[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #2

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 7 approving votes, 4 of which are binding: * Aljoscha Krettek * Davor Bonaci * Ismaël Mejía * Jean-Baptiste Onofré * Robert Bradshaw * Ted Yu * Tibor Kiss There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone! Ahmet

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #2

t; > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > +Stas Levin <stasle...@apache.org> +Thomas Groh <tg...@google.com> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM Eugene Kirpichov < > kirpic...@google.com > > > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #2

shall not hold up the release. > > Thanks for putting this RC together! > > - Tibor > > On 3/11/17, 6:05 AM, "Ahmet Altay" <al...@google.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version &

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #2

It's not something local that happens in my env. so if > anyone else could validate this it would be great. > > Amit > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 9:48 PM Robert Bradshaw > <rober...@google.com.invalid> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Ahmet Altay

[VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #2

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 0.6.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1],

Re: First time PR question: Multiple issues addressed in single change

Hi Ankur On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Ankur Chauhan wrote: > Hi all, > > This is my first go at contributing some simple changes to the BigTableIO > in beam. The main intent was to update the dependency to 0.9.5.1 from the > current 0.9.2 which would address some changes

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #1

Let's cancel the vote on RC1 and I will start a new one. I think Davor had a great summary and I will make those changes for RC2. I only have one comment, I would rather keep a single file format (.zip) instead of using both file formats (.zip, .tar.gz). I think this is better for having a single

[VOTE] Release 0.6.0, release candidate #1

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 0.6.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1], *

Re: Release 0.6.0

B > > > On 03/01/2017 07:23 PM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > >> Thank you. I will start working on it. >> >> Ahmet >> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> I just closed the last blocking is

Re: Release 0.6.0

>>> I also try to merge https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1739 asap. > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> JB > > >>> > > >>> On 02/28/2017 09:34 AM, Amit Sela wrote: > > >>>> I'd prefer we wait to merge htt

Release 0.6.0

Hi all, It's been about a month since the last release. I would like propose starting the next release. There are no releasing blocking bugs in JIRA [1]. Are there any release blocking issues I am missing? Unless there is an objection I will volunteer to manage this release. This will be the

tf.Transform library for using TensorFlow with Beam

Hi all, Yesterday, there was an announcement from TensorFlow community about the new tf.Transform library [1]. It is a library that allows users to define pre-processing pipelines and run using large scale data processing frameworks. It is a library specifically designed to work with Apache Beam.

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: beam_PostCommit_Python_Verify #1308

I am looking at this right now, It is caused by https://github.com/apache/ beam/pull/2041. https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/2045 has a fix. Thank you, Ahmet On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > It seems Python build is failing. > > Gonna take a

Re: [DISCUSS] Python SDK status and next steps

ed by the default "regular" build. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 01/31/2017 11:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Just one thing

Re: [DISCUSS] Python SDK status and next steps

es, which was deferred while > > seeing how https://s.apache.org/splittable-do-fn played out. I've been > > working with the team and merging/reviewing most of their code, and > > have full confidence this will be coming (and on that note can vouch > > for a healthy community and s

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: beam_PostCommit_Python_Verify #1111

4 tests failed due to quota errors with project resources. I do not see any more quota errors on the project, this should fix itself in the next run. Ahmet On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Apache Jenkins Server < jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > See

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New committers, January 2017 edition!

ooking at code contributions > > > >alone, he authored 43 commits and reported 25 issues. Stas is very > > > >active > > > >on the mailing lists too, contributing to good discussions and > > > >proposing > > > >improvements to the Beam model. > > &

Re: [VOTE] Merge Python SDK to the master branch

is more important. > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Robert Bradshaw <

Re: [DISCUSS] Python SDK status and next steps

fleshed > out soon; including potentially new users/contributors that would arrive > once in master. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/CAAzyFAxcmexUQnbF=Y > k0plmm3f5e5bqwjz4+c5doruclnxo...@mail.gmail.com > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google

Re: [DISCUSS] Python SDK status and next steps

Thank you all for the comments so far. I would follow the process as suggested by Davor and others in this thread. Ahmet On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Ahmet Altay <al...@google.co

<    5   6   7   8   9   10