Re: [VOTE] BP-66: support throttling for zookeeper read of rereplication

+1 (binding) On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 1:46 AM Andrey Yegorov wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -- > Andrey > > On 2024/04/30 03:05:56 thetumbled wrote: > > Hi, everyone.I would like to start voting thread for BP-66: support > throttling for zookeeper read of rereplication.Proposal PR: >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.4, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. - the source package is built and runs successfully. - The binary package runs well. On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified signatures and checksums > - Build from source code (MacOS M3 JDK

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.5, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. - the source package is built and runs successfully. - The binary package runs well. On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:55 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Built on Mac with JDK11 > Run smoke tests on the compiled binaries >

Re: BP62-New API for batched reads

+1 The output looks great! Looking forward to it. On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:39 AM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 > > Looking forward to this feature. > > Thanks, > Hang > > Enrico Olivelli 于2023年8月20日周日 21:24写道： > > > > Hello, > > The proposal is well written, I have no questions. > > We have been

Re: Force to use linux/amd64 to build release

+1 On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:50 PM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 > > The BookKeeper 4.16.2 is released based on ARM platform and the direct > IO can't be enabled in 4.16.2. > > Best, > Hang > > Enrico Olivelli 于2023年8月28日周一 16:46写道： > > > > +1 > > > > Thanks > > We should cut a new release as soon as

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.3, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. - the source package is built and runs successfully. - binary package 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' runs well. On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 9:46 AM Hang Chen wrote: > All unit tests passed when the BookKeeper dependency of the Pulsar >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.8, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. - the source package is built and runs successfully. - binary package 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' runs well. On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 10:12 AM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Verified signatures and checksums > - Build from

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.16.1, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. - the source package is built and runs successfully. - binary package 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' runs well. On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 1:33 AM Andrey Yegorov wrote: > +1 (binding) > > * reviewed release notes > > * built from tag,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Hang Chen on the Apache BookKeeper PMC

Congrats and well deserved On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 3:54 PM tison wrote: > Congrats and well deserved :) > > Best, > tison. > > > guo jiwei 于2023年3月15日周三 15:49写道： > > > Congrats ! > > > > Regards > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy) > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:34 AM Yong Zhang > > wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.4, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. They look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - for package bk-server,bk-all: 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' runs well. On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:15 AM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thank Yong for

Re: [VOTE] BP-61: Revert BP-59 to release ByteBuf using ReferenceCountUtil.release() instead of ReferenceCountUtil.safeRelease()

+1 On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 4:52 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 21 feb 2023 alle ore 05:38 Hang Chen > ha scritto: > > > > Hi, All > > > > After a fascinating discussion, I would start the vote for BP-61. > > > > We will replace the

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.7, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures. They look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' run well. On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 4:52 AM Massimiliano Mirelli < massimilianomirelli...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > *

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.6, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' run well. On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 2:55 PM steven lu wrote: > +1 non binding > > Hang Chen

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.3, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' run well. On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 8:54 AM Hang Chen wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Build

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.2, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test runs well. - in both binary packages, 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:22 PM steven lu wrote: > +1 - non

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.15.1, release candidate #3

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary packages(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:43 AM Hang Chen

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.14.5 released

Con~! On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:38 PM Nicolò Boschi wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.14.5. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage > service optimized for > real-time workloads. It has been used for a

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.5, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary packages(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 1:56 AM Henry

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer ZhangJian He (shoothzj)

Congrats Zhangjian! On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 9:30 AM Yong Zhang wrote: > Congrats! > > On Thu, 5 May 2022 at 09:20, Hang Chen wrote: > > > Congrats Zhangjian! > > > > Thanks, > > Hang > > > > Andrey Yegorov 于2022年5月4日周三 23:52写道： > > > > > > Congrats! > > > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 5:36 AM

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.4, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary packages(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:58 AM Andrey

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.14.2, release candidate #1

+1 - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all) and the target that builds from src package, 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Sun,

Re: Add BookKeeper Go client for repo

+1 On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:51 AM Michael Marshall wrote: > +1 It sounds like a great addition to me, too. > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:40 PM r...@apache.org > wrote: > > > Thanks Enrico. > > > > > As for as I know there is no plan. > > > > > > I believe it would be great. > > > > It looks

Re: [VOTE] BookKeeper release 4.14.1, release candidate #0

+1 - verified packages checksum and signatures, they look good. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all) and the target that builds from src package, 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Sat,

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.13.0, release candidate #0

pache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/ Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:54 AM Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > LICENSE file looks good > NOTICE file looks good > Signature file looks good > Checksum file matched > No

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.12.0 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce the Apache BookKeeper version 4.12.0. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper 4.12.0 release candidate 0

Id on a small cluster > > > > > > I noticed a small issue on "bookkeper standalone" mode, that is not > > > implementing BP-38 correctly and thus you cannot use BookieId, but > > > "bookkeeper standalone" is mostly a dev mode utility, s

Re: Contributing Splunk changes back to OSS

Thanks for this information.Ivan. looking forward to the changes. A BP and docs for the Gradle are very needed. +1 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:26 AM Anup Ghatage wrote: > You can find the proposal doc here: > &

[VOTE] Apache BookKeeper 4.12.0 release candidate 0

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on release candidate #0 for version 4.12.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * Release notes [1] * The official

Re: Cutting Apache BookKeeper 4.12.0

We will start the 4.12 release today. Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 5:18 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mer 4 nov 2020 alle ore 22:17 Sijie Guo ha > scritto: > > > Okay. I will do the release. > &

Re: Moving BooKeeper to JDK11

 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:19 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > FYI > Latest BK image is now running on OpenJDK11 by default > docker run apache/bookkeeper:latest > > The same will be for BK 4.12, but in BK 4

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.11.1 released

Congratulations!! On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:59 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.11.1. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage > service optimized for > real-time workloads. It has

Re: join up

welcome Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:30 AM lobo xu wrote: > join up >

Re: Cutting Apache BookKeeper 4.12.0

+1 Thank you Enrico for the great initiative, especially for the great project management. Also noticed that BookKeeper 4.11 has been released for almost 4 months. There is a lot for other great features besides BP-41. e.g. the ExplictLAC fixes will help a lot on a Pulsar issue, which failed for

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper 4.11.1 release candidate 1

hell bookiesanity' runs well. Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 6:31 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hey guys, > please checkout this release and VOTE > > > Enrico > > Il giorno ven 16 ott 2020 alle ore 16:35 Enrico Olivelli &l

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.11.1, release candidate #0

eper shell bookiesanity' runs well. Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:52 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > thanks to everyone who voted up to now > > we need at least 3 votes from PMC members in order to approve the release

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.11.0, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Environment: macOS 10.15.5 - verified packages checksum ( asc and sha good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. Best Regards. Jia

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Rajan Dhabalia

Congratulations Rajan Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 2:54 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > Congratulations Rajan! Thank you for your contribution! > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:24 PM Rajan Dhabalia > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Migrate the Jenkins CI to Github Actions

+1 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 12:48 AM Alessandro Luccaroni - Diennea < alessandro.luccar...@diennea.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Alessandro > > > -Messaggio originale- > > Da: Yong

Re: [DISCUSS] drop -Dstream - Always build stream storage service

+1 for me Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 6:46 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > ping > > Il giorno sab 28 dic 2019 alle ore 17:15 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > Hi Bookkeepe

Re: [DISCUSS] Dropping Twitter modules

+1 to remove it. Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 6:37 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is the patch > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2232 > > @Sijie @Dave please take a look > > Enrico > > Il giorno

Re: Deprecate legacy API ? Which steps ?

+1 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 6:29 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 for deprecating the legacy API. > > Sijie > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:23 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I think it

Re: Bookkeeper stickers?

+1 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:47 AM Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:00 AM Anup Ghatage wrote: > > > That would be awesome! > > What can we do for those of us who

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.10.0 released

 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 3:14 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.10.0. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-lat

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.10.0, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Environment: macOS 10.14.2 - verified packages checksum and signatures. - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. Jia Zhai Beijing, C

Re: Last issues before cutting 4.10

Thanks Enrico, It is all clean now. Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:43 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Thank you Jia, > so we have only 1 pending issue targeted 4.10 > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/

Re: Last issues before cutting 4.10

Hi, Thanks for taking care of it. I have merged some of 4.10 PRs, And also move some features tasks into 4.11. If there were any mistaken, please help correct them:https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/milestone/7. Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Sun, Oct

Re: Jenkins migration proposal

+1 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:07 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Cc dev@bookkeeper > If it works well for Pulsar we could try for BK, we have a quite complex > precommit job set > > > Enrico > >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.9.2, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Environment: macOS 10.14.2 - verified 4 packages checksum ( asc and sha all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Thu, May 9, 2019

Re: [DRAFT] BookKeeper Board Report of May

+1 Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 1:02 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Enrico > > Il gio 9 mag 2019, 06:30 Matteo Merli ha scritto: > > > +1 > > > > > > -- > > Matte

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.8.2 released

Con~ Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:52 PM Ivan Kelly wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.8.2. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.9.1 released

Con~ Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:01 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.9.1. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-laten

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.9.1, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Environment: macOS 10.14.2 - verified 4 packages checksum ( asc and sha all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. Best Regards.

Re: Tags, version numbers and docker

+1 for ivan's idea Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile: +86 15810491983 On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:55 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 09:26 Ivan Kelly > ha scritto: > > > > To clarify, what I intend to do here is. > > >

[DRAFT] BookKeeper Board report of Feb.

subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months): - 1994 emails sent to list (2433 in previous quarter) - u...@bookkeeper.apache.org: - 118 subscribers (up 3 in the last 3 months): - 14 emails sent to list (17 in previous quarter) - Best Regards. Jia Zhai

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.9.0 released

Con ~ Best Regards. Jia Zhai Beijing, China Mobile & WeChat: 15810491983 On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:37 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Congrats > > Thank you Sijie for putting all together. > > Thanks to Ivan that did the huge reworking around metadata. > > Enrico >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.9.0, release candidate #1

+1 (binding) Environment: macOS 10.14.2 - verified 4 packages checksum ( asc and sha all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in both binary package(server & all), 'bin/bookkeeper standalone' and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well. On Tue, Jan 29,

Re: DCOS/OS Package users

+1, the co-work between communications is some kind of un-predictable. Maybe we could do it once it is really needed. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:58 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi BookKeepers ! > > During the release process we are submitting packages to Mesosphere > Universe for running

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.7.3 released

Con~ On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:54 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.7.3. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage > service optimized for > real-time workloads. It has been used for a

Re: Release 4.7.3

 On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:54 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to cut a 4.7.3 release late this week. If you have any fixes > to include in 4.7.3, please label those issues as 4.7.3, then I will make > sure they are included. > > - Sijie >

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.1, release candidate #1

+1(binding). MacOS 10.14.1 - SHA512 & GPG signatures good - local build, mvn test and integration test runs well - bookkeeper localbookie and bookiesanity runs well for all and server bin. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:26 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > checked binaries, run tests from

Re: BookKeeper Board report draft - due to today

+1, Thanks for the help Enrico, Seems only PMC Chair could do it. On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:42 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Sijie, > can I submit the report or only the PMC chair can ? > The tool requires an authentication but I cannot login with my Apache > credentials > > Enrico > Il giorno

Re: Time for a 4.8.1 release?

+1 for 4.8.1 release On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 5:45 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi Bookkeepers ! > > We cherry picked a few critical fixes to 4.8 branch. I would like to have a > 4.8.1 release > > See the commits here: > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commits/branch-4.8 > > Thoughts? > > I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.8.0 released

Congrats! Thanks Enrico. On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 2:09 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > Congrats! Well done, Enrico. > > - Sijie > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:27 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version >> 4.8.0. >> >> Apache BookKeeper is

Re: Release schedule for 4.9.0

 On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 2:11 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:19 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi, > > As 4.8.0 has been released (mail to annou...@apache.org) will be sent > > soon we have to think about a schedule for 4.9.0. > > > > I will update the website once we

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.0, release candidate #1

+1(binding). - SHA512 & GPG signatures good - Rat and spotbugs good - local build, mvn test and integration test runs well - bookkeeper standalone and bookiesanity runs well for all and server bin. On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 3:56 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > Thanks for putting this together Enrico. I

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.0, release candidate #0

Thanks for the work, will wait and validate the new rc. On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 6:54 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno mar 18 set 2018 alle ore 11:41 Ivan Kelly ha > scritto: > > > Hey Enrico, > > > > Thanks for putting this together. Afraid it's -1 from me though. > > > > The new binaries

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.7.1 released

Cong~ . Thanks for the work @Sijie. On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:24 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Great! Thank you Sijie > > Enrico > > > Il mer 20 giu 2018, 17:31 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > >> The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version >> 4.7.1. >> >> Apache BookKeeper

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.1, release candidate #0

+1 (binding) Environment: macOS 10.13.5 - verified 3 packages checksum ( asc and sha1 all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - build and run docker on server binary package, `make run-dice` command works well. - in both binary package(server & all),

Re: Docs for 4.7 features?

 On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 > > contributors, please help improve the bookkeeper docs :) > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:29 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > I think we should spend some time to improve docs, especially for > upcoming > > features. > > >

Re: Project Website is MIA

@David Fisher, Thanks for the reporting. Are you able to access the website now? On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > Thanks for ASF Infra team, especially Chris Lambertus's help on it. > The website is working fine now. > The failure is caused by gitwcsub sync issue. &

Re: Project Website is MIA

ed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > > > Asked Asf Infra for helping it now. > > - http and https both have the issue. > > - directly access from China is fine, while from US some area not work. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:52 PM,

Re: Project Website is MIA

Asked Asf Infra for helping it now. - http and https both have the issue. - directly access from China is fine, while from US some area not work. On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > To me it happens using http:// instead of https:// > > Enrico > > Il gio 7 giu 2018,

Re: improve bookkeeper build time

 On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 5:05 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Put up a fix to remove postcommit phrase triggers - > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1482 > > - Sijie > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > > I think enabling phrase trigger on precommits job will result in > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.7.0 released

con~ On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Sijie Guo wrote: > The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version > 4.7.0. > > Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency > storage service > optimized for real-time workloads. It has been

Re: Official Docker Images

+1 On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mar 17 apr 2018, 20:57 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > Hi all, > > > > Current docker images are auto-built by apache docker account. It > becomes a > > bit problematic in the release process.

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

> > 2018-04-17 8:45 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: > > > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > > > There are 4 approving votes, 4 of which are binding: > > > > * Enrico Olivelli > > * Jia Zhai > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

checked, sha1 is good now.  On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Done. Thanks Jia! > > - Sijie > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

Hi Sijie, would you please update the the sha1 files? It seems they point to your local path: ``` cat bookkeeper-4.7.0-src.tar.gz.sha1 75db0fcb75cc35424fc171411b0f161dd905076c /Users/sijie/Workspaces/ bookkeeper/target/dist_dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.7.0- rc1/bookkeeper-4.7.0-src.tar.gz ```

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #2

+1, - verified both packages checksum ( asc and sha1 all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in binary package, bin/bookkeeper and command localbookie runs well. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -

Re: Old DistributedLog 0.5.0 RC1 on dist.apache.org

+1 On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > 2018-04-03 13:48 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly : > >> Kill it. If 0.5.0 is out, then it serves no purpose. >> > > > Dropped > > Enrico > > >> >> -Ivan >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:36 PM, Enrico

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #0

Hi Enrico, Thanks for the work. Seems this asc file has some error: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.6.2-rc0/bookkeeper-server-4.6.2-bin.tar.gz.asc Thanks. -Jia On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding)

Re: Drop md5 from release procedure

 On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > I will upgrade the procedure while preparing 4.6.2 release > > Enrico > > Il lun 19 mar 2018, 18:26 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > Thank you. I found the email now. > > > > If this is a request

Re: Release 4.7.0

 On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:19 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il lun 12 mar 2018, 07:50 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > Updates on release 4.7: > > > > Since Pulsar is switching from using yahoo release to apache release, I > am > > delaying release 4.7.0 for

Re: Triage process for current open issues

 On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > 2018-03-07 13:15 GMT+01:00 Ivan Kelly : > > > Hi folks, > > > > We currently have about 150 open issues. Sometimes it feels like stuff > > is added an never looked at again. We need to do some > >

Re: BP-27: New BookKeeper CLI

+1, It is great to break down this huge file, and make it more structure-able. The prototype PR seems more clear, and jcommander is nice. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > I created a new proposal for refactoring `BookieShell` into a new >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.6.1 released

 On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:14 AM, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > Awesome work Enrico! Thanks a lot!! > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > >> Thanks for all your work in getting this out Enrico! >> >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:38 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.6.1, release candidate #0

+1, - verified packages checksum (md5, asc and sha1 all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - NOTICE, License headers in binary package look good. - in binary package, bin/bookkeeper and command localbookie runs well. On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Enrico

Re: Cutting 4.6.1 release

+1, >From my view, it is better to "have an issue for each PR". On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Some news, I am on hold due to two critical bugs to be fixed. > I will resume as soon as we merge the fixes > Stay tuned > Enrico > > Il dom 14 gen

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.6.0 released

Thanks a lot for all of your help. On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jia, congrats for you first release! > > Thanks everyone for making contributions to 4.6.0 release. > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Jia Zhai

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BookKeeper 4.6.0 released

The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version 4.6.0. Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-latency storage service optimized for real-time workloads. It has been used for a fundamental service to build reliable services. It is also the log segment

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New BookKeeper Committer: Yiming Zang

Congrats Yiming. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Yiming Zang wrote: > Thank you! I'm very happy to join the community! > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Congrats Yiming! > > Enrico > > > > Il lun 18 dic 2017,

Re: [Vote] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2, without -all package

-4.6.0" [4] with sha > > 0d6c21e0a88749c428749841db > > >> > 59cf53195e556c > > >> > > > >> > BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this > > >> > release:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KE

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

I’m happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 4 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: * Enrico Olivelli(no-binding) * Sijie Guo(binding) * Ivan Kelly(binding) * David Rusek(binding) There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone!

[Vote] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2, without -all package

any other things you think it is important to a release. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Jia Zhai [1] *https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759 <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

Please ignore this email. it has been cancelled, and a new voting email has been sent. Thanks. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the help. > Since bookkeeper-all package contains jars whose license are unclear, > would like to c

[VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

any other things you think it is important to a release. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Jia Zhai [1] *https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759 <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

Thanks for the help. Since bookkeeper-all package contains jars whose license are unclear, would like to cancel this vote thread and will remove bookkeeper-all in the new vote thread. The new thread will keep the same rc number. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Sijie Guo

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

> This jar is New BSD licensed, but also has some files under Creative > commons Attribution License, though they don't mention this in their > own LICENSE, which is strange and annoying. > > Do we even need this jar? > > -Ivan > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Enr

[VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #2

ll be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes. Thanks, Jia Zhai [1] *https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759 <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759>* [2] *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4

Draft Agenda for Bi-weekly meeting at 2017-12-14

Hi all, :) I would like to put a draft Agenda here for 12/14's meeting, this is just limited from my point of view, Please feel free to add anything you want to discuss in this meeting. *Agenda:* 1. Help voting

  1   2   3   4   >