engineer | github.com/ibzib | kcwea...@google.com | +1650203 On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 2:53 AM I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Pablo Estrada

2019-05-17 Thread Hannah Jiang
Congratulations, Pablo, you deserve it! *From: *Mark Liu *Date: *Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:45 PM *To: * Congratulations, Pablo! > > *From: *Alexey Romanenko > *Date: *Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:12 AM > *To: *dev > > Congratulations, Pablo! >> >> On 16 May 2019, at 20:38, Rui Wang wrote: >> >> Congra

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Pablo Estrada

2019-05-17 Thread Mark Liu
Congratulations, Pablo! *From: *Alexey Romanenko *Date: *Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:12 AM *To: *dev Congratulations, Pablo! > > On 16 May 2019, at 20:38, Rui Wang wrote: > > Congrats! Congrats! Congrats! > > -Rui > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:45 AM Udi Meiri wrote: > >> Congrats Pablo! >> >> On Th

Re: Definition of Unified model (WAS: Semantics of PCollection.isBounded)

2019-05-17 Thread Jan Lukavský
Hi Reuven, > How so? AFAIK stateful DoFns work just fine in batch runners. Stateful ParDo works in batch as far, as the logic inside the state works for absolutely unbounded out-of-orderness of elements. That basically (practically) can work only for cases, where the order of input elements d

Re: Definition of Unified model (WAS: Semantics of PCollection.isBounded)

2019-05-17 Thread Reuven Lax
*From: *Jozef Vilcek *Date: *Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:31 AM *To: * Interesting discussion. I think it is very important information, that when > user will use a stateful ParDo, he can run into the situation where it will > not behave correctly in "batch operating mode". > How so? AFAIK stateful D

Re: Definition of Unified model (WAS: Semantics of PCollection.isBounded)

2019-05-17 Thread Reuven Lax
*From: *Jan Lukavský *Date: *Thu, May 16, 2019 at 8:09 AM *To: * Hi Max, > answers inline. > -- Původní e-mail -- > Od: Maximilian Michels > Komu: dev@beam.apache.org > Datum: 16. 5. 2019 15:59:59 > Předmět: Re: Definition of Unified model (WAS: Semantics of > PCollection.isBoun

Re: Dealing with incompatible changes in build system on LTS releases

2019-05-17 Thread Michael Luckey
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:56 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:21 AM Lukasz Cwik wrote: > >> >> >> *From: *Michael Luckey >> *Date: *Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:42 PM >> *To: * >> >> Hi, >>> >>> do we currently have a strategy on how to handle LTS releases in context >>> o

Re: Definition of Unified model (WAS: Semantics of PCollection.isBounded)

2019-05-17 Thread Jan Lukavský
Hi, I realised another example how to demonstrate what I mean by "streaming semantics should be subset of batch semantics" (and not vice versa), that is - iterations are easily defined in batch case, but are very tricky in streaming case, and there is a huge probability, that even if you define

Re: Definition of Unified model (WAS: Semantics of PCollection.isBounded)

2019-05-17 Thread Jozef Vilcek
Interesting discussion. I think it is very important information, that when user will use a stateful ParDo, he can run into the situation where it will not behave correctly in "batch operating mode". But some transforms known to Beam, like fixed-window, will work fine? Is there a sorting applied to

Re: learning kata as root project

2019-05-17 Thread Michael Luckey
Hi Henry, unfortunately I do not know how to give advice here. I would first need to better understand the semantics. What I recommend we should do, is to add some documentation first. As starting point, we might just copy some of the info given on the PR [1]. I d say, those are worth to be adde

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Pablo Estrada

2019-05-17 Thread Alexey Romanenko
Congratulations, Pablo! > On 16 May 2019, at 20:38, Rui Wang wrote: > > Congrats! Congrats! Congrats! > > -Rui > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:45 AM Udi Meiri > wrote: > Congrats Pablo! > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:27 AM Thomas Weise > wrote: