Re: [JmsIO] => Pull Request to fix message acknowledgement issue

Hi Vincent, thanks, I will take a look (as original JmsIO author ;)). Regards JB On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 6:43 PM BALLADA Vincent wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a PR related to the following issue (Runner acknowledges messages on > closed session): > >

RE: [idea] A new IO connector named DataLakeIO, which support to connect Beam and data lake, such as Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, Apache iceberg.

Howdy, I have a client who would be interested to use this. Is there a link to a GitHub repo or other place I can read more? Neil (kol...@google.com) On 2022/08/05 07:23:31 张涛 wrote: > > Hi, we developed a new IO connector named DataLakeIO, to connect Beam and data lake, such as Delta Lake,

Re: Java compatibility checking library

I think this is still worth considering. We would need to see how well it does at avoiding false alarms. It was brought up by Andrew a while back at https://lists.apache.org/thread/kq2w6rw0oorcj037ygjvfsqw1l9l55jj and I know we had another discussion of it even further back. I thought also that

Re: Checkpointing on Google Cloud Dataflow Runner

Hi Will, David, I think you'll find the best source of answer for this sort of question on the user@beam list. I've put that in the To: line with a BCC: to the dev@beam list so everyone knows they can find the thread there. If I have misunderstood, and your question has to do with building Beam

Checkpointing on Google Cloud Dataflow Runner

Hello! I am wondering about using checkpoints with Beam running on Google Cloud Dataflow. The docs indicate that checkpoints are not supported by Google Cloud Dataflow: https://beam.apache.org/documentation/runners/capability-matrix/additional-common-features-not-yet-part-of-the-beam-model/

Java compatibility checking library

Hi folks! I learned about this library: https://lvc.github.io/japi-compliance-checker/ It looks like it's able to check API compatibility between versions of libraries. We could instate checks that use this library to be more aware of backwards incompatibilities that we may introduce

[JmsIO] => Pull Request to fix message acknowledgement issue

Hi all, Here is a PR related to the following issue (Runner acknowledges messages on closed session): https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/20814 And here is a documentation explaining the fix: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19HiNPoJeIlzCFyWGdlw7WEFutceL2AmN_5Z0Vmi1s-I/edit?usp=sharing And

Re: [Question] Progress on BEAM-9923 and how can I help?

Hey Ronoaldo, I believe some investigation has been done on adding a Go expansion service (written up here ), but no concrete work has been done yet. I don't know of any general guidelines

Beam High Priority Issue Report (70)

This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/22913 [Bug]:

Re: SingleStore IO

Thanks for the answer! It would be great to have a call with you. Here is a meeting invitation. SingleStore Beam connector discussion Wednesday, August 31 · 7:00 – 8:00pm Google Meet joining info Video call link: https://meet.google.com/uiq-btvt-tpw Or dial: ‪(GB) +44 20 3956 6918‬ PIN: ‪226 926