On 4/21/06, David Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I notice you have converted role (Author, Editor etc) from a table of role
> types , in earlier models, to a field in Contributions in this model. I
> think it there should be a table. Even if it was not linked into the database
> it could us
Bruce,
Do you envisage the the various types tables - locators, contributors
to be
user extendable ?
I notice you have converted role (Author, Editor etc) from a table of role
types , in earlier models, to a field in Contributions in this model. I
think it there should be a table.
On Apr 19, 2006, at 8:04 PM, David Wilson wrote:
For someone who is just installed Rails, could give a brief
description of
how or where we plug in this schema to try it out in Rails ?
It's not far enough along yet. I'm just at the schema + model + unit
testing phase. I think I just about h
Bruce,
For someone who is just installed Rails, could give a brief description
of
how or where we plug in this schema to try it out in Rails ?
David
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 11:03 pm, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Apropropos in part of today's DOI post, I've been slowly working a bit
> more
Apropropos in part of today's DOI post, I've been slowly working a bit
more on a possible data model through a Rails app. Below is the schema
definition in Ruby, with comments. I still need to figure out what to
do about titles/alternate titles, and dates. Let me know what you
think.
The cor
Edward,
Welcome to our project, I am sure you will be be able to find
some
interesting way to use your programming skills to help us. Please keep in
touch.
David
On Sunday 13 November 2005 8:32 am, Edward Summers wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2005, at 3:21 PM, David Wilson wrote:
> >
On Nov 12, 2005, at 3:21 PM, David Wilson wrote:
My impression is that they support, in principle, our approach
and goals. We have to wait and see what resources can be scheduled
for this
work and when.
Wow, this is great news. I'm a new subscriber to the dev list. I got
interested by foll
Bibliographic List members,
To let you know what has been happening -
Bruce D'Arcus has been lobbying senior Sun OpenOffice managers to get some
definite statement of support for our project and some idea of the scope of
work that they may be willing to undertake. We hav
On 9/27/05, Sweet Coffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this mean that users would be able to adjust the GUI so that the
> Biblio feature in OOo would be able to collect necessary information
> [determined by the user] based on Citation Style for a document?
What I was talking about there was
Hello Bruce!
Does this mean that users would be able to adjust the GUI so that the
Biblio feature in OOo would be able to collect necessary information
[determined by the user] based on Citation Style for a document?
SC
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
SNIP.
One open question is about the record
Sorry, but it seems I've been unsubscribed from the list for the past
few days (long story). Anyway, to reply to Martha's questions (which I
got from the archive):
Thanks much for the update! I had been wondering and within a
heartbeat
of dropping the project,
As were David and I!
but t
Matthias Steffens wrote:
The same could be said for CQL, btw. At least what concerns PHP
developers. It would be great if we could find someone who'd be
willing to develop (or finance the development) of a good PHP CQL
parser. This would greatly ease the implementation of standards
like SRU/SRW+
Matthias Steffens wrote:
If you've got any pointers to introductory material about
PRISM/RDF, I'd appreciate them.
Here's a couple articles Tony Hammond (who I've been chattin with)
contributed to:
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december04/hammond/12hammond.html
http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/07/2
Hi Bruce,
On 14-Sep-2005 at 14:50 -0400 Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > However, could there be a solution where both formats go hand in
> > hand together and where OOo would simply accept both formats -- no
> > matter how it stores it's stuff internally?
> If we do decide on something other than MODS,
Matthias Steffens wrote:
I would find it rather, uuhm, frustrating to see you (and the OOo
folks) move away from MODS. Especially since it was *you* who
convinced us to support it within our bibliographic applications.
;-)
:-)
However, could there be a solution where both formats go hand in
Hi Bruce,
thanks for the update regarding OOo.
On 14-Spe-2005 at 13:25 -0400 Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> one issue that we're going to have to return to is the format:
> whether it's MODS, or something else. I've grown a little
> uncomfortable with standardizing on MODS.
I would find it rather, uuh
Hi all,
List has been dead for awhile, so just a quick update.
David is away in the Outback for a long vacation. Before he left, he and
I rattled some cages at Sun out of sheer frustration with the lack of
communication we were getting about plans going forward. I've gotten a
tentative respon
17 matches
Mail list logo
