Hi,
Can you please trigger pre-commit checks for
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11581
Thanks,
Rahul
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:12 AM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> Done for both Yoshiki and Tomo's PRs.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:33 PM Tomo Suzuki wrote:
>
>> Hi Beam committers,
>>
>> Would you
I'll be happy to mentor for improvements to the Capability Matrix. There
had been some discussions about that earlier.
+Kenneth Knowles +Robert Bradshaw
+Thomas
Weise I may set a quick meeting with each of you to get
your thoughts about Capability Matrix improvements. (also happy to welcome
an
Done for both Yoshiki and Tomo's PRs.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:33 PM Tomo Suzuki wrote:
> Hi Beam committers,
>
> Would you run the basic precommit checks for
> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11674 ?
>
> Regards,
> Tomo
>
Hi Beam committers,
Would you run the basic precommit checks for
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11674 ?
Regards,
Tomo
Cool! I signed up as a mentor.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:56 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
wrote:
> PS: I am registered as a mentor too, happy to onboard the tech writers to
> The Apache Way and Beam community processes when time comes.
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:52 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>
StartBundle pre-dated setUp, which makes it less useful than before. With
DoFn re-use, however, startBundle can be used to ensure the DoFn is
instantiated to a clean state.
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 2:03 PM Reuven Lax wrote:
> I think startBundle is useful for convenience and performance, but not
This is filed as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20231 which
should take place now.
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:53 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> +1 sounds good to me. Oftentimes I confused the relative priorities of
> critical/blocker/major.
>
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 3:05 PM Tyson Hamilton
Thanks for the great feedback so far :). I've included many new ideas, and
made some revisions. Both docs have changed a fair bit since the initial
mail out.
https://s.apache.org/beam-gcp-debuggability
https://s.apache.org/beam-histogram-metrics
PTAL and let me know what you think, and hopefully
PS: I am registered as a mentor too, happy to onboard the tech writers to
The Apache Way and Beam community processes when time comes.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:52 PM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
wrote:
> Apache Beam got accepted into Season of Docs, yay! [1]
>
> @Kyle/Pablo, could you please fill
Apache Beam got accepted into Season of Docs, yay! [1]
@Kyle/Pablo, could you please fill out the mentor registration form by
tomorrow morning [2]?
Is there anyone else interested in becoming a mentor for either of the 2
projects [3]? The program requires at least two open source mentors for
Updates for today:
- Thanks Brian & Ahmet for your reviews. I left my comments for some of the
questions and also adapted new changes to the reviews [1].
- I see that the new blog post was merged yesterday, so I added it to the
PR as well.
I briefly tried the script from Robert with the input of
@Ismael, this is in my work items for as soon as we complete the migration
of the website.
@Kyle, thanks for filing Jira, I assigned it to myself.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:03 AM Kyle Weaver wrote:
> > Now that the vote has passed maybe we should add the images somewhere
> > in the website so
I agree with the point echoed earlier that the lowest and the highest of
supported versions will probably give the most useful test signal for
possible breakages. So 3.5. and 3.7 as high-priority versions SGTM.
This can change later once Beam drops 3.5 support.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:05 AM
We've since moved our official Docker images here:
https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam_python=image
But Docker downloads are not as representative of actual usage as PyPI.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 1:05 PM Yoshiki Obata
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Test infrastructure update is ongoing
Hello again,
Test infrastructure update is ongoing and then we should determine
which Python versions are high-priority.
According to Pypi downloads stats[1], download proportion of Python
3.5 is almost always greater than one of 3.6 and 3.7.
This situation has not changed since Robert told us
Thank you :)
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:30 PM Luke Cwik wrote:
> Welcome, I have added you as a JIRA contributor.
>
> The Apache Beam contribution guide[1] is a good starting point and/or the
> starter JIRAs[2].
>
> 1: https://beam.apache.org/contribute/
> 2:
> Now that the vote has passed maybe we should add the images somewhere
> in the website so people can easily find the Firefly to use it
+1 Maybe something to revisit after the website overhaul is complete. I
filed https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9948 if anyone wants to take
it.
On Mon,
Now that the vote has passed maybe we should add the images somewhere
in the website so people can easily find the Firefly to use it.
Something like what we do with our logos
https://beam.apache.org/community/logos/
WDYT? any taker?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:43 PM Pablo Estrada wrote:
>
> I'll
Thanks Ismaël for recalling of this thread, I think we should start to take
some efforts to deprecate the AWS SDK V1 IOs that are already implemeneted
using V2 (if there are no other objections). In this case, it would make sense
to abstract some common code ONLY if ,for some reasons, we
Welcome, I have added you as a JIRA contributor.
The Apache Beam contribution guide[1] is a good starting point and/or the
starter JIRAs[2].
1: https://beam.apache.org/contribute/
2: https://s.apache.org/beam-starter-tasks
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 7:55 AM Borzoo Esmailloo
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I
Deleting ignored tests does lead us to losing the reason as to why the test
case was around so I would rather keep it around. I think it would be more
valuable to generate a report that goes on the website/wiki showing
stability of the modules (num tests, num passed, num skipped, num failed
Thanks for the fix Max.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 5:46 AM Maximilian Michels wrote:
> FYI I've created this issue and marked it as a blocker:
> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9947
>
> Essentially, the timer encoding is broken for all non-standard key
> coders. The fix can be found here:
Many thanks, Darshan! I’ve made equivalent changes to my test case and it’s
working fine.
Kind regards,
Rob
From: Darshan Jani [mailto:darshanjani...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 May 2020 15:08
To: dev@beam.apache.org
Subject: Re: Unit-testing BEAM pipelines with PROCESSING_TIME timers
Hi Robert,
I found this sample test with Timer on processing time.
>From the error, I assume there may be is a problem what are you asserting
in your PAssert.
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/sdks/java/core/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/transforms/ParDoTest.java#L3633-L3665
I ran
Thank you Hannah!
And could anyone trigger these checks again in
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11656 ?
Run Portable_Python PreCommit
Run Python 3.5 PostCommit
Run Python 3.6 PostCommit
Run Python 3.7 PostCommit
Regards
yoshiki
2020年5月11日(月) 12:54 Hannah Jiang :
>
> It is done. Some more
FYI I've created this issue and marked it as a blocker:
https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-9947
Essentially, the timer encoding is broken for all non-standard key
coders. The fix can be found here: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11658
-Max
On 08.05.20 18:53, Udi Meiri wrote:
> +Chad
ERROR: File 'src/build/dependencyUpdates/beam-dependency-check-report.html' does not exist
I have a BEAM DoFn that I'm attempting to unit test. It involves using a timer
based on processing time and I've not managed to get it to fire. The relevant
code excerpts are as follows:
@TimerId("timer")
private final TimerSpec timer = TimerSpecs.timer(TimeDomain.PROCESSING_TIME);
I think that we do have Jira issues for ignored test, there should be no
problem with that. The questionable point is that when test gets
Ignored, people might consider the problem as "less painful" and
postpone the correct solution until ... forever. I'd just like to
discuss if people see
Hi,
@Ahmet: Yeah, it's all clear to me. :)
@Robert: Thanks for your ideas and also the script. It really helps me to
serve my works.
Best regard!
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 2:10 AM Ahmet Altay wrote:
> This sounds reasonable to me. Thank you. Nam, does it make sense to you?
>
> On Fri, May 8,
30 matches
Mail list logo
