On Jan 29, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
More tomorrow; gotta go to bed.
Heh, doesn't look like you need much help from me for programming :-)
Still, I think it bears repeating that looking at your library from
the outside first might help in this design process.
//Ed
On Jan 28, 2006, at 10:08 AM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Jan 28, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
I really don't care whether it's Python or Ruby, since both are
object-oriented, and both are easy to read.
At any rate, ultimately I'd like to see both citeproc-rb (think a
module that
On Jan 29, 2006, at 9:52 PM, pt wrote:
I agree that test-driven development will help a lot here.
One starting point would be tests that show you can load data into
some object from the RDF serialization suggested by Bruce then re-
serialize it back out. Trivial to implement at first, but
On Nov 12, 2005, at 3:21 PM, David Wilson wrote:
My impression is that they support, in principle, our approach
and goals. We have to wait and see what resources can be scheduled
for this
work and when.
Wow, this is great news. I'm a new subscriber to the dev list. I got
interested by
