Re: [External] : Re: outputReceiver.output() does not emit the result immediately

2021-01-26 Thread yu . b . zhang
Hi Boyuan, Thanks for replying. We are using beam 2.25.0 and direct runner for testing. We are trying to develop an unbounded streaming service connector with splittable DoFn. In our connector.read(), we want to commit the message back to stream after output the record to downstream user

Re: Problems building latest beam source

2021-01-26 Thread Kyle Weaver
This should be fixed now. On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:23 AM Kyle Weaver wrote: > I missed this thread and filed a JIRA for it: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11689 > > > We could swap the spring.io repo for the pentaho nexus one > public.nexus.pentaho.org (here probably in Beam >

Re: [Proposal] Release Guide improvements

2021-01-26 Thread Robert Burke
Dang it. Good catch. Thanks. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11693 is the right JIRA. On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 3:56 PM Robert Burke wrote: > Hello Beamers! > > I just filled a JIRA BEAM-11217 [1] to make some changes and update the > content of the release guide, based on my

Re: [Proposal] Release Guide improvements

2021-01-26 Thread Kyle Weaver
> One bigger change to the content that certainly warrants discussion here: I'd like to remove the manual command level copies of the automation scripts in the release document. I approve. I already removed a large chunk of the copies in [1], but I may have missed some places. I think BEAM-11217

[Proposal] Release Guide improvements

2021-01-26 Thread Robert Burke
Hello Beamers! I just filled a JIRA BEAM-11217 [1] to make some changes and update the content of the release guide, based on my experiences with running the 2.26.0 release. Overall, the content is pretty thorough, but it's been added to organically over time, and is due for a bit of a cleanup.

Re: Beam support Flink Async I/O operator

2021-01-26 Thread Boyuan Zhang
+dev On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:07 PM Eleanore Jin wrote: > Hi community, > > Does Beam support Flink Async I/O operator? if so, can you please share > the doc, and if not, is there any workaround to achieve the same in Beam > semantics? > > >

Re: Multiple architectures support on Beam (ARM)

2021-01-26 Thread Robert Burke
I believe so. The Go SDK requires in most instances for a user to Register their DoFns at package init time, linked to the type/functions fully qualified path as detemined by Go, which is consistent across architectures, at least with the standard toochain. Those strings are used to look things

Re: Contributor permission for Beam Jira

2021-01-26 Thread Pablo Estrada
Welcome, Jamie! And thanks for the contribution! I've marked you as a contributor on JIRA, so you can assign issues to yourself now. Best -P. On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:47 AM Jamie Thomson wrote: > Hello, > > > > I am exploring Beam ahead of a new job I’m starting soon in which I’ll be > using

Re: Multiple architectures support on Beam (ARM)

2021-01-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
Cool. Are DoFn (et al) references compatible across cross-compiled binaries? On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 11:23 AM Robert Burke wrote: > Go cross compilation is as simple as setting the right flag env variables > [1], but can be as complicated as requiring a cross compiling GCC instance > installed

Re: Multiple architectures support on Beam (ARM)

2021-01-26 Thread Robert Burke
Go cross compilation is as simple as setting the right flag env variables [1], but can be as complicated as requiring a cross compiling GCC instance installed if CGO[2] is necessary. I think we're probably clear on just needing the flag though for the various Boot executables. For go pipelines

Re: Multiple architectures support on Beam (ARM)

2021-01-26 Thread Robert Bradshaw
+1 I don't think it would be that hard to build and release arm-based docker images. (Perhaps just a matter of changing the docker file to depend on a different base, and doing some cross-compile. That would suss out whether we're inadvertently taking on any incompatible dependencies.)

Re: Problems building latest beam source

2021-01-26 Thread Kyle Weaver
I missed this thread and filed a JIRA for it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-11689 > We could swap the spring.io repo for the pentaho nexus one public.nexus.pentaho.org (here probably in Beam

Re: outputReceiver.output() does not emit the result immediately

2021-01-26 Thread Boyuan Zhang
+dev Hi Yu, Which runner are you using for your pipeline? Also it would be helpful to share your pipeline code as well. On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 PM wrote: > Hi Beam Community, > > I have a splittable `DoFn` that reads message from some stream and output > the result to down stream. The

Multiple architectures support on Beam (ARM)

2021-01-26 Thread Ismaël Mejía
I stumbled today on this user request: BEAM-10982 Wheel support for linux aarch64 It made me wonder if with the advent of ARM64 processors not only in the client but server side (Graviton and others) if it is worth that we start to think about having support for this architecture on the python

Re: Problems building latest beam source

2021-01-26 Thread Tyson Hamilton
I saw this issue on another OSS repo ( https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/2479), they just removed the spring.io repository but I'm not sure where their dep would come from then. We could swap the spring.io repo for the pentaho nexus one public.nexus.pentaho.org (here probably in Beam

Contributor permission for Beam Jira

2021-01-26 Thread Jamie Thomson
Hello, I am exploring Beam ahead of a new job I’m starting soon in which I’ll be using Beam/Dataflow. I’ve spotted a small typo in the beam docs that I’d like to correct as (a) its rather misleading and (b) correcting typos is a nice easy way of getting involved in Beam  Can I be added as a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Piotr Szuberski

2021-01-26 Thread Reza Rokni
Congrats! On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:25 AM Piotr Szuberski wrote: > Thank you everyone! I really don't know what to say. I'm truly honoured. I > do hope I will be able to keep up with the contributions. > > On 2021/01/22 16:32:45, Alexey Romanenko > wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Please join