Re: [dev-biblio] another, more radical, possibility

On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:50 AM, Matthias Basler wrote: Using usual XML parsers as I know them from Java it is not easier or more difficult to parse or write elements than attributes. The issues I'm concerned about (beyond file size, which is substantially smaller now) are not parsing or seriali

Re: [dev-biblio] another, more radical, possibility

Zitat von Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am trying to wrap up the new version of CSL and would like some > feedback. > > Here's another, even flatter, and more generic possibility: > > > > > > [...] Hi Bruce Just some weeks ago I read on

Re: [dev-biblio] another, more radical, possibility

On Feb 5, 2006, at 8:58 PM, pt wrote: Looks ok to me, but have you considered whether an attribute is the best way to represent the prefix and suffix? What if they actaully require some formatting in some environments? I originally had them as elements, but a long time back decided to chang

Re: [dev-biblio] another, more radical, possibility

Looks ok to me, but have you considered whether an attribute is the best way to represent the prefix and suffix? What if they actaully require some formatting in some environments?So would you ever need:  ( )On 2/6/06, Bruce D'Arcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Am trying to wrap up the new version