Thank you all. I will wait for release blocking issues to be closed.

Sergio, thank you for the information. I will document the friction points
during this release process. Following the release we can start a
discussion about how to fix those.

Ahmet

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
wrote:

> That was my mistake, sorry for that. I should have tagged [1] as a blocker
> because leaking state is probably a bad idea. At least then people would be
> aware and we could have discussed whether it is a blocker.
>
> There is already an open PR for this now.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1517
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 18:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
> > Regarding BEAM-649, it's not a release blocker, it's a good to have.
> >
> > As I'm pretty close to the end of the Pull Request (hopefully tonight or
> > tomorrow), it's a "Good To Have".
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 02/28/2017 06:09 PM, Davor Bonaci wrote:
> > > Can we please use JIRA to tag potentially release-blocking issues?
> Anyone
> > > can just add a 'Fix Versions' field of an open issue to the next
> > scheduled
> > > release -- and it becomes easily visible to everyone in the project.
> > >
> > > In general, I'm not a fan of blocking releases for new functionality.
> > > Rushing new features and a lack of baking time usually translates to
> > bugs.
> > > However, I think this time it is totally justified -- on a separate
> > thread
> > > we plan for this to be the last release before the "first stable
> > release";
> > > and picking the new features now will provide additional coverage for
> it.
> > >
> > > So, +1, but please tag in JIRA.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I would like to finish these two:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1036: Support for new
> State
> > API
> > >> in FlinkRunner
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1116: Support for new
> Timer
> > API
> > >> in Flink runner
> > >>
> > >> Both of them are finished for the streaming runner, for the batch
> runner
> > >> I'm merging the code for the first right now and the second will not
> > take
> > >> long.
> > >>
> > >> There is also this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1517:
> > User
> > >> state in the Flink Streaming Runner is not garbage collected. It's
> not a
> > >> regression from 0.5.0 where we simply didn't have this feature but I'm
> > >> still somewhat uneasy about this.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 at 09:44 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Fair enough.
> > >>>
> > >>> I also try to merge https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/1739 asap.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> JB
> > >>>
> > >>> On 02/28/2017 09:34 AM, Amit Sela wrote:
> > >>>> I'd prefer we wait to merge https://github.com/apache/
> beam/pull/2050
> > >>>> Shouldn't take long now..
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:00 AM Sergio Fernández <
> wik...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Sounds good!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Ahmet, notice ASF has not current infrastructure to stage Python
> > >> Release
> > >>>>> Candidates. Anyway we left unmanaged the Maven deploy lifecycle for
> > >> the
> > >>>>> Python SDK, but it should be discussed at some point.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Ahmet Altay
> > >> <al...@google.com.invalid
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> It's been about a month since the last release. I would like
> propose
> > >>>>>> starting the next release. There are no releasing blocking bugs in
> > >> JIRA
> > >>>>>> [1]. Are there any release blocking issues I am missing?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Unless there is an objection I will volunteer to manage this
> > release.
> > >>>>> This
> > >>>>>> will be the first release with Python content. In case there are
> > >> issues
> > >>>>>> with that it might be easier for me to resolve and document those
> as
> > >>> part
> > >>>>>> of the release process.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thank you,
> > >>>>>> Ahmet
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> > >>>>>> 3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%
> > >>>>>> 20fixVersion%20%3D%200.6.0%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%
> > >>>>>> 20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Sergio Fernández
> > >>>>> Partner Technology Manager
> > >>>>> Redlink GmbH
> > >>>>> m: +43 6602747925 <+43%20660%202747925> <+43%20660%202747925>
> > <+43%20660%202747925>
> > >>>>> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > >>>>> w: http://redlink.co
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >>> jbono...@apache.org
> > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>

Reply via email to